It was. The people throwing around ‘glowie’, ‘don’t give them an excuse’ etc. were feds. It worked.
You no longer have a vote, so this works out well.
2A only ostensibly prevents the government from infringing on that right. If the government can and does infringe on that right (as well as others) without consequence, which it does, then those rights are de facto in the gift of the government.
Ultimately it is only fear of consequences which truly prevents a government infringing on God given rights, and the US government currently doesn’t fear any consequences. If the government is not held to the limits placed upon it in the Constitution, either by the courts or by We The People directly, then it really is just a piece of paper.
It’s wild that anyone can still take ‘Democrats vs Republicans’ seriously. It’s like being asked to believe that professional wrestling is a legit contest.
Ambiguously written, but I think the emphasis is supposed to be on ‘next Trump’. As in, ‘if we don’t address this issue, it’s going to be the issue which gets another Trump elected’.
Traded a monarchy then for an oligarchy now. I think getting rid of the oligarchy is going to prove far more difficult than getting rid of the monarchy was.
“So let me know when our government disarms us and lets the Mexicans fuck with us for a few years, while doing nothing.”
Yeah no way that would happen in America these days.
Sure, but this why he is ‘only’ a great President, and shouldn’t be compared to the giants of history.
Was this the first game with fans allowed back in? If so not really a surprise it sold out. It probably could have sold out twice over. It’s what happens to attendances once the novelty of ‘omg we’re allowed to do something’ has worn off.
THE WALL JUST GOT... YOU KNOW, YOU KNOW, THE THING!
The strange thing is it was the generation which fought WW2 which later went on to open the floodgates with mass immigration. There was virtually no non-white population in the UK until after the war (or during the war if you count the US military).
It’s almost like they’re trying to breed whites out of America.
“Our case is to be considered thus: that we have been under slavery; that's acknowledged by all; our very laws were made by our conquerors. And whereas it's spoken much of chronicles, I conceive there is no credit to be given to any of them: and the reason is because those that were our lords and made us their vassals would suffer nothing else to be chronicled.”
‘Refusing’ is correct when some other party is trying to coerce you into doing it.
Imagine still thinking they’re doing it for votes.
Yep. Everyone wants to ‘fight’ the symptoms because fighting the cause has too high a price.
The only purpose evidence and proof serves in a corrupt system in which both the media and courts are complicit in the corruption, is to let the oppressed know that they should start overthrowing their oppressors.
If you’re still waiting for the puppet media to acknowledge that, yes, the election was stolen, or for the courts to intervene, or for those in power to ever allow a fair election sometime in the future, you’re going to be waiting forever.
I say I won’t take it until every black person in the world has been vaccinated. If other white people want to abuse their white privilege to get it ahead of starving Africans that’s up to them, but I won’t be part of it.
Isn’t most employment in the US ‘at-will’? If so, then the scenario this makes possible in the UK (employers able to legally fire employees for not taking the vaccine) already exists in the US.
Isn’t their race -like gender, height etc.- whatever they decide it is? How can we determine that from a photograph?
The premise is false, because there’s only one party.
It’s almost as if they know any shortfall in profit due to a boycott will be made good via taxpayer-funded subsidies...
AstraZeneca Macht Frei
The Uniparty Brownshirts are above the law, and they know it.