Mr Halderman makes some good recommendations to improve election security in the future. His first is Risk Limited Audits in which you check a sample of the paper ballots to see if they statistically agree with the generated results. If not it triggers a more extensive audit. The problem that he ignores through his "audit" report is that although the audit ended up recounting all votes, it never looked at the original paper ballots to determine if any or some of them were illegal votes. We know one of the tactics of the left is to have dead people, underaged voters, out of state voters, unregistered voters, etc vote. This is a major problem. Basedon all the complaints of election fraud, only a total audit of paper ballots will find the answer. Trump Won by a lot.

Further down you will see a link to the second audit. This is the case of the dueling audits. It still does not get down to the level of checking every paper ballot to see if it is a legal vote ( not a dead voter, out of state voter, duplicate voter, fictions voter, etc) but it does address the the large vote switch from Trump to Biden. I had previously read the original forensic audit which claimed the 68% adjudication rate. That report left a few unanswered questions in my mind, like where did the votes go to be adjudicated and who adjudicated them. (The numbers on this thread seem to show a pattern of switching votes. Adjudication would be needed to make the votes line up with the alleged computer switch) The second (or subsequent) audit addresses the numbers originally reported and then the multiple corrections which ultimately resulted in the certified numbers. This audit is obviously aimed at defending the election officials. However, when you get down to the numbers, it does show a simple clerical/operational error that resulted in pushing the numbers for a third party candidate over to Trump and pushing Trumps numbers over to Biden. This of course resulted in a more than 6,000 vote shift. The fact that the error was not caught immediately could have been intended by a poll worker, but was likely just a stupid mistake. The "software update" was not a change to the program as the words suggest, but a last minute change to the ballot that had to be updated in each machine. Only a few machines were updated so the count did not line up with the person voted for on the revised ballots. I think this whole thread is a rabbit hole we should not go down. Beware of people who are pushing you to in that direction. They may be trying you to look like conspiracy nuts. There are many other cases of election fraud that are real and should be pursued. I recommend you do not spend a lot of time on this one.

This is the case of the dueling audits. It still does not get down to the level of checking every paper ballot to see if it is a legal vote ( not a dead voter, out of state voter, duplicate voter, fictions voter, etc) but it does address the the large vote switch from Trump to Biden. I had previously read the original forensic audit which claimed the 68% adjudication rate. That report left a few unanswered questions in my mind, like where did the votes go to be adjudicated and who adjudicated them. (The numbers on this thread seem to show a pattern of switching votes. Adjudication would be needed to make the votes line up with the alleged computer switch) The second (or subsequent) audit addresses the numbers originally reported and then the multiple corrections which ultimately resulted in the certified numbers. This audit is obviously aimed at defending the election officials. However, when you get down to the numbers, it does show a simple clerical/operational error that resulted in pushing the numbers for a third party candidate over to Trump and pushing Trumps numbers over to Biden. This of course resulted in a more than 6,000 vote shift. The fact that the error was not caught immediately could have been intended by a poll worker, but was likely just a stupid mistake. I think this thread is a rabbit whole we should not go down. Beware of people who are pushing you to go down it. They may be trying you to look like conspiracy nuts. There are many other cases of election fraud that are real and should be pursued.

This point of this thread is that the results that were going to be certified before they were challenged were wildly in error in favor of Biden ( and they were consistently in favor of Biden from precinct to precinct). The fact that they were caught and the hand could count was done points to suspected voter fraud which the Secretary of State was attempting to whitewash.

This article is biased and full of holes.

The unanswered question is where did these ballots go (electronically) for adjudication and who adjudicated them. This question should be posed to the those who were administratively responsible for this process and those people should go to jail. I suspect that these were batch adjudicated of site, likely overseas. This is the fraud. Trump Won.

This is where we need to be prepared to call in reinforcements and stop the fraud while it is happening.

I say we need to stop the ballot harvesting. The chain of custody is broken once a political operative from either party has the ballots in their sole possession.. Do not let it happen.

I concur.

Whitmer

A vote that cannot be tied to a registered voter?

I agree with you on the organizing and supervising. I felt the Antifa types were monitoring sites like this one prior Jan6 and planned counter measures (like infiltrating our ranks with phony MAGA people who were egging on the crowd). Some of the organizing needs to be kept secret until he appropriate time.

Part of uncovering the voter fraud is finding out who made and received those calls to shut down the counting in 5 different states at once. Anyone have any leads on this?

Sounds a little like the Democratic vote count.

The key phrase in the second quote is”MIGHT give the virus the ability to evade....”. This means there is no scientific proof at this time. They are just trying to scare you. Do not be taken in by this pseudo science.

Get tested for Covid antibodies. If positive for IgG antibodies, you have had it.

Get tested for Covid antibodies.

Get the antibody rest to see if you have joined the herd.

Based on your statement you likely had Covid. I recommend you get the antibody test. If positive you had Covid and you are immune.

Right. Someone had to to adjudicate each one of these. It is likely the scans of these ballots were sent elsewhere for adjudication. Could have been overseas. I am willing to bet that there was not a Republican and Democrat poll worker reviewing each one of these. The opportunity for fraud here is immense.

We should do a forensic audit on every state controlled by Republicans and check down ballot races as well as the presidential race to check for voter fraud within the Dominion system.

I agree. Lot’s of liberal trolling this site.

I saw the Carlson interview. He acted like an ass. He then followed up with an anti-Noem interview the heat day to get back at her for making him look like a fool.

Amen. I hope you are listening Sen Hannity.

All evidence shows that Ashley Babbit really died. According to the evidence she was shot by capital policeman Dave Bailey who posted on social media that he supported BLM and was looking forward to taking out Trump Supporters, Anyone claiming she did not die is part of the problem. What was fishy about the murder scene is that there were many Democratic operatives and Antifa types who were ther posing as Trump supporter and promoting mayhem. Many of those photographing the incident were Antifa operatives.