2
BoJo 2 points ago +2 / -0

Important to point out here - I only found this doc because of Orange Man Rad's tweet here - https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1333979211745341441

Definitely wouldn't be like him at all to shine a laser pointer at something for people to jump on thinking it makes him look bad but ends up making the Dems look bad now would it.

5
BoJo 5 points ago +5 / -0

I'll take "disinformation designed to make us look like idiots" for 100...

Watch Alex Jones on Rogan recently, he talked about the way they "poisoned the well" on pizzagate by adding batshit conspiracies and announcing pizzagate was all about that, ignoring the actual real complaints.

1
BoJo 1 point ago +1 / -0

u/Quant u/MiChecker u/fugg u/trumpdevops

I've been looking at the stuff you've been doing and trying to find a way to compare Pres/Senate/House reported votes at the State/County level for all races over time to see if the same anomalies happen across all races or if there's evidence of "single vote" ballots, ie only votes for Biden.

I think I've hit the jackpot on getting access to data with this granularity but can I confirm with one of you guys first? Don't want it to be taken down immediately. If one of you messages me I'll send a dm.

19
BoJo 19 points ago +21 / -2

https://electproject.github.io/Early-Vote-2020G/PA.html

You're being distracted. The important point isn't how many were or weren't requested. It's the fact that in the two largest counties in Pennsylvania the rejection rate this year was 0.1 and 0.0%

9
BoJo 9 points ago +14 / -5

Because the Dems have a track record of creating disinformation to distract our side and make us look stupid.

22
BoJo 22 points ago +28 / -6

Possibly, but I think it's more likely the Dems put in a fake report to Trump's legal team to distract them and make them look stupid. It's a huge part of their playbook.

26
BoJo 26 points ago +29 / -3

No.

This is the only story out there that matters.

https://twitter.com/Barnes_Law/status/1331686135337127937

What seems to be happening is the Dems have been sneaky little fuckers and are filling the internet with distractions, and submitting a shit load of distractions to Trump's legal team.

The only thing that needs to be discussed, that is easily provable, is that the Dems have spent the last fucking year pushing

  • Mass unrequested mail in ballots
  • Drop boxes
  • No signature verification
  • No post mark checks

They have literally created a legal framework that makes it impossible to verify the chain of custody or legality of a ballot, and by extension the election. There is only one, very straightforward remedy, which is for the House to recognise that the state election results can't be accurately determined and for them to call the election themselves. This isn't something that the constitution allows, it is something that it requires. Only problem is this requires the GOP to display an unprecedented level of testicular fortitude, and everyone is chasing shadows instead of inundating their representatives with demands for them to do their fucking job.

11
BoJo 11 points ago +20 / -9

That's an article from before the election (verified using archive.org) putting the number of requests at 2.8 million. It means someone fucked up with Rudy's story unfortunately.

12
BoJo 12 points ago +13 / -1

Dude, haven't you heard of quantum theory?

0
BoJo 0 points ago +1 / -1

Very weird. When did you see that?

I just searched the nyt datasets up til the 10th and they weren't showing any results reported yet for that precinct.

1
BoJo 1 point ago +1 / -0

Detroit didn't report the absentee votes by precinct but by AVCB. Each AVCB has a few precincts. Overall Detroit's turnout was

506305 registered voters 83235 votes in person 174384 absentee

So 51% turnout.

5
BoJo 5 points ago +5 / -0

I'm genuinely not trying to be a downer here, but if you download the file from here -

https://www.waynecounty.com/elected/clerk/election-results.aspx

It doesn't look like Rudy is correct at all. There isn't a single precinct with more votes than registered voters.

13
BoJo 13 points ago +13 / -0

I was trying to explain it to my dad earlier today.

Imagine you have two dogs and you come home to find a big steaming pile of poo in the middle of the room. If one dog is pretending nothing happens and one dog is jumping up and down and demanding you watch the surveillance camera footage, it's pretty obvious what's going on. It gets even more obvious if you go to watch the video and the first dog goes mental and starts trying to break the TV.

1
BoJo 1 point ago +1 / -0

Hey, great work on this!

Can I check where you're getting precinct level data from? I've got a decent set of data ripped from nyt site json datasets but it's only timeseries for State, then totals for County. I want to start digging into timeseries for precinct level to see if I can spot where the Michigan/Wisconsin bumps came from.

Also I want to start trying to track down where all the Biden only ballots are. When precincts report results from a batch of ballots are they reporting all races from each ballot in that batch?

1
BoJo 1 point ago +2 / -1

I'm from the UK so I count myself as an amused observer in all of this.

Hand on heart, do you honestly look at videos of Joe Biden and think that is a man with the cognitive ability to do the job of President of the United States?

5
BoJo 5 points ago +5 / -0

If they need someone to volunteer to take one for the team and break an agreement...

1
BoJo 1 point ago +1 / -0

For me it's simple.

The guy is literally advocating denying 160-170 million American voters the opportunity to have confidence in the election process.

1
BoJo 1 point ago +1 / -0

Did you have Google location history on your phone when you voted?

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›