It is time for us to "shine a light" on what this really is. It is a piece of the Democrat war plan to prevent Republicans from winning a landslide victory in 2022 and prevent Trump from ever getting re-elected. The left have been "allowing" MAGA candidates to win primaries in hope the can pin felony charges on Trump and make him unelectable along any MAGA candidates who supported him. IT WON'T WORK. Trump won and he will win again.
I noticed all of your comments were BS about his past life. As President of the United States, Donald Trump led us to energy independence, low unemployment, a booming economy and more. His actions as President have awakened conservative minorities to move to the Republican Party. He has accomplished a lot for America. The FBI raid is a disgrace and likely illegal. To this point there is no proof that Donald Trump conducted himself in an illegal manner. President Trump l has proven himself to be a "good guy" and good for this country. I look forward to his next four years in office.
No. Most of what you said here is wrong. Covid, in its original form, is not “just the common cold.” Reaching herd immunity (as per the Great Barrington Declaration) quickly would have ended the pandemic quickly and saved countless lives.
Keep in mind the climate emergency is based on phony science. Burning fossil fuels to produce carbon dioxide and water vapor is not warming the earth in any appreciable way and the added carbon dioxide In the atmosphere is good for green plants and therefore good for mankind.
Good point. When I see an occasional person wearing a mask I just ignore them. But I think we need to be more active by telling these people that masks do not stop the spread of the Covid-19 virus. Virus particles are so small that they pass through even the best N-95 mask. We need to stop this mask-wearing nonsense before it starts up again.
I think you underestimate the EPA. It has the ability to totally destroy our economy through implementation of draconian environmental policies. The reality is that the EPA should not have the power to regulate atmospheric CO2.
It is simple, when a law is passed by Congress it outlines a general principle to be implemented and leaves the details to the agency. These agency, such as the EPA, then write Administrative Rules detailing how the law is to be carried out. These rules frequently go beyond the legislative intent. This is how unelected bureaucrats implement their agendas. In the case of CO2, Congress never voted on a bill authorizing the EPA to regulate it. The EPA merely assumed the authority to do so through administrative fiat.
Right. Typically any time Congress passes a law it is referred to the specific agency to write Administrative Rules to implement the law. These rules need to be returned to Congress for final approval before implementation. I recommend we pass a constitutional amendment to assure that all administrative rules be reviewed by Congress before implementation.
Let's examine the above statement "to regulate greenhouse-gas emissions that cause climate change." Of course this is referring specifically to carbon dioxide. There is no scientific proof that carbon dioxide emissions CAUSE climate change. On the other hand, there is significant data that shows increasing the carbon dioxide levels in the environment is good for green plants and thus good for the environment.
Right. But here is where we come in. Right now the house has a slim majority and many of those seeking reelection will be hard pressed to support the phony "GREEN new deal". Bring on the debate in Congress. The green new deal is based on phony science and will fall on its face if debated in Congress.
First we need to stop future illegal immigration by sealing the border. Second, many hispanics are moving towards the Republican Party because their Christian values are more in line with Republican values than the Democratic Communist party. If we cannot send them back we need to assimilate them into the Republican Party.
Your final statement, "because of course climate change happens" is essentially a meaningless statement and plays into the hands of the left wing climate alarmists. All scientists understand that the climate has changed throughout Earth's history. So what! However, there is no scientific proof that burning fossil fuels to produce carbon dioxide and water has resulted in a warming of the earth in any significant way. (Climate alarmists want to blame any negative changes to the climate on additional carbon dioxide resulting from burning of fossil fuels.) We do know that increasing the amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere has a positive effect on green plants and thus is good for mankind.
We are not "forming our opinions", we are putting forth scientific facts. On the issue of Global Warming (ie. Climate change) the science is on our side. The dire warnings of the Climate change crowd is based on Phony science. There is no scientific proof that burning fossil fuels is warming the earth. On. the other hand, there is scientific proof that more carbon dioxide in the atmosphere is good for green plants and thus good for mankind.
SCOTUS should start with the basics about "Climate Change". Climate Change and the Green New Deal is based on phony science. Burning fossil fuels to produce carbon dioxide and water does not cause global warming as Climate alarmists claim. On the other hand, there is real scientific proof that more carbon dioxide in the atmosphere is good for green plants and thus good for mankind. From this starting point, the EPA's house of cards collapses.
Well put. I concur.