1
CS_McFisticuffs_III 1 point ago +1 / -0

Might be able to skip step 1. I don't think the rules actually require the Speaker to be a member of the House.

1
CS_McFisticuffs_III 1 point ago +1 / -0

Not sure that's the case. American spacecraft and facilities would fall under American jurisdiction. That might, unfortunately, include the EPA.

1
CS_McFisticuffs_III 1 point ago +1 / -0

The media tells them what to think and they can't imagine anything different.

1
CS_McFisticuffs_III 1 point ago +1 / -0

Her concession was irrelevant. The real difference was that they didn't cheat enough to make it look like she had won.

3
CS_McFisticuffs_III 3 points ago +3 / -0

What's scary is how many of them don't even comprehend the contradiction when you point it out.

4
CS_McFisticuffs_III 4 points ago +4 / -0

Do you have a version where it's ordered based off Biden's vote totals? I'm curious how it would look in comparison.

Ordering based on relative party registration might also be useful.

15
CS_McFisticuffs_III 15 points ago +15 / -0

18 U.S.C. § 912:

Whoever falsely assumes or pretends to be an officer or employee acting under the authority of the United States or any department, agency or officer thereof, and acts as such, or in such pretended character demands or obtains any money, paper, document, or thing of value, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.

2
CS_McFisticuffs_III 2 points ago +2 / -0

Honestly, I doubt most people would even bother to check. Knowing that the option exists would go a long way towards reassuring voters.

2
CS_McFisticuffs_III 2 points ago +2 / -0

I mean seeing who you voted for. It isn't enough to just prevent people from seeing it without your permission. For a secret ballot to work, there must be no way for anyone else to know for certain how you voted, even if you want them to.

1
CS_McFisticuffs_III 1 point ago +1 / -0

He could say that because he was the president. I suspect the current president would be willing to cooperate with the court on this matter.

1
CS_McFisticuffs_III 1 point ago +1 / -0

Booths at secure locations, maybe courthouses, where people can go in one at a time and verify their votes.

1
CS_McFisticuffs_III 1 point ago +1 / -0

You would also need to control who can view the data once the password is entered. Maybe something like single person booths at secure locations like courthouses or other government buildings.

2
CS_McFisticuffs_III 2 points ago +2 / -0

In my area, they don't let people have their phones out at the voting booth for this exact reason.

1
CS_McFisticuffs_III 1 point ago +1 / -0

The measurement has more significant figures than the law, and should be rounded to the nearest tenth.

view more: Next ›