Thats a very common make and style of rv. If they've id'd this guy it has to be based on more than similarities in rv's.
Lin Wood is a loose cannon.
Choreography worthy of a college halftime show.
An interesting read. Especially the comments. Recommended
Its a 1 nm radius around those coordinates and up to 3000 agl, so not terribly restrictive as you can still overfly above 3000 agl. If anyone's interested where that is just drop those coordinates into Google earth. Pretty sure it's the blast site though.
Well let's roll Rudy . This better be the real deal.
Not true. It's been debunked repeatedly here. This is about the 50th post here to get it wrong. The 22nd date is a placeholder until the court assigns an actual date.
Not a bombshell. Just a theory on how to get the court to hear the Texas case by filing it as a case from the US govt. It's getting very late in the day though and the court seems bent on not doing anything . Just more hopium.
Yeah, and the pope quit yesterday too. /s
Lettuce rejoice this Christmas season and lettuce not into damnation.
Welcome to God's country. Just a heads up. If anyone says to you bless your heart or says of you bless his heart. It ain't a compliment.
There's an excellent chance they schedule it so that it's irrelevant, after the inauguration. Until they cuck out though I'm giving them the benefit of the doubt.
John Eastman, the president’s attorney in this case, told The Epoch Times in an email that the Jan. 22 date is an automatic entry by the clerk’s office, as every petition for certiorari is given a 30-day response deadline after the request is docketed.
“So don’t read anything into that,” Eastman said. “The Court is fully aware of our Motion for Expedited Consideration, and if it grants our motion, new dates will be provided via court order.”
No content. Fake news.
This is incorrect. The Jan 22 date is a placeholder until the court assigns a date.
Oxycovid. What a way to go.
Good. Now sue them.
Good thing it wasn't a BAR. Those will totally fuck you up.
The article says it's a formality. All new cases receive a temporary date 30 days from filing. An actual date will be assigned soon.
Meaning you would. lol. Prove me wrong
This is from the article so it looks like the 22nd date is just a formality until a real date is assigned. I'll withhold judgement.
*John Eastman, the president’s attorney in this case, told The Epoch Times in an email that the Jan. 22 date is an automatic entry by the clerk’s office, as every petition for certiorari is given a 30-day response deadline after the request is docketed.
“So don’t read anything into that,” Eastman said. “The Court is fully aware of our Motion for Expedited Consideration, and if it grants our motion, new dates will be provided via court order.”*
Time travel?