I still can't believe our political left actually now supports endless wars and the spies that lie us into them just to own Trump.
I'm sure the goatfuck army would be happy if we left these regions, especially if they're getting a role at the negotiating table. But if these groups represent a large portion of the population, what are we supposed to do? Keep artificially extending these civil wars that kill hundreds of thousands of civilians, and destabilizing the region even further? If supposed "democratic governments" can't exist on their own without foreign neolibs and MIC goons propping them up with American lives and trillions of dollars, what's the point? If Afghanistan's people don't want the Taliban, then they can get rid of them.
One easy way to tell when these stories are fake is that they always act like people on the outside can see their personal self-concept. You might guess she's partially black by looking at her, but she could just as easily be anything else. Even if there were roving gangs of white supremacists looking for black people to attack, they wouldn't be going for her and screaming the gamer word.
She clearly identifies with being black, regardless of how much she is, so she's convinced that everyone looks at her and sees her that way. She also thinks that floral print frat boy KKK members are an integral part of the black experience and it makes her more authentically black if she had a run-in with them.
Another example is how the racist gay-bashers in Juicy's story recognized him as a D-list actor from a C-list TV show aimed at a black audience. In his head the show is a big hit and everyone knows who he is.
It's a joke about the "party switch"/ "Southern Strategy" narrative. FDR was a liberal president that Democrats love, but he came from the 30's/40's, before the supposed realignment in the 60's. According to the narrative, Democrats were a racist party until the 60's and Republicans became a racist party after that.
The leftoid media thinks "law and order" is "racialized" or "dark" or "reactionary" or whatever, so maybe his consultants think it leaves him vulnerable to MSM counter-messaging where his message only gets reported with their BS filter on top.
But if he said "public safety" they'd say that's the new alt-right dog whistle. Or just say hE dIDnt KEeP uS SAfe fRoM muh GLOBAL PANDEMIC.
It doesn't matter what he says to them, so he shouldn't worry about what they say either.
If early/absentee/mail vote counts are leaked, that will fuck with turnout on election day. Better to count everything on election day. Make it a clearly stated rule that mail-in ballots have to arrive by election day and will be shredded if they don't. Tell people to send them early.
There's no reason they can't count everything on election night and give us our result by the morning, no matter how many mail ballots there are.
"Democrats are going to cheat" isn't a convincing narrative for Dems and Independents who don't already believe it.
But anyone should be able to understand that both Biden and Trump campaigns are signalling they expect a confused, disrupted election process with problems that will likely take weeks to resolve, and significant uncertainty about the outcome. Both sides are saying that there will be questions about the legitimacy of the process, especially if most of the late-counted ballots skew one way or the other.
Trump is saying that this is a bad thing that he wants to avoid. Biden is saying that this is a good/normal thing.
"Without evidence" getting spammed in every story about a conservative saying anything is such cancer. 80% of the time there is evidence but they're refusing to report it. The rest of the time it's an opinion and not something where clear evidence would point one way or the other.
Thought experiment: What if this turn of phrase was applied to leftoids' favorite issues?
"Protestors asserted, without evidence, that George Floyd's death was racially motivated"
"Trans activists stated, without evidence, that there is an epidemic of murders targeting transgender people"
"House Democrats claim, without evidence, that Trump colluded with Russia"
https://youtu.be/MKH6PAoUuD0 is the one that hit it big.
It's crazy because at this point it's clear that a large portion of the left--including much of the mainstream center-left--really does hate America. I always used to think that was just a meme, a smear that was useful but not seriously meant or believed by most people. Was there a time when things changed? Why is no one (IRL) talking about this?
If it was a bioweapon it was a really shitty one. Although that would make sense for a Chinese product, I think that everyone knows by now this was not a bioweapon. As far as I know Trump has not said anything to that effect, perhaps apart from speculation early on when no one knew shit.
The argument is that China and the WHO covered up the facts about COVID early on, kneecapping the rest of the world's ability to respond to it. China also placed more restrictions on travel within their country than they did on travel out of their country, allowing the virus to spread internationally. No idea if this was some big master plan--probably incompetence or indifference to others--but there should still be consequences.
Still, the biggest consequences should be for the fearmongers trying to say this kills 4% of the population, every city will turn into New York, etc.
He's the President, it's his house as long as he's in office. I don't see how it's any different than using Air Force One to fly for campaign events, or using the Rose Garden to host a press conference about your administration's successes.
No one would have given a shit about Obama using the WH to give a speech.
Q is a larp but the lizard people (metaphor) are terrified that ordinary people will start to learn of them and rise up. They have to brand anyone digging into the behavior of the elite as a crazy/violent conspiracy theorist. If someone looking for truth takes a wrong turn and says/does something dumb, that will be the story, and that will be the only story that goes out.
So I think people should back off Q, but I don't think Republicans should "condemn" it or allow normal people asking questions to be the enemy. Deflect the questions and ask why you're mad about some right-wing boomers on facebook who are already censored to hell, instead of organized leftists burning down small businesses and assaulting cops with impunity. If someone (real or false flag) does commit a crime condemn the criminal and focus back on the mass/organized violence that the left is covering for. There is no organized right-wing violence/looting/rioting. This contrast has to be drawn repeatedly.
This is a killshot, please put this line in an ad or something.