1
Bramble 1 point ago +1 / -0

95% support in party, 51%+ across the nation. We ARE the party, and we are the majority of the nation.

Although if we assume polling is off as much as approval ratings, that means GEOTUS has closer to a 60% approval.

2
Bramble 2 points ago +2 / -0

It's so fucking easy for anyone with a CS background.

You use a pseudorandom number generator with the salt being the ballot ID number. All ballots are then printed with their ID and the hash output from the generator.

You keep the seed for each election locked up next to the nuclear codes.

How do you verify if a ballot is real? Well punch in the ID, and the seed and BAM out comes the hash.

It's cryptographically secure, and once counting stops you can publish the seed so anyone can validate a ballot.

Count them all, throw out the illegal ones, arrest anyone who submitted an illegal ballot, and you're set.

However this only works if they don't get official ballots. This obviously won't stop other kinds of fraud.

1
Bramble 1 point ago +1 / -0

What I hate most is idiot Dems and CNN who just parrot "no evidence of fraud"

Well there was no evidence Al Capone was a crime boss, which is why it was so hard for him to be arrested. Voter fraud isn't just some moustache twirling villain. It's not even always a coordinated effort. It's a loose collection of people who are driving in the same direction.

1
Bramble 1 point ago +1 / -0

When dealing with systemic issues like this, most people wouldn't be in the k ow, but would simply be complicit, like the poll workers who will likely be overly generous to approving shady mail in ballots. Also most, and even Biden, won't have details about the ballot printing / filling operations.

To manufacture 300,000 ballots over the course of 2-3 months would only take a few dozen people, or a few orders from China. But we're talking about maybe 100-200 people across the entire democratic establishment, that know what's happening.

But likely any organized crime operation, the way to find it is to follow the money. People are paying for space, paying people for services.

Once the ballots are in the system, you just need to count on your party operators to not ask too many questions - easy to assume from a party of syncophants.

To combat this, you both need to be on the inside, and ALSO be actively looking for it. Most people have plausible deniability.

2
Bramble 2 points ago +2 / -0

Dominion voting is a Canadian company with an office in Denver.

It's time to liberate the source code.

1
Bramble 1 point ago +1 / -0

The mail in voting is also an issue. They pulled out ALL the stops this election. They wanted to take no risks - however that may have been the biggest risk they took. Cheating so blatantly that anyone who isn't just watching CNN would realize what's happening.

1
Bramble 1 point ago +1 / -0

I don't want revenge, I just want justice, transparency, and America first.

21
Bramble 21 points ago +21 / -0

If this election has taught me anything, it's that I need to register Dem, get my ass into the inner circle,s, and record everything.

2
Bramble 2 points ago +2 / -0

Where are they located? Might be time to drop a pineapple in their office

6
Bramble 6 points ago +6 / -0

The thousands they have only "Biden" marked, or just go look through the trash from the previous day to find all the trunk ballots

1
Bramble 1 point ago +1 / -0

How the fuck.

Look, even if this person somehow has the same name, and the same birth month as someone previously, there is no way this has happened THIS MANY TIMES to be a clerical errors.

A dozen instances I buy. Thousands I do not.

2
Bramble 2 points ago +2 / -0

Computers don't glitch like this. I've been a developer for 20+ years and never has shit like this happened

Imagine if the barcode readers at Target rung up the wrong item 10% of the time. There would be absolute hell to pay l.

1
Bramble 1 point ago +1 / -0

I write software. If every even every millionth request resulted in a fraudulent database entry, I'd be working weekends to fix it.

These motherfuckers did this intentionally.

9
Bramble 9 points ago +9 / -0

They were named in the spirit of reconciliation. At this point fucking nobody associates "Bragg" with a confederate general give me a break.

6
Bramble 6 points ago +6 / -0

In the video he literally says "these people requested a ballot, filled it out, and sent it in"

So yes, they all got the application, and requested a ballot.

1
Bramble 1 point ago +1 / -0

How is voting software not open source by law.

Voting machines should be required to be offline, open source (hardware and software), software signed and validated by security chip in the computer.

All ballots should have to be run through two different machines, and the machine counts have to agree for every box. Then they're sealed in case a recount is needed.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›