2
ChickNorris 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yes, how else would you explain organic mattresses being a thing?

2
ChickNorris 2 points ago +2 / -0

from that article: https://www.avocadogreenmattress.com/collections/mattresses

If people in LA are that stupid that they are buying organic mattresses then they deserve anything bad that happens to them.

That is one of the more stupid things labeled organic that I've ever seen.

1
ChickNorris 1 point ago +1 / -0

then you aren't in one of the highest orders.

14
ChickNorris 14 points ago +14 / -0

it's so much frustration and anger building up inside of them and they don't know what to do with it. If she wasn't in public she would probably have been pulling her own hair out or punching and kicking walls. Seriously. That's why the fists are clinched.

That girl has mental health issues and has not learned coping mechanisms at all. All she can do is ball up her fists and scream at the sky.

2
ChickNorris 2 points ago +2 / -0

not even a surprise. there are a number of non-Americans that oppose American election integrity and think they have a say in how we should govern ourselves.

Unfortunately our own traitorous government has let a lot of them in the front door and into the highest offices of the land.

2
ChickNorris 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'm disappointed to see Pinterest and REI on there. I mean, I will get rid of Pinterest but have to save recipes and stuff first. REI on the other hand... IDK, maybe they can be replaced with Bass Pro or Gander Mountain.

1
ChickNorris 1 point ago +1 / -0

I mean, he suffered a brain injury due to those clowns. I don't blame him for wanting to get away.

4
ChickNorris 4 points ago +4 / -0

Okie Dokie. You're not very pleasant for a Great Grandma.

4
ChickNorris 4 points ago +4 / -0

lol. that's CBD. CDB = Charlie Daniels Band. Devil Went Down to Georgia

5
ChickNorris 5 points ago +5 / -0

I've been thinking this for a while now tbh.

7
ChickNorris 7 points ago +7 / -0

page 20

It's a long ass opinion but from what I can glean, and I'm definitely not a lawyer, it's Justice Thomas' opinion and not a decision based on this last paragraph of his disposition:

The Second Circuit feared that then-President Trump cut off speech by using the features that Twitter made available to him. But if the aim is to ensure that speech is not smothered, then the more glaring concern must perforce be the dominant digital platforms themselves. As Twitter made clear, the right to cut off speech lies most powerfully in the hands of private digital platforms. The extent to which that power matters for purposes of the First Amendment and the extent to which that power could lawfully be modified raise interesting and important questions. This petition, unfortunately, affords us no opportunity to confront them.

15
ChickNorris 15 points ago +15 / -0

It's true. It's just Justice Thomas' opinion. It's not a decision or a change in law. No precedent has been set. He states at the end of his opinion that the matter is worth exploring but unfortunately does not fall under the purview of that particular case.

by 4547
1
ChickNorris 1 point ago +1 / -0

I had to look it up. Was so confused for a while.

2
ChickNorris 2 points ago +2 / -0

Huh. Vancouver actually looks like it's one of the few places I would want to visit in Canada. I'm just basing that off of scenery from a show that was filmed there but still... seems like it would be a cool city.

MapleBaconWaffles sounds amazing. There used to be a doughnut shop here that made doughnuts to order and one of their standard offers was a maple and candied bacon glazed doughnut. Delish. The shop closed and I'm glad because it was too good.

1
ChickNorris 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's a long ass opinion but from what I can glean, and I'm definitely not a lawyer, it's Justice Thomas' opinion and not a decision based on this last paragraph of his disposition:

The Second Circuit feared that then-President Trump cut off speech by using the features that Twitter made available to him. But if the aim is to ensure that speech is not smothered, then the more glaring concern must perforce be the dominant digital platforms themselves. As Twitter made clear, the right to cut off speech lies most powerfully in the hands of private digital platforms. The extent to which that power matters for purposes of the First Amendment and the extent to which that power could lawfully be modified raise interesting and important questions. This petition, unfortunately, affords us no opportunity to confront them.

21
ChickNorris 21 points ago +22 / -1

Is that why they are always in need of govt bailouts and flying costs so much? Cuz they're settling lawsuits left and right?

-11
ChickNorris -11 points ago +3 / -14

HERR? Undercover Nazi eh?

edit: people really need to lighten tf up. can't tell a joke on here anymore without people losing their minds.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›