Right. All they need is a bar or qr code to stop that. Basically it is a very exploitable system that overlooks major attack vectors in the name of 'the workers should be 100% honest' which is never true and why you would want a 'secure' system in the first place. Basically admitting that his product fills no need.
This guy has some understanding. He's asking if they adjudicate via software then the ballot scanner is network connected to the adjudication software. If the adjudication software is connected to the internet (WAN) then someone could remote in and remotely adjudicate ballots- and that the ballot scanner is therefore accessible from the www.
The problem here is that you have lawmakers grilling a tech CEO. They have not chance of getting any good info. They should have a subject matter expert (one of the people who audited these systems and found ways to manipulate the vote before the election) grill this shit-head. Politicians need to realize they are not much better than knuckle-draggers, let the real smarties do the questioning.
Yeah, there are hundreds of shots hitting the water all around the boat for like 5 minutes. Then, cut to a shot of the boat on fire. Lol. It's like they completely missed so they just set to boat on fire and put it in the video to save face.
How about just stop this quarantine bullshit and only require people over 65 with serious preexisting conditions quarantine? You know, the only people who could die from it, same as with the standard flu?
https://informationisbeautiful.net/visualizations/covid-19-coronavirus-infographic-datapack/
What does it matter if it does? Most people won't even develop a cough, some will for a few days. Only people over 65 and serious preexisting conditions should care.
https://informationisbeautiful.net/visualizations/covid-19-coronavirus-infographic-datapack/
https://www.citypopulation.de/en/italy/admin/03__lombardia/
Over half of the population of Lombardy is 65+. Always have to put things into perspective.
They don't. See Antrim Cty audit.