None examined the evidence. Most dismissed on a technical basis, mostly lack of standing. The few that actually pretended to read the full filings demanded 100% undisputed proof where the legal standard for a full hearing is probable cause, in violation of their duty.
It is their strategy. When the existence of Hunter's laptop first came into the public eye, they said it was already debunked (before it was known) and they said the same about all of the vote fraud. An honest and or at least sentient media would have called that out as not possible.
But it is OK to attack the Whit House injuring 60 secret service agents and police https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2020/05/31/george-floyd-dc-protests-arrests-officers-injured/5300339002/
So it was an armed sandwich rebellion.