4
Bushydoofus 4 points ago +4 / -0

absolutely, no way this 80 IQ doofus created an elaborate fake video for his personal tiktok

5
Bushydoofus 5 points ago +5 / -0

I can't help myself, every man has to make this decision for himself.

3
Bushydoofus 3 points ago +4 / -1

100%, it's easier for a reasonable person to believe it's real than it is for them to believe it's fake.

3
Bushydoofus 3 points ago +3 / -0

The guy is clearly on the job at what looks like maybe a USPS facility and the appearance of fraud is obvious for all to see. If it's fake, he still has the appearance and the means of committing fraud, nobody can defend that and he would be fired.

1
Bushydoofus 1 point ago +1 / -0

Interesting that Mitch is speaking right now. Maybe Barr said something to brief him about how the efforts are going.

38
Bushydoofus 38 points ago +39 / -1

He's so bitter about being fired when he came on the scene and made a fool of himself.

5
Bushydoofus 5 points ago +5 / -0

Will they even call it by January 20th??

1
Bushydoofus 1 point ago +1 / -0

Only show I watch is Tucker my dude. I just was thinking if we all are boycotting Fox, but some people are unwilling to plunge completely, the few people who subscribe to that shit should unsubscribe.

1
Bushydoofus 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's not real.

3
Bushydoofus 3 points ago +4 / -1

It amazes me how long it takes people to see things others saw 4 days ago.

1
Bushydoofus 1 point ago +1 / -0

I've been getting nonstop texts from him (the campaign using his name) asking for donations to the Trump legal fund. Pence has always been a low key guy, but I think I saw him the other day on a show coming out against this shit.

9
Bushydoofus 9 points ago +9 / -0

To be fair, John James is nationally popular and a good number of those might be non Michigan residents, but that's not to say all of peters' followers are Michiganders either.

1
Bushydoofus 1 point ago +1 / -0

Do you have another way to prove this to the 80 people I spammed this to?

2
Bushydoofus 2 points ago +2 / -0

Your kids shouldn't even know who Joe Biden or Donald Trump are. Let them have a childhood for christ sakes.

1
Bushydoofus 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'm sorry, give me the TLDR, I'm not ready to go to sleep yet. VDH is so boring.

1
Bushydoofus 1 point ago +1 / -0

I guarantee you there are plenty of uncured republican ballots that sat idly in PA, GA, WI, MI, and elsewhere that never officially were cast. If that turns out to be true, it's political malpractice on a ridiculous scale and it could single handedly be the cause of those states going the other way. Every other state went 60-40 or 70-30 split in favor of Biden, but the key is that Trump still got a decent enough share to protect his lead, especially in PA where his lead was 700k. Blame would rest squarely on the RNC's shoulders if this turned out to be true.

1
Bushydoofus 1 point ago +1 / -0

If this isn't proof of mail-in voting being a vehicle by which the election could be stolen, I don't know what is. The CDC even urged people to go vote on election day, like what?

1
Bushydoofus 1 point ago +1 / -0

We need to see the party breakdown of the remaining incomplete ballots that have not been "cured". I guarantee you they're ALL Republican.

1
Bushydoofus 1 point ago +1 / -0

They created a system where they knew how to game it and republicans were robbed blind. This is not how a fair and open election should play out. It's more about who can game the system more than the will of the people.

1
Bushydoofus 1 point ago +1 / -0

The issue was a handful of states didn't start counting until election day, and they obviously found tons of votes that were incomplete, hence the need for their ballot curing. I guarantee you no republican ballots were "cured" by these Dem PAC canvassers. That means there are potentially millions of republican ballots without signatures that never got cured. We need to audit the incomplete ballots in these states.

1
Bushydoofus 1 point ago +1 / -0

I think the "ballot curing" after election day will be viewed very negatively. Basically, they had three months to correct ballots with missing signatures, but after election day, they hunted down the unacceptable ballot people and got them to complete their ballots, creating new votes after election day. There are also allegations of back-dating ballots received after November 3rd to show them as being received prior to November 3rd

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›