Think Logically!
By far our best option right now is to stay calm, spread the word, and trust the plan. Why?
There are three worlds we could be living in, but we can’t yet know which one is real:
- Trump is in control and he has a plan to win, and destroy the swamp
- Trump is already dead or incapacitated; his plan has failed
- Trump is betraying us
If (1) is the truth, then our best course of action is to hold the line, spread the word, keep up the energy, and await further instructions. If and when we have a role to play he will tell us. If he needs to get the signal out he will, no matter what Twatter and Fuckerberg say. So we just need to wait.
Jan 6 was all about proving three points in one go: Proving to himself, to the swamp and to ourselves that we have his back and will crawl over broken glass to support him. If he wants a million strapped patriots to take over every state capital at once, he only needs to ask, we will show up. We don’t need to explicitly or publicly plan for that. Just keep the powder dry.
I don’t even think there’s a difference between options (2) and (3). The swamp will never cut a deal, they will just kill him and his entire family, and he knows this. He has proven that he is too dangerous to them, so he has no option but to fully commit.
So, basically, he’s either alive with a plan, or dead.
If he’s live with a plan, playing into the hands of false flag ANTIFA assholes is not the right move. In that case, the military would be deployed against us. That’s what the DS wants more than anything! If he needs our help we will know.
If he’s dead, then we’re in for the long path, we won’t have control of the military working for us, and this is really going to suck donkey balls. But 10 days more or less won’t make much of a difference in that timeline. Come Jan 20, if Biden is inaugurated, we can start down that tragic road.
"Dr. Shiva" put up a video describing analysis he did that purported to show evidence of scorecard. I wanted to check it so I started a github to host raw data and also analysis code. I was able to reproduce his results, but in some threads on the topic there were also some great points made about how this might be an artifact of the analysis. So, I'm starting a new post to encourage collaboration on this, from data collection to coding and vetting the results.
The github is here:
I would like to try to reproduce some of the results reported by Shiva and possibly find other statistical anomalies from precinct level results. Does anyone know where these can be obtained? Preferably from MI since that would allow reproducing existing Shiva results, but any important state would he helpful!
IDEA:
If any recounting is done, both parties should bring their own tabulator machine to scan and tabulate the votes. If they agree, all is well! If not, manual recount. No point running ballots through the same compromised scanner.
If I were designing a vote tabulator to give wrong answers, I would locate reliably detectable distinguishing marks on individual ballots, detect them repeatably, hash the result and REPEATABLY switch X percent of the votes. Exact same wrong answer every time, with no detectable statistical anomalies.
Now that corporate media and big tech social media is completely compromised, how can our people stay informed of the truth and be gaslit into losing hope?
By coming here of course!
Yesterday I went for a walk in the woods and encountered two gentlemen having a heated discussion, who got very quiet as I approached. But I overheard enough to know the score. I asked them if they were "on .win", and when I got blank looks back, I said "oh you really need to be" and gave them the URL. They went on and I hope they stay and tell all their friends.
We must keep our comms open or we are lost!
I live in a place with very little outward trump support but I'm canvassing for addresses of people who are likely and plan to use physical mail to suggest they visit the site.
I am working on a letter to write, will repost when I have a sample letter, for copypasta.
The federal govt has a department that certifies election equipment. There may be state laws that require equipment to be certified to be used. If a system can be found to have design level flaws that make it unreliable, could the certification be retroactively revoked?
https://www.eac.gov/voting-equipment/system-certification-process
