-2
BoughtByBloomberg -2 points ago +1 / -3

This isn't an inch.

This is indirect voter ID. No state issued voting slip? Then your vote doesn't get counted.. It would also eliminate fraud because we can directly compare houses visited with the voting record and if someone sees his name on there without them having voted they can file a complaint.

We would be able to see all the Democrat zombies without violating the anonymity of the vote like how they did with the mail in ballots where you had to mark which party you were voting for on the outside.

-3
BoughtByBloomberg -3 points ago +1 / -4

I'd agree to one type of mail in voting. The election officials go door to door to collect the vote. The vote comprises a sealed envelop with an ID printout issued by the state and another sealed envelope with the actual ballot. Each visit must be documented to show attempt to collect vote either from the person or from the mail box.

To count the vote the official must check the ID printout with the voter roll and only then can the other envelope be filed as an official vote. These envelopes are then put into the bins and opened on election day.

We will have a record of visited addresses. A record of who cast a vote we can compare with vote totals. An indirect form of voter ID that cannot be called "racist" by the Democrats as the state issues the ID based on voter rolls.

It's not perfect, but it's a step up of the current, show up and maybe we'll check you later.

1
BoughtByBloomberg 1 point ago +1 / -0

Think China. China is GREAT for the individual consumer. Slave labor. No environmental regulations. Just exploit people until their suicide into a net and fuck em.

But it's destroying the US manufacturing. You see economy = jobs. When shell likes them apples it means jobs are disappearing.

11
BoughtByBloomberg 11 points ago +12 / -1

75% of casualties in Democrat managed States, 80% of cases in Democrat manages Counties. 90% of lockdown problems coming from Democrat run cities.

3
BoughtByBloomberg 3 points ago +3 / -0

Blame the hippies. Instead of becoming entirely energy independent they scared people into not using nuclear and passed laws so shitty it's still causing a housing crisis to this day.

7
BoughtByBloomberg 7 points ago +7 / -0

It's actually gas for a QUARTER! A good ol' George Washington fresh from the mint. GALLON for a QUARTER in 1980's money.

4
BoughtByBloomberg 4 points ago +4 / -0

Not the same thing. Brent isn't the end all be all for oil products. You'd have to gear your entire industry into processing it and even then you'd still need some other crude blends to produce certain types of refined materials.

5
BoughtByBloomberg 5 points ago +5 / -0

Good for the consumer. But oil companies will collapse and the entire industry will have after shock effects throughout the stock market. You have any idea how much retirement funds and 401k are invested into oil?

What is good for the individual consumer can be terrible for the overall economy.

Eggs for 1 cent a piece is great news if you love eggs, but it also means the farm, packaging plant and grocer is not earning a profit on the products. And soon... supply dries up.

3
BoughtByBloomberg 3 points ago +3 / -0

Hillary could talk the talk but couldn't walk the walk.

So for 2020 the Democrats picked someone who fails at step 1.

8
BoughtByBloomberg 8 points ago +8 / -0

Imagine how well he'll do as the invisible president. Don't worry lefties. It just looks like Trump is still in office after 2020, but really it's Biden.

6
BoughtByBloomberg 6 points ago +6 / -0

Look at that. 2600 Democrat voters just moved to red states.

1
BoughtByBloomberg 1 point ago +1 / -0

good journalism

Every example from good journalism literally comes from independent journos these days. There is nothing to stop these people from publishing things through a media company but retain personal liability thus transferring their rights onto the publication.

Anyway I wouldn't mess with it regardless, but it is amusing to look back on history and see repeatedly the media lambasted as the shitheels they are.

1
BoughtByBloomberg 1 point ago +1 / -0

No but you didn't read the fine print!

In case of random excuse this document is null and void if the majority of people agree.

1
BoughtByBloomberg 1 point ago +1 / -0

lol Tuh FF NevEr MeaNT U 2 HaVE VerBaL ICBMS!

4
BoughtByBloomberg 4 points ago +4 / -0

Show bobs and vegana!

4
BoughtByBloomberg 4 points ago +4 / -0

Just put a piece of lettuce up for sale. Now you're an essential business like Walmart.

2
BoughtByBloomberg 2 points ago +2 / -0

Libel and slander are... but the standard employed to make it libel and slander is higher for a newspaper. They get special protection. You basically have to prove intent with them because them writing a story about you can cause a judge to view you as a public figure.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›