You have to figure out how you're going to stop them from rigging future elections. They barely got away with rigging 2020. It was sloppy due to the massive Trump turnout. Now they know all the areas they almost got caught which they can tweak and no candidate will have a turnout anywhere near Trump which means no worries about having to inject enough votes to win.
Nothing else matters if you can't figure that shit out. You're just LARPing.
If you're older than 30 you've probably been called or called someone an "Indian Giver". It means giving something to someone and then demanding it back afterwards. It came from the common phenomenon of Indians trading and then wanting back the things they traded away.
For instance, Peter Minuit traded 60 guilders worth of goods to a sub tribe of the Lenape for the island of Manhattan.
Unfortunately, Indians and Europeans had a very different understanding of property rights and ownership. Minuit and the Dutch completed the agreement thinking they had bought the land. The Indians completed the agreement apparently thinking they were just loaning the land until they decided they wanted it back.
The Dutch settled and immediately began building log cabins and cultivating the land for agriculture.
Eventually the Indians came back around, saw the improvements white people had made, demanded the land back, and the disagreement escalated with the Dutch obviously beating the ever-loving shit out of the Indians. Don't bring rocks and arrows to a gun fight, eh?
This phenomenon repeated again and again.
So even when liberals accuse Europeans of a history of tearing up land contracts, remind them that this was nothing more than taking on a very Indian stance of land ownership. We all know how liberals love their perpetual indigenous victims.
It's quite ironic that we vilify Europeans for not honoring contacts with Indians when it could very well be argued that this behavior was learned from Indians themselves.
So yeah, that's the origin of Indian giver. When someone gives you something with you thinking it's now yours but then they want it back.
I saw someone share a political cartoon on FB which was a drawing of a milkmaid hauling two buckets of milk, fresh from a cow, with the words "Amy Coney Barrett" on her blouse. The character was saying "Time to turn back the clocks".
The cartoon was obviously meant to refer to the liberals thinking that Roe V Wade would be repealed.
And that got me thinking. Why do liberals regard abortion as progressive?
If anything, the further back in time you go, the more normal and accepted infanticide was. The Aztecs used to sacrifice children as nonchalantly as you and me crack eggs in the morning to make an omelette. One of the biggest child sacrifice graves was dug up on US soil, and was attributed to a Native American tribe. The further back in time you go, the cheaper human life was.
That said, wouldn't the logical evolution of human morality be to CHERISH and value all human life, ESPECIALLY that of the unborn?
Their thinking is so fucking warped.
Make sure to use the stream from NBC's website.
Hollywood fags have been giving NBC shit and telling them to run the town hall before or after Biden's. NBC stood strong and told them to pound sand.
Let the ratings absolutely demolish Biden's.
Still voting Trump. Still aware of the bullshit the left is capable of and will do.
But while atrocity after atrocity happens and not a damn thing is done, I can't keep coming to this site. I become enraged and feel my heartbeat increase drastically. The wiping of the phones was the bit that out me over the edge. I come here for real news but sadly, there haven't been real results and real consequences to the actions of the left.
I don't think I'm black pilled. I'm on the Trump train and haven't been more politically right in my life but there's a fine line between being black pilled and accepting reality as it is. If you accept reality is that losing hope? 4 years of non stop bullshit without a single person facing any sufficient consequences. Hope is a feeling of expectation and desire for a certain thing to happen. How can, after 4 years of nothing, any rational person still have an expectation of consequences? 4 years of banging our heads against the wall...
Things we know:
-Just about anything can trigger a false positive on a WuFlu test.
-The federal government compensates states for +WuFlu tests.
-Wearing a mask results in the person is re-breathing their own germs. Because the level of oxygen is reduced from wearing a mask, germs that would normally be wiped out in an oxygen-rich environment are replicating due to the less-oxygenated environment. Now, due to the mask, the number and variety of germs present in a mask wearer is increased.
-Now, when an obedient mask wearer is tested, the likelihood of a false positive result is increased.
-This will result in the states reporting elevated rates of +WuFlu to the government.
Why doesn't Trump just stop giving money to states for the positive cases of WuFlu?
In 1890, Robert Koch described the basis rules that scientists use to determine if an infectious organism causes a specific disease. These four rules are called "Koch's postulates."
-
The organism must be found in people with the disease and be absent in people without the disease.
-
The organism must be able to be grown from tissues or other specimens from the affected individual in the laboratory.
-
The organism must cause the disease when given to an unaffected healthy person.
-
The organism must again be grown from this second individual.
So if this hasn't been completed on the Kung Flu, if it's better been isolated, how do they even know what to make a vaccine for?
It's all bullshit. Start pushing back at people.
https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2006/06/republicans_celebrate_juneteen.html
To this day, Republicans owe their sometimes muddled message and inability to campaign effectively against the Democratic Party to their ignorance about the Reconstruction era. What they think they know is very much the product of history books written by Democrat professors.
Today, all Americans can celebrate 'Juneteenth' - commemorating the day in 1865 when slavery finally ended throughout the entire United States, as news of liberation spread to those still enshackled in Texas. Sadly, few people know that Juneteenth was a high water mark for African-Americans. All too soon after that great day, the Democratic Party defeated the Reconstruction policies of the Republican Party, postponing the civil rights movement for nearly a century.
An important fact which most history books ignore is that Abraham Lincoln's 1864 running mate was a Democrat, Andrew Johnson of Tennessee. And so after Lincoln's assassination, it was a Democrat who would be President of the United States for the first four years after the Civil War. That first President Johnson did all in his power to prevent blacks from experiencing Lincoln's 'new birth of freedom.'
It was in Texas where slavery finally ended. On June 19, 1865, U.S. troops commanded by General Gordon Granger landed at Galveston and brought some important news that the Democrats running the state had refused to tell their slaves, that they had been legally freed two years before by the Emancipation Proclamation. Gordon's famous General Order Number 3 read:
'The people of Texas are informed that in accordance with a Proclamation from the Executive of the United States, all slaves are free. This involves an absolute equality of rights and rights of property between former masters and slaves, and the connection heretofore existing between them becomes that between employer and free laborer.'
General Gordon then traveled around Texas to inform the African-Americans, still being held as slaves by their masters, that they were in fact free. Gordon was a zealous advocate for full civil rights for African-Americans. Too zealous, it turned out, for President Andrew Johnson. On August 6, 1865, just six weeks after his arrival, President Johnson relieved Gordon from command in Texas. That same month, Johnson removed from the South all African-Americans serving in the U.S. Army occupation forces.
Any official in the occupying U.S. Army who exerted himself too much in defense of African-Americans was out of a job. For this reason, Johnson dismissed the conscientious Phil Sheridan, who had sent General Gordon to Galveston, from command in Texas and Louisiana. Sheridan's replacement was General Winfield Hancock, who then allowed white supremacist thugs a free hand. So impressed were former rebels with the performance of Hancock that he would receive the support of the Solid South when he became the Democratic Party's Presidential candidate in 1880.
President Andrew Johnson campaigned against ratification of the 14th Amendment and vetoed the Republicans' Civil Rights Act of 1866. It was he who quashed Republican attempts to provide 'forty acres and a mule' to emancipated African-Americans. Andrew Johnson vetoed a bill to extend voting rights to African-Americans in the District of Columbia, saying he wanted a completely 'white man's government.' And in Johnson's racist mind, the civil rights hero Frederick Douglass was 'a damned scoundrel.'
Southern Democrats (the former Confederate rebels and President Johnson) exercised almost complete control over the post-Civil War South for two years after Appomattox. The Democrat state governments set up by the Andrew Johnson administration quickly reduced blacks to near slavery with the infamous 'black codes.' Not until March 1867, when they attained two-thirds majorities in Congress, were Republicans able to override Johnson's vetoes and enact their Reconstruction policies, beginning with the Reconstruction Act of 1867. Unfortunately, the two-year delay before the onset of Republican Reconstruction had enabled the Democrats to strengthen their grip on power and on African-Americans in the South.
As soon as they were back in power in the southern states, Democrats closed down most of the public school systems that Republican administrations had established for blacks as well as poor whites. Democrat-oriented terrorist organizations such as the Ku Klux Klan and the Knights of the White Camellia denied African-Americans their right to vote. In the South, where dozens of African-American had held elective office while Republicans were in power at the state level, the restoration of Democrat rule excluded African-Americans from politics.
Though tragic for the region as a whole, the triumph of the Democratic Party in the post-Civil War South proved especially devastating for African-Americans, who though legally free, found themselves once gain ruled by the same class of white southern Democrats who had been their slave masters just a few years before.