2
Charnathan 2 points ago +4 / -2

Exactly. It would free states on the issue.

4
Charnathan 4 points ago +5 / -1

Voting has already begun, so it's now or never. I think uniparty war on drugs special interests preclude this outcome.

46
Charnathan 46 points ago +46 / -0

If that isn't the face of contempt of congress, then I don't know what is.

1
Charnathan 1 point ago +1 / -0

They took the breathing tube out within a day and have a nazel resperator assisting him with a few extra breaths a minute at normal o2 levels. They say he has had a good first few days. He has been having heart variances today, but they assured me that is normal for babies his size and that it's not anything for me to worry about at this point, but I still do.

8
Charnathan 8 points ago +8 / -0

Thank you. My little lion was born one day shy of 25 weeks. Stories like these are really helpful in keeping my head on straight.

8
Charnathan 8 points ago +8 / -0

He was my first choice in 2016, but we all know only Trump could beat the deep state and fake news at their own game while they were being run by Obama's civil servants. I'm glad he has POTUS' ear and still have hopes for 2024.

Obamagate proves Rand knew wtf he was talking about.

15
Charnathan 15 points ago +15 / -0

But they would have to bring it back to vote to override Trump's veto, and then voters would know exactly who is on the Trump train and who is a swamp creature. If they can do this to a sitting pres, they can do it to ANYONE.

20
Charnathan 20 points ago +20 / -0

Good. I'm all for law and order. I'm also all for cops not killing handcuffed perps, even if they pissed a cop off. He's on the correct side of this one for the election indeed. Kanye be like DRAGON ENERGY

6
Charnathan 6 points ago +6 / -0

POTUS swinging his bawls around the launch pad before launch just like I like it. More than 0bama ever did.

14
Charnathan 14 points ago +16 / -2

I mean, I'm no fan of his, but at least the COTS program and commercial crew program were started under his administration that gave private space companies a real chance at proving their efficiency against the legacy government/politics central approach. I don't think it was intentional, but it did happen. The intent was for the US government to show that they are as good/better than the Russians, but by SpaceX stomping Boeing in this program, it proved that private enterprise and entrepreneurs are more than capable of providing the services required that exceed legacy capabilities at a fraction of the cost.

What I DO fault 0bama(And Senator Shelby and his pals) is over funding the wasteful SLS monstrosity while starving commercial crew program of vital funds for years. This was supposed to happen in 2015. Instead of properly funding our own space program, he funded the Russians for an extra 5 years. For all this "RUSSIA RUSSIA RUSSIA" NPC hysteria, it seems like 0bama was the one giving them the advantage(not even talking about Uranium One).

0
Charnathan 0 points ago +1 / -1

Im not acting as an attorney. Im making my own observations based on publicly available evidence. I saw evidence that they gunned down a man who was not threatening violence against anyone until approached and threatened by armed men. Let me know when you have evidence that he committed a felony or that they had valid reason to think he was a danger. I'll wait.

The real question is why are you batting so hard for the guys who took the law into their own hands? Our POTUS is the POTUS of law and order. This does not appear legal or orderly.

You do realize that McMichael's have been charged with murder? It's up to a jury of their peers at a fair trial.... a trial that Arbery never got.

0
Charnathan 0 points ago +1 / -1

Because just like for our POTUS with RUSSIAGATE, and Kavanaugh's confirmation headaches, I believe in innocent until proven guilty. We can't have it both ways just because the violent left is trying to use this to ignite a race war. The burden of proof is on the accusers. No proof has been presented to me that he committed a felony, so I have to assume he did not until evidence emerges showing otherwise. Nothing was even taken from the house according to reports from the owner. I'll be confident that he committed a felony when evidence is presented that he committed a felony. Reports I've read even said there were no recent break ins in the area. Fake news is rampant and of course it's possible that I don't have all the facts, but I haven't seen evidence of anything different.

Bottom line is I don't want to live in a country/world where it's okay for any random citizens to gun down people in the streets because they think someone MAY have committed [non-violent] petty crime. The threshold of when you can threaten someone's life needs to be pretty fucking high because unlike the violent left, I value life and support individual rights, as did John Adams.

https://www.theclassroom.com/did-john-adams-defend-british-soldiers-11549.html

0
Charnathan 0 points ago +1 / -1

It was not a valid citizens arrest. It is only valid if he committed a felony, which he did not. He didn't go after a gun until it was pointed at him, so he was the one acting in self defense. He didn't chase them down with a gun. They chased him down with a gun.

0
Charnathan 0 points ago +1 / -1

At risk of being further down voted for being a voice of reason, rather than just "batting for the team"... if someone pointed a gun at you while you were just running down the street knowing that you did not just commit a felony, are you really just going to let two random dudes with no obvious legal authority hold you at gunpoint for no reason? If I were carrying and someone pointed a gun at me, you better believe I'm not just gunna roll over and wet myself.

Again, dude was a delinquent. There is plenty of evidence of that. There is no evidence that he deserved death or the threat of death for anything he did that day. Call the cops. Follow him if they really want to, but running up to someone and threatening someone's life because you suspect they may have committed a petty crime is absolutely not justified and self defense from unknown assailants threatening your life is WHY the second amendment exists.

How would this story had played out if he was packing and did off the guys pointing guns at him? He wasn't the one running them down. Wouldn't he have just been "standing his ground"? At no time did he threaten anyone's life so his life did not deserve to be threatened. If he were robbing a liquor store at gun point, then sure, hold him at gun point and/or pump him full of lead. That isn't what happened here. He was hunted down, threatened, and executed for looking suspicious(of trespassing a vacant property). They had no proof when they pulled that trigger that he was in fact guilty of anything and wasn't authorized to access the property. I support individual rights and that man's right life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness was blatantly violated. Not everything is simply black and white.

If this had happened while the kid was running from the cops and disobeyed a lawful order, then he would have died from suicide by cops. Those two had no authority.

-6
Charnathan -6 points ago +4 / -10

He was a bit of a delinquent, but he didn't deserve to be murdered for suspected petty crime by a posse on nobody's request.

view more: Next ›