that is something that happens with certain evil entities
Hard to be f.... ing if not in person.
Squatter regime Squatter and Vice Squattress
Jesus is the only solution for all of us.
hang hang hang hang hang on.... someone reposted yesterday's on Rumble
if you're confusion about that, whole he ballz!
TechnoFog goes into reasons she threw it back. Giving more ammo putting up sloppy bills doesn't help us.
God bless Guo!
Heidi St John is also running. She is MAGA as well. http://heidistjohnforcongress.com/
People are stepping up locally, which is terrific.
Heidi said she would need to raise about $7M. If you support Joe he'll need to get some green as well.
RESPONSE TO THE FAKE NEWS ATTACKS ON SIDNEY POWELL
FREE SPEECH
-
This defamation lawsuit is yet another attempt to silence critics and citizens who want to investigate voter fraud. The statements Dominion claims are defamatory are actually protected speech under the First Amendment because they deal with matters of public concern, i.e., election integrity. The Fake News media and their allies are spinning meritless claims because their arguments have neither the facts nor the law needed to hold up in a courtroom.
-
The statements complained of are also protected because Dominion is a public figure and must prove that Ms. Powell acted with malice. This is impossible, as Ms. Powell’s lawyer has explained, because Ms. Powell’s statements were based on sworn affidavits, declarations, expert reports and documentary evidence. She presented this evidence for all to see in four court filings and on her website.
FAKE NEWS
-
Contrary to what the Fake News is pushing, Sidney did NOT claim in court that ‘no reasonable person would believe her claims’. The press is using twisted legalese and manipulating the legal standard to confuse the issue, as they have done before in other high-profile cases. Ms. Powell’s statements were legal opinions that she stands behind, as they were based on sworn affidavits, declarations, expert reports and documentary evidence.
-
Dominion claims that the evidence Ms. Powell relied upon to assert her claims concerning the lack of election integrity is incredible and not believable. Ms. Powell responded by pointing out that her assertions were her legal opinions based on the evidence she presented to four different courts. Accordingly, her statements are not subject to challenge under defamation law.
short for raccoon for my whole life in the midwest
thank you because I did a crap job masking it out this morning for future clownshittery and this is SUPERB!
no, they need our prayers, they are demonized addicts and special kinds of stupid
thank you, I do intel for some independent journos this will interest them
moblizing calls and support is important to GET wins and encourage persistence
Wxm h8 orade!
emailed nicely to let them know I will choose other independent journalists and they can go the way of Fox
We hope he bugged out and got to a safe space closer to faster interwebz. They left his stream on as a honeypot - easy to clip and create sound bites and lots of engagement to filter for radical comments
We don't have to be sure about anything. We pursue the truth. Go find a flag and recite the pledge.. you'll feel better.
Navarro report has a figure on votes for Biden only... he cheated extra in select zones.
After the House hearing I don't think we can count on them being allowed to present evidence. They are not using the 'Clinton rules' the game is still changing. Keep the focus on the legislatures and they can produce even more definitive evidence if they can get to the machine data audits and ballot audits.
https://odysee.com/@SaltyCracker:a/reeeestream4:4