5
Centipe76 5 points ago +5 / -0

Right. All they need is a bar or qr code to stop that. Basically it is a very exploitable system that overlooks major attack vectors in the name of 'the workers should be 100% honest' which is never true and why you would want a 'secure' system in the first place. Basically admitting that his product fills no need.

5
Centipe76 5 points ago +5 / -0

Yes. They design a system that is very exploitable and relies on 'honest workers'. Which is like saying, we don't put locks on our doors, it's up to your community to be free of bad actors.

2
Centipe76 2 points ago +3 / -1

These people are obviously not experts but they are at least (although retardedly) demonstrating by their questioning that they see something wrong. So, at least the politicians know something is crooked or off.

7
Centipe76 7 points ago +7 / -0

FINALLY THIS DUDE ASKED A REAL QUESTION AND HAS HIM CORNERED. CEO'S PUNTING.

1
Centipe76 1 point ago +1 / -0

Boom. He just asked that exact question. CEO punted to election officials. However, it is out in the open now that this is a super easy exploit.

1
Centipe76 1 point ago +1 / -0

This guy has some understanding. He's asking if they adjudicate via software then the ballot scanner is network connected to the adjudication software. If the adjudication software is connected to the internet (WAN) then someone could remote in and remotely adjudicate ballots- and that the ballot scanner is therefore accessible from the www.

15
Centipe76 15 points ago +15 / -0

The problem here is that you have lawmakers grilling a tech CEO. They have not chance of getting any good info. They should have a subject matter expert (one of the people who audited these systems and found ways to manipulate the vote before the election) grill this shit-head. Politicians need to realize they are not much better than knuckle-draggers, let the real smarties do the questioning.

4
Centipe76 4 points ago +4 / -0

Fist bump. It comes in bunches, not uniform an linerarily.

2
Centipe76 2 points ago +2 / -0

Big cities reporting retard.

1
Centipe76 1 point ago +1 / -0

C'mon homosexuals. Is the internet really this limp dicked?

1
Centipe76 1 point ago +1 / -0

How about those senators waive off our debt. They're the fucks that created it by selling out our country.

1
Centipe76 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yeah, there are hundreds of shots hitting the water all around the boat for like 5 minutes. Then, cut to a shot of the boat on fire. Lol. It's like they completely missed so they just set to boat on fire and put it in the video to save face.

1
Centipe76 1 point ago +2 / -1

It's like one of those large buttons on stupid decorative pillows.

3
Centipe76 3 points ago +3 / -0

How about just stop this quarantine bullshit and only require people over 65 with serious preexisting conditions quarantine? You know, the only people who could die from it, same as with the standard flu?

https://informationisbeautiful.net/visualizations/covid-19-coronavirus-infographic-datapack/

1
Centipe76 1 point ago +3 / -2

What does it matter if it does? Most people won't even develop a cough, some will for a few days. Only people over 65 and serious preexisting conditions should care.

https://informationisbeautiful.net/visualizations/covid-19-coronavirus-infographic-datapack/

8
Centipe76 8 points ago +8 / -0

I just got back from shopping and basically anything that someone who doesn't know how to cook is purchased. If it's in plastic it's been purchased.

4
Centipe76 4 points ago +4 / -0

I think it was only 4 people too. Could be wrong on that but that's what I heard on the radio.

Edit: I mean the entire sample size was 4 people.

3
Centipe76 3 points ago +6 / -3

The people are people, mostly old people with multiple serious medical conditions already present. Same would happen with the flu.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›