2
Borekk 2 points ago +2 / -0

It's exhausting keeping track of the list of people I should be annoyed with on a daily basis.

1
Borekk 1 point ago +1 / -0

I believe you meant 'awomen to that'.

4
Borekk 4 points ago +4 / -0

I think we've already laid the groundwork that "they" are willing to artificially inflate/publish whatever numbers they need for any given scenario to continue to drive the narrative.

2
Borekk 2 points ago +2 / -0

Hospitals would be in a world of hurt without health exchanges, drug information, etc.

1
Borekk 1 point ago +1 / -0

He's aired some concerns about the security and integrity of the platform. There was a verified / checkmarked account for CodeMonkeyZ on Parler (which I think requires a license or passport photo), but he has never signed up for an account. Also things like Parler needing a phone number, RUMOR of people needing to have last 4 of your SSN....things like that. He's talked about it before and Dan Bongino (which I have no ill will towards) keeps pushing back saying it's safe but not addressing the underlying concerns.

Not sure if it's true or not, but it popped up out of nowhere at a very opportune time right when people would flock to it, so at the very least I'd take a cautious approach.

https://twitter.com/CodeMonkeyZ/status/1337733300371111936

3
Borekk 3 points ago +3 / -0

The thing I worry about most is it going back to state legislatures. The second it's decided that the fate is in the hands of state legislatures, there are going to be angry BLM mobs on every front lawn threatening families and kids to bend to the mob's will. And we already know from history that DOJ isn't really getting involved, so these people will be left to fend for themselves.

26
Borekk 26 points ago +26 / -0

As a fellow Husker, 100% agree and approve of this message!

4
Borekk 4 points ago +4 / -0

I do have concerns that if/when it gets to that point, libs are going to go hardcore offensive against those select few legislatures to get them to bend. 'Choose Biden or we know where you live' kind of stuff. If YouTube/Twitter/et. al. are suppressing any info, the only in-their-face oemn they have is that mob of people picketting outside their house.

I hope the Legislators are able to overcome what I imagine are infinitely stressful odds aimed not only at them but families and do the right thing and bring the votes for Trump. They will 1000% need need support and solidarity from this community if it comes to that to show that they aren't alone in this fight.

4
Borekk 4 points ago +4 / -0

That 50m video he posted yesterday looked pretty heavily like it was shot in front of a green screen. And all of these court cases where he's making his case heard....it's been 100% from a phone/voice connection only. have a suspicion that he's not been at the actual White House for at least a few days and likely has some beefed up security in a basement/bunker/military base / carrier somewhere.

3
Borekk 3 points ago +3 / -0

I think if things escalate to that point, White House police doesn't worry too much about what color of hat you're wearing or sign you're carrying. They secure the area and worry about sorting through the details later.

5
Borekk 5 points ago +5 / -0

I wonder at what point does this site start to see mysterious DDOS or connectivity issues? Or hosting mistakes?

1
Borekk 1 point ago +1 / -0

Contrary to what the other side might think, I’d be just as disgusted if this type of stuff was done to republicans benefit. I want my candidate to win and I can accept if he doesn’t, but it needs to be on a fair playing field.

2
Borekk 2 points ago +2 / -0

Why wouldn't they think they could get away with it? There's an almost-complete media blackout on the entire thing other than this website and an occasional Fox segment. Other than that, a majority of the people do not see anything close to the amount of detail that this site kicks out.

5
Borekk 5 points ago +5 / -0

It's not an accident we don't have something like this. Robust VoterID plans will torpedo a lot of people at the top looking to gain money / power / both. Better to keep things vague and easier to put a thumb on the scale.

5
Borekk 5 points ago +5 / -0

Wonder if they’re trying to dominate the news cycle on the morning of the debate. Didn’t Bannon say they were dropping big news Thursday morning? Could just be prep to overshadow whatever that is.

5
Borekk 5 points ago +5 / -0

Hah!...thanks for providing. That facial shift from guns to "where does that put you with Roe"....immediate record-scratch in her brain. :)