We didn’t stop calling them trannys because you can’t just take over societal terms.
Ugh. Know and now are different.
This makes me question the underlying conclusion.....
Which resort?
Wife and I are going down for IVF in the new year.
No... standing is a good legal procedure.
You don’t want that rich fuck you cut off to take his road rage and sue you into oblivion on 1000 different subjects, this bankrupting you.
Standing is good. It should exist. It technically is correct here.
I’m sad that’s the case.
Not quite.
SCOTUS ruled that Texas has no standing due to it being a local state election.
Once you do the electors you’re now clearly violating their rights.
It’s a nice try, but this wouldn’t fly.
Yea I don’t believe this for a second.
I do agree liars shouldn’t be allowed to lie though.
We are dealing with some legal shit now. Other side lies constantly, wish their lawyer was forced to be honest.
This is an article from spring this year.
Not related to what’s currently going on.
The fire also happened BEFORE an election, not after.
Might be something, but it’s also quite a bit different.
Lol. So now you just make shit up as you go along.
You’re fuckin retarded. I bet you think fox called people on theDonald.win cyber criminals too!
I don’t understand how you can understand that point, yet still believe your original statement about Tucker. Perhaps you should watch the segment and see what he says....
Naw. That’s just not what happened.
He wanted to see some of the “other” proof she claims to have. You’re flat out lying here. I dunno why you feel the need to lie about this.
This. Thanks.
For anyone interested.
The Fox article does not call people on theDonald cyber criminals. It says the data is circulating on some other forum which is for full of criminals. I forget the name and I ain’t going to fix twice.
Dunno why this circulated so much here since it’s blatantly false, which is something the left has to do.
The right doesn’t need to lie.
Hardly shilling friend.
I think the reaction to Tucker’s segment is over the top.
I don’t think he was proven a liar.
He clearly wants more than affidavits, which Powell isn’t willing to do yet.
Tucker is saying that although she might not be willing, she also might not be able to.
It’s not an unreasonable ask.
You can support Trump, and also be unsure they can prove it in court.
No one went to jail for the spying (one lawyer doesn’t count). No one went to jail for the criminal leaks. No one went to jail over hunter Biden laptops.
I think people are really blowing this out of proportion. Tucker Carlson didn’t seem that unreasonable talking about it.
This whole you are either with us 110% unquestioning loyalty or you’re against us and a cuck is a bit extreme.
That’s what they sued for. You don’t settle for that number unless a bombshell was found in discovery.
I doubt it. Some lawyer did a write up about it explaining how he figured it wa 1 million total MAX. It made logical sense.
I’m in a legal battle right now.
The other side makes outrageous claims designed to slow down the legal process. I now have to spend money to fight this outrageous claims.
Whether claims are true or false, you need to fight in court to prove you’re right. What I’m saying is, regardless of all the fraud, you would expect Biden to fight.
I’m Canadian and I don’t think there is voter fraud.
Our issue is fake news and that Canada is too big without enough population. Regions are too difference.
Some one once said, “Canada is like a cow. It eats in the West, gets milked in the middle and shits in the east
Canadian here. Trudeau was elected without voter fraud.
Trudeau is corrupt as fuck. The issue is Canada does not have right wing media to balance the left.
Our top 5 media sources in Canada include 4 very left and one slightly left media sources.
The Conservative party through fraud voted for a new leader Andrew Scheer as leader to go up be Trudeau, and he was a bad leader, that was the big problem.
Before that Harper won 4 elections. He did well, but too many Canadians wanted a change because the media kept saying he’s bad.
I was looking at this last night. In fact this was edited in on October 22, shortly before the election. There was a back and forth battle adding-removing-adding-removing-adding and on and on. Like 30 or so swaps from Nov 5-7
Yea. Seems like it’s bullshit.
CANT help but notice a drastic drop in numbers with no change that would have impacted deaths that fast.
Almost as if reporting is being done differently?