48
Cantshadowbanthemall 48 points ago +48 / -0

No, the CDC specifically said masks dont do shit:

Cdc:

During March 1–December 31, 2020, state-issued mask mandates applied in 2,313 (73.6%) of the 3,142 U.S. counties. Mask mandates were associated with a 0.5 percentage point decrease (p = 0.02) in daily COVID-19 case growth rates 1–20 days after implementation and decreases of 1.1, 1.5, 1.7, and 1.8 percentage points 21–40, 41–60, 61–80, and 81–100 days, respectively, after implementation (p<0.01 for all) (Table 1) (Figure). Mask mandates were associated with a 0.7 percentage point decrease (p = 0.03) in daily COVID-19 death growth rates 1–20 days after implementation and decreases of 1.0, 1.4, 1.6, and 1.9 percentage points 21–40, 41–60, 61–80, and 81–100 days, respectively, after implementation (p<0.01 for all). Daily case and death growth rates before implementation of mask mandates were not statistically different from the reference period.

2
Cantshadowbanthemall 2 points ago +2 / -0

Well you see, when high levels of the Intel community got there because of their ties to the 5 Families of China, they won't find any wrongdoing

1
Cantshadowbanthemall 1 point ago +1 / -0

Not a fan of a guy who got his teeth punched out for kicking someone's dog, twice.

1
Cantshadowbanthemall 1 point ago +1 / -0

They jerked off to the contents and called it a day obv

6
Cantshadowbanthemall 6 points ago +6 / -0

I looked down, it now looks like I've been swimming in a frozen lake

1
Cantshadowbanthemall 1 point ago +2 / -1

Cdc:

During March 1–December 31, 2020, state-issued mask mandates applied in 2,313 (73.6%) of the 3,142 U.S. counties. Mask mandates were associated with a 0.5 percentage point decrease (p = 0.02) in daily COVID-19 case growth rates 1–20 days after implementation and decreases of 1.1, 1.5, 1.7, and 1.8 percentage points 21–40, 41–60, 61–80, and 81–100 days, respectively, after implementation (p<0.01 for all) (Table 1) (Figure). Mask mandates were associated with a 0.7 percentage point decrease (p = 0.03) in daily COVID-19 death growth rates 1–20 days after implementation and decreases of 1.0, 1.4, 1.6, and 1.9 percentage points 21–40, 41–60, 61–80, and 81–100 days, respectively, after implementation (p<0.01 for all). Daily case and death growth rates before implementation of mask mandates were not statistically different from the reference period.

14
Cantshadowbanthemall 14 points ago +14 / -0

No they work for blocking arterial blood spray into your mouth

1
Cantshadowbanthemall 1 point ago +1 / -0

Asians know it isn't white people.

1
Cantshadowbanthemall 1 point ago +1 / -0

Baby girls will often have a menses because their hormone level is so high, this is likely when differentiation happens

3
Cantshadowbanthemall 3 points ago +3 / -0

Just a reminder: they're faggots.

They aren't smart, what asshole would take their shit salary? 60k starting as an agent requiring either sucking nepotistic dick or being an accountant / software dev.

Think about that number. Accounting or software dev, $60k. That's starting at big 4 and they get raises to above 100k pretty quickly. Consultants more.

So clearly they can't hack it in business. Their diversity hire rate is astronomical. Their culture is fucking toxic. Most are asbergers to some degree, same is true of any intelligence branch.

3
Cantshadowbanthemall 3 points ago +3 / -0

Imagine being so brainwashed you think masks work...

Cdc: During March 1–December 31, 2020, state-issued mask mandates applied in 2,313 (73.6%) of the 3,142 U.S. coun- ties. Mask mandates were associated with a 0.5 percentage point decrease (p = 0.02) in daily COVID-19 case growth rates 1–20 days after implementation and decreases of 1.1, 1.5, 1.7, and 1.8 percentage points 21–40, 41–60, 61–80, and 81–100 days, respectively, after implementation (p<0.01 for all) (Table 1) (Figure). Mask mandates were associated with a 0.7 percentage point decrease (p = 0.03) in daily COVID-19 death growth rates 1–20 days after implementation and decreases of 1.0, 1.4, 1.6, and 1.9 percentage points 21–40, 41–60, 61–80, and 81–100 days, respectively, after implementation (p<0.01 for all). Daily case and death growth rates before implementa- tion of mask mandates were not statistically different from the reference period.

1
Cantshadowbanthemall 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yet they signature verify every one, and still require masks despite the following from the CDC:

During March 1–December 31, 2020, state-issued mask mandates applied in 2,313 (73.6%) of the 3,142 U.S. coun- ties. Mask mandates were associated with a 0.5 percentage point decrease (p = 0.02) in daily COVID-19 case growth rates 1–20 days after implementation and decreases of 1.1, 1.5, 1.7, and 1.8 percentage points 21–40, 41–60, 61–80, and 81–100 days, respectively, after implementation (p<0.01 for all) (Table 1) (Figure). Mask mandates were associated with a 0.7 percentage point decrease (p = 0.03) in daily COVID-19 death growth rates 1–20 days after implementation and decreases of 1.0, 1.4, 1.6, and 1.9 percentage points 21–40, 41–60, 61–80, and 81–100 days, respectively, after implementation (p<0.01 for all). Daily case and death growth rates before implementa- tion of mask mandates were not statistically different from the reference period.

1
Cantshadowbanthemall 1 point ago +1 / -0

Senate Republicans: give us money else we vote for this

1
Cantshadowbanthemall 1 point ago +1 / -0

Cdc: During March 1–December 31, 2020, state-issued mask mandates applied in 2,313 (73.6%) of the 3,142 U.S. coun- ties. Mask mandates were associated with a 0.5 percentage point decrease (p = 0.02) in daily COVID-19 case growth rates 1–20 days after implementation and decreases of 1.1, 1.5, 1.7, and 1.8 percentage points 21–40, 41–60, 61–80, and 81–100 days, respectively, after implementation (p<0.01 for all) (Table 1) (Figure). Mask mandates were associated with a 0.7 percentage point decrease (p = 0.03) in daily COVID-19 death growth rates 1–20 days after implementation and decreases of 1.0, 1.4, 1.6, and 1.9 percentage points 21–40, 41–60, 61–80, and 81–100 days, respectively, after implementation (p<0.01 for all). Daily case and death growth rates before implementa- tion of mask mandates were not statistically different from the reference period.

by HanLoco
4
Cantshadowbanthemall 4 points ago +4 / -0

SF is totally fucked right now.

I live in the area, houses in that literal shit hole were selling for $1.7M, now that same house is $1.2, a tax basis loss of 30%

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›