1
BurnerAcct42069 1 point ago +1 / -0

Thats not the lefts narrative - thats the way we interpret the lefts narrative. The left doesnt think about it they way we do, they are genuine black supremacists (or pretend to be). Both approaches against them are effective in different ways

9
BurnerAcct42069 9 points ago +9 / -0

But but but... Theyll just buy it from other countries! As if theres an infinite supply of food in the world and brazil and ukraine have 1.5B people worth of food just sitting around

4
BurnerAcct42069 4 points ago +5 / -1

That was a cabal sacrifice

3
BurnerAcct42069 3 points ago +3 / -0

What needs to happen is some michigan pedes log into minecraft with their arms and find the michigan cops' avatars, then find out which they care more about - going home to see their families, or giving their lives to protect the egos and corruption ofpeople who dont give a single fuck about them for a paycheck

4
BurnerAcct42069 4 points ago +4 / -0 (edited)

Compare the average ages. Do you think its unusual for 80+ year old to die?

3
BurnerAcct42069 3 points ago +3 / -0

Im surprised it hasnt evolved into 'making black people fill out a ballot with choices is racist and triggering since the non-dem candidates are basically kkk members, so only dems are allowed on ballots'

1
BurnerAcct42069 1 point ago +1 / -0

So she didnt officially sponsor a resolution to prevent use of military orce in Syria on november 30 2019? Ok

1
BurnerAcct42069 1 point ago +1 / -0

They rolled the PA legislature vs governor case into this one. Now theyre saying the plaintiffs dont have standing, WHEN ONE OF THE PLAINTIFFS IS THE STATE LEGISLATURE

5
BurnerAcct42069 5 points ago +5 / -0

So they rolled the PA case where the legislature was suing the executive into this one, then dismiss this one because TX doesnt have standing in PA. Did they fucking forget that the PA legislature sued for the same reason? Does the PA legislature not have standing in how their own state conducts and election?

2
BurnerAcct42069 2 points ago +2 / -0

Didnt they basically threaten to riot?

3
BurnerAcct42069 3 points ago +3 / -0

What needs to happen is 'platforms' are treated as utilities and cannot discriminate unless there is a violation of a statute (ie kiddy porn). In return they have looser standards for mergers etc (facebook was allowed to acquire instagram). If the tech oligarchy wants to play god with the content posted on their sites then they are publishers and need to operate independently as well as be held liable for the content they source from their users

11
BurnerAcct42069 11 points ago +11 / -0

My mom cancelled her Time subscription years ago and she still gets a copy every week

-1
BurnerAcct42069 -1 points ago +1 / -2

Took 5 seconds of googling to disprove your 1st point - that was the main attacking point against her last year. Everyone knows the rest already. No one who doesnt believe in lefty values is voting for tulsi gabbard because she actually believes what she says about them instead of just pretending to support 'the cause' for personal gain

0
BurnerAcct42069 0 points ago +1 / -1 (edited)

Theres an enormous difference between respecting someone and agreeing with them. I would never vote for tulsi gabbard but id rather have her in office than biden or kamala or bernie because we know she stands for something genuine. She got attacked by the msm because shes not a new world order puppet

view more: Next ›