So this shows that clearly 230 was a part of their calculations with respect to their banning the President of the United States’ speech as an individual.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OkQgTY5_cF0
Moreover, it further shows that Section 230 is absolutely a threat to our national security. Like seriously? Now "Twitter" aka the Deep State, gets to decide how to control what is happening in the United States? ... Twitter knows better than the duly elected President of the United States?
When they chose to refuse to address the President of the United States' concerns with the national security threat of Section 230 in the NDAA it shows that if "they" {i.e. the Deeps State, Congress, and Big Tech} can do that to the President of the United States as an individual, then they can and intend to do that to the entire country. ...basically "suspend" the 1st Amendment of the United States, permanently. How did they get this "power"? Via congress by not removing section 230 from the NDAA.
https://twitter.com/ChelseaClinton/status/1328096263523487751 Now we need to go to Delaware and play this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MA8a2g6tTp0 through a megaphone on a loop.
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1327619654592892931
President Trump is exactly right, everybody knows.
Much like how The South worked tirelessly to maintain political power through slave power, particularly once the Democratic Party was created in 1828, today’s Democrats continue to use the same tactics and strategies to maintain political power. Everybody knows this is relegated to the realm of conspiracy theory, like so much of our history; but interestingly, in Lincoln’s “House Divided Speech” given in June 1858, he dealt with this very notion of political conspiracy to hold political power:
“We can not absolutely know that all these exact adaptations are the result of preconcert. But when we see a lot of framed timbers, different portions of which we know have been gotten out at different times and places and by different workmen . . . and when we see these timbers joined together, and see they exactly make the frame of a house or a mill, all the tenons and mortices exactly fitting, and all the lengths and proportions of the different pieces exactly adapted to their respective places, and not a piece too many or too few—not omitting even scaffolding—or, if a single piece be lacking, we can see the place in the frame exactly fitted and prepared to yet bring such piece in—in such a case, we find it impossible not to believe that . . . all understood one another from the beginning, and all worked upon a common plan or draft drawn up before the first lick was struck.”
Curiously, today, this concept of preconcert to defraud the American people of their vote, is even more out in the open and obvious through our view of the narratives of preconcert—where, for example, all mainstream media repeated the same narrative throughout the election. Moreover, they “paused” the counting of the ballots after Biden went night, night in the early morning hours of November 4th.
This is not an example of hive mind or group think, although that is what this preconcert creates; this is an example of a pre-agreed to plan of action to gain and maintain political power, with Big Tech, Media and Democrats all working in concert to ensure that our votes, no matter how many, could never be enough. Given all this ^^^^^
Someone please explain to me how President Trump did something that everyone said was impossible—gaining a full 10 million votes more than he had in 2016—and still, somehow that wasn’t enough? How can anyone—left, right, or center—argue that when President Trump inspired this:
https://twitter.com/i/status/1327430120357982208
Democrats can still deny the truth?
Everybody knows—even Democrats—that they were searching “election fraud punishment” two weeks before the election, in AZ, PA, MI, and GA, where it mattered most. Everybody knows… And that, perhaps, is the main reason that we are going to win. Everybody knows...