Keep it positive. Sometimes big stories aren’t big... until they are.
This has been floating around for weeks.
I never saw the vid until a few days ago.
Never saw more than a few upvotes until this post.
Noticed R Citizen “Hillbilly” boosting on twitty-talk within the past 4hrs. Never give up. This might just cross over. Biden’s doubt level goes up every day. Every edge matters.
Positive vibes, please. No story is big until it is. Upvoting this. Compelling if true. $5 chicken bucket if a mistake this large made it into the “certified” results. I could see even a moderate tossing those electors if more leads like this pan out.
Pressure those legislatures.
No expert here, but I would recommend something off-topic to “crosstrain” the mind. Maybe check out “Pushed to the Edge” by mentalist Darren Brown.
These are some of my favorites. Good job SBW. The “bag of chips” spot is really weird.
Looks like this is about timing. Gives Congress one more shot to have the ball in their court and remove the pork, That seems doubtful.
Not the strongest executive move, but practically speaking it gets relief checks out and wastes no more time futilely railing against a veto-proof majority.
Not necessarily. Some stories peak after initial release... depends on critical mass. I heard hints of this but never encountered a video link before today.
Biden might have a legitimate response to the criminal aspects, but I don’t see how it doesn’t end up being dirty and unethical at a minimum. Looks bad. And I understand he’s a wanted felon? Hahaha...Updooted.
Does this mean the walls are closing in?
Her hospital posted a short video here purporting to show her doing ok on 12/21/20 per US Daily Report:
My opinion is: Probably not dead. Probably didn’t intend to be the famous “fainting nurse” and is keeping a low profile. The “proof-of-life” video looks awkward but not conspiratorial.
Cover-up? Anything’s possible, but to my eyes this looks like someone who just wants to be left alone. Maybe she doesn’t constantly engage on social media. Many people don’t.
Well...? Did you sign up for the Cornyn monthly newsletter or not?
That too. For sure.
But not logically necessary based on a survey of successful fraud cases. Judges appear to act only when each individual vote can be shown spoiled (single digit margins). The larger cases won’t be touched for years.
Mail-in ballots have caused such a mess that legislators alone are in a position to throw out areas with a failed election process, IMO.
I didn’t see this yet. Read it. It is interesting that the parties were tentatively identified and everything transcribed in a real court filing.
Looks like a double-edged sword though. ‘Koch’ makes some statements that, even if true (‘Trump won California,’ eg), are difficult for the average person to accept. This undercuts the value of the transcript.
Since it was already in a court case, there is a possibility it undergirds the fraud claims. But only if we see better evidence. Still just hearsay at this point imo.
This one is a long shot, but not impossible. The story itself is old (Steel Reports, 12/1/20, linked in Stew Peters thread). The story is supposedly being further developed as a flight attendant delivers testimony.
There are some photos/short video of a South Korean plane combined with hearsay that said plane contained forged ballots per Hartwig. The presence of ballots has not been demonstrated as far as I can see.
There is an audio recording available per Steel, purporting to contain an admission of guilt by a named source (Mr. Koch). But the audio quality is so horrendous that it fails to compel. If other pieces fall into place... maybe. Right now this looks flimsy.
They need to provide photo, video, bill of lading, or some other concrete evidence of physical ballots being on a plane independent of verbal statements.
In the meantime, if the story is really going up the chain to the Giuliani team (as per Peters thread), they need an audio mastering engineer to help out STAT. That recording is going to convince nobody in the general public as it stands. I really can’t tell what they are saying.
Someone asked above about the “retractions” involving software vendors. I did not see anything with OAN but did see the “retractions” on Fox and Newsmax.
IMO the “retractions” I’ve seen were merely narrow statements of fact that dodge the security issues. E.g., it is probably strictly true that Smartmatic and Dominion do not use “the same” programs. This in no way obviates concerns that adjudication features shared by similar software systems may have inherent flaws, and may be used maliciously with limited ability to audit after the fact.
Likewise, I would judge Powell/Wood claims of Venezuelan influence as good marketing strategy, but equally beside the point. “Adjudication” is difficult to pronounce, not very sexy, and not visually stimulating. References to a corrupt foreign country are. Did an evil cabal hatch a secret voting fraud plan whilst smoking cigars in some off-grid hut?
Probably not. But the security issues appear valid nonetheless. Until I see election officials and news outlets deal with the adjudication issue, my money is on the fraud... there’s too much motive and too much opportunity to wave away.
So IMO, these “retractions” are misleading, irrelevant, and represent exactly the type of dishonest pushback one would expect from a guilty party. Happy to be shown if this is not the case.
1st time post. Lurker. Non-Trump voter. Common-sense American here who has followed a trail of bread crumbs ever since Election Day and successively tuned out news sources that lie about provable facts. I ended up here.
It’s funny. Prior to election, I kept up with the “standard” MSM sides, and the biases became a sort of comfortable change of clothes. Predictable. Fox/Breitbart tended to be much more accurate over the past several years, but occasionally NYT/Wapo would provide a useful reality check (in my opinion).
After the election, something very strange happened. The Uniparty became absolutely clear to me for the first time. In most previous circumstances, if I apprehended an obvious lie, I would simply accept that as part of the game, then consult another news source to flesh out the context. We all have bias.. blah blah but read widely and you’ll be OK, right?
Apparently, not any more. If, after an election, there is an unmistakable, jet-engine-loud, vociferous, and robust election challenge underway, there simply is no such thing as an undisputed “President-Elect.”
I am no genius. But I know this: if an election challenge occurs, it must be followed to conclusion, whether the challenger’s views align with my own or not. The minute there is a concession, then: yes, we now have a “President-Elect.” But not a minute sooner. I thought (naively) this was a common understanding.
So WHY has EVERY SINGLE major news outlet converged on the same obvious, provable, factually indisputable LIE that a President-Elect exists at all? We don’t have one yet.
Sorry to ramble on, but that’s what got me here. I’m not stupid enough to believe the media “serves” me, but never have I seen every outlet simultaneously take such a dive. When I am fed such an obvious lie from all angles, it is so repulsive to me that I am required to switch up.
And now for why I am posting right here, right now. Although I’m not a Trump voter, I’m generally a supporter of a good direction for our country. Trump’s done a fine job as far as I can tell. But it’s so clear this guy got robbed on Election night.
The “centrist” part of me can step back and say.... yes, there’s election fraud always. This time I could even make a case for extra motive and extra opportunity... gets you a little further. And I myself believe this was a stolen election. But how to convince “fence-sitters”?
I’ll be honest, I agree with the direction of many of the stat people but take issue with details (e.g., how do you know the Edison data is supposed to be regular? It’s taken as axiomatic, and therefore not compelling, even though I believe the conclusion).
But this Matt Braynard post is the end.
If this keeps going, that’s it. This is how Trump wins.
I don’t know if I’m adding any value to this site at all, but just know that if I could give this a thousand thumbs up I would. This is undeniable truth. This is what is needed to convince right”-ish” moderate... all the people you may even hate, to get on board as far as restoring real elections. It’s sickening to look at this.
This isn’t someone’s opinion. It’s data from an actual list of counted, tabulated votes. And for Americans from all sides of the aisle it simply says, “TRUMP WON THE REAL VOTE.”
Post more of these, and my confidence goes waaay up that it’s over for Biden.
Keep an eye on this one. Haven’t found a solid debunk yet...