2
BirthHole 2 points ago +2 / -0

The real punchline is you cant change your sex.

3
BirthHole 3 points ago +3 / -0

Murdered by the left & media who constantly shove sexual identity in everyone's faces, and elevating trannies to hero status.

2
BirthHole 2 points ago +2 / -0

If there is a SOTU, my money is on Pelosi delivering the address 'on behalf of the President'.

She's already trying to get custody of the nuclear football.

2
BirthHole 2 points ago +2 / -0

Mental emptiness. The dude is gone. There is no cognitive ability.

1
BirthHole 1 point ago +1 / -0

The Capitol is going to expierence a massive leadership vacuum when Nancy kicks the bucket.

1
BirthHole 1 point ago +1 / -0

Louisville has had a penchant for cowering to any hint of racism. If someone could muster a crowd > 10 black people, and had the ability to phone a local TV station, they could usually get what they demanded.

Getting Ron Cooper as the head coach of U of L football is a much-forgotten example.

1
BirthHole 1 point ago +1 / -0

Basic bully tactics. "Were in charge, and if you dont submit we'll destroy you any way we can".

6
BirthHole 6 points ago +6 / -0

And this is exactly what would have happened at the Capitol had Pence voted the way Trump wanted him to vote.

They were poised to take over the Capitol in a 'revolt of the people against Trump tyranny'. CNN was there to record as citizen arrests of republican senators would be made..

But the other plan was put into effect. Pence voted to accept the delegates. So, the false-flag backup plan initiated.

1
BirthHole 1 point ago +1 / -0

With rigged vote tabulating machines, guess who doesnt need BLM anymore.

1
BirthHole 1 point ago +1 / -0

to effect change, we have to have a majority of votes to elect people who will represent MAGA principles. The machines that tabulate the vote are under the control of people who want to prevent MAGA principles.

You can do the 'hard trek' all you want, but my point is it will be in vain. 'They' control the means of change -- within the current system of government.

Back before 1776, the King owned the colonies. It was his property. 'we' could make recommendations, but the colonists had no means to change anything. If the King wanted it his way, he got it -- He OWNED the land.

The Swamp may not outright own America, but they effectively do since they now control the means of continuation of authority. The point being, we have no voice any longer.

On the point of conflict: If a state seceded,I would argue there is no chance of a shooting war. DC would of course try to shutdown the rouge state through economic/media channels, but there is no way an armed conflict is going to result. We live in the victim age, and the rouge state would receive vast amounts of sympathy with DC looking like a bully. Would isolated cross border shootings happen? Well, of course. And having that new border is going to be a great burden to DC.. People of the breakaway state would be glad to 'volunteer' to guard the border while DC would have to spend billions to hire/feed/supervise/cloth/equip/rotate/transport border guard personnel.

If a state gained sovereignty, it would be in position for massive financial growth. All the taxes the feds suck out of the state would stop overnight. Thats a massive amount of cash. Long story short, the state would prosper exponentially under MAGA principles and other states would want to join in. Industrious people would want to migrate to the 'new america' and the deadbeats would desire to stay on the DC side for gibs.

As the 'New America' gains more states, old DC chokes under the strain of heavy taxation and declining growth. A cycle develops with more and more states opting to join the New America.

No state is allowed in the new America without a MAGA principled constitution and so forth. It simply is 1776 all over again.

1
BirthHole 1 point ago +1 / -0

Choosing the bright blodes-have-more-fun hair color is like a 3D highlighter around his clown makeup.

1
BirthHole 1 point ago +1 / -0

Heres a super quick rundown: Not Necessarily the British per se, but specifically the King and his business buddies. Because the Monarch OWNS the territories outside Britain.

Like Canada for example - Queen Elizabeth OWNS Canada. Its her property.

2
BirthHole 2 points ago +2 / -0

Exactly. But, so many knuckleheads on our side are in complete, or partial, denial of the election fraud -- and what it means.

1
BirthHole 1 point ago +1 / -0

They arent going to believe that Biden & the left are bullshitting them, they will believe the trope that evil-republican-something-or-other stood in the way and they had to stand down on the min. wage, but they continue to keep up the fight.

They'll continue to vote Democrat, and the Democrats know it. It's only when they grow a pair and stop voting that they gain any true power. It wont happen.

3
BirthHole 3 points ago +3 / -0

Way fucking toooooo late.

The tabulating machines were rigged: They got elected, and they are never getting un-elected now.

The time to worry about rigged elections has long gone and the RNC stood by and did jack shit.

7
BirthHole 7 points ago +7 / -0

America didnt start the slave trade here. The British, specifically the King and his aristocrat business buddies, brought the slaves here back when the King owned the colonies.

You see the King and his friends were ass ho. So much so, that the people who lived here said 'fuck your shit' and took over. One of the side-effects was that we inherited the slave issue.

2
BirthHole 2 points ago +2 / -0

And when Jim gets back, he'll get slapped on the back and showered with accolades for his handling of the 'retards in flyover country'. His status among his peers only goes up.

To thier benefit, they got lots of B roll footage to use to showcase 'the average republican'.

A win-win for them.

1
BirthHole 1 point ago +1 / -0

Imagine trying this hard at something you can never accomplish.

2
BirthHole 2 points ago +2 / -0

Choice = power, and governments prefer the power themselves. So, it's the nature of government to always move to consolidate power/choice for themselves.

The issue for us is that once power/choice is ceded to the government its binding on future generations. For example, we are paying for the mistakes of our past citizens voting to allow federal income tax.

What happens is that, over generations, a great schism occurs between the people and government. 'Government' becomes it's own constituency leeching as much power/money from the people as possible, and the people become choked with financial burden and limited ability to effect change.

Revolution is the inevitable result.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›