Technically Trump has appointed more than 500 judges in his first (of two consecutive) terms. I guarantee he put far more thought into his SCOTUS picks.
Also consider that even if this judge ruled in his favour the Dems would then appeal to SCOTUS anyways; in a fashion this judge just expedited it getting to the final round.
Israel has been under attack since the day it was formed, so your theoretical "if Israelis were being eradicated" is actually exactly what's been happening since 1948 and why Israel is taking the fight to the Arabs to finally stop it.
I hope his tweets today have bolstered your confidence. Keep in mind that some of his public persona is for the normies - an appearance of not knowing everything helps avoid the MSM/tech programming that he is a dictator.
JUSTICE BREYER, with whom JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR and JUSTICE KAGAN join, dissenting
...
found that New York’s regulations were “crafted based on science"
Meanwhile, the scientists at WHO:
We in the World Health Organization do not advocate lockdowns
https://nypost.com/2020/10/11/who-warns-against-covid-19-lockdowns-due-to-economic-damage/
Sotomayor with the truly brain damaged comments:
The Governor’s comments simply do not warrant an application of strict scrutiny under this Court’s precedents. Just a few Terms ago, this Court declined to apply heightened scrutiny to a Presidential Proclamation limiting immigration from Muslim-majority countries, even though President Trump had described the Proclamation as a “Muslim Ban,” ... If thePresident’s statements did not show “that the challenged restrictions violate the ‘minimum requirement of neutrality’ to religion,” ante, at 2 (quoting Lukumi, 508 U. S., at 533), it is hard to see how Governor Cuomo’s do
Not original source, sorry, but apparently it's being openly discussed in the hearing right now https://thedonald.win/p/11QS31KwY5/x/c/4DpKm5rD8WC
The official website https://www.electionreturns.pa.gov/ just goes to a FAQ page instead of the results where I assume this data was gotten from.
The lawsuit itself asks a judge to either declare Trump the winner of the state’s presidential election — through a state law allowing a court to declare winners in elections where evidence is presented that a person other than the defendant (in this case, Biden) received the largest number of votes — or to annul the results of the presidential election and prohibit the appointment of electors to cast the state’s six electoral votes.
That's a good state law to have
From OP's article:
the judge set a Dec. 3 hearing date and is allowing 15 depositions.
Save the date!
True, but the benefit of spreading the information of who he would have in his imaginary administration has already led to a few wild red pills of people realizing how dumb they were to vote for him (of the few real people that actually did).
Direct link to the affidavit: https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.gand.283580/gov.uscourts.gand.283580.7.1_2.pdf
Barr needs to be the first one on a helicopter.