If you wonder ‘why bother?’ think about how much general public awareness of the election fraud built on solid proof delegitimizes the Residents-select in ways that affect things like enforcement of gun confiscation and other destructive policies.
We need a supermajority of normies to be generally aware of the fraud and unwilling to actively support unAmerican activities, even if they are otherwise useless.
Gen Z was raised under “zero tolerance” policies that taught them that the only way to survive is to shamelessly game the system. They can see that LGBQTXYZ identity offers a plethora benefits, requires no effort, and incurs no penalty — and they feel no shame in hypocrisy among a culture steeped in liars.
That’s why girls in sports are gonna be losing their college scholarships to ‘trans’ male athletes who will be more than happy to get a free ride on easy mode.
Hell, as long as as they spout the correct identity they can even sleep around with their shower partners and have legal and ‘cultural’ protection from rape accusations, too!
“Resurgence in hospitalisations and deaths is dominated by those that have received two doses of the vaccine.”
A PRAGMATIC KNIFE-FIGHT: “President Trump endorsing a club member should not be a surprise to those who have advocated for Trump to take-over the republican party. Rubio has enough support within the club that a non-endorsement, or Trump’s support for a primary challenge, would exhaust a lot of political capital and ultimately result in a fight within the club.
Trump remaining inside the club, influencing the club, and carrying a sword of Damocles (endorsement or lack thereof) inside the club, could and should be viewed as the most pragmatic approach toward changing the club. Indeed, President Trump has previously said he preferred to remain in the Republican party as opposed to starting a new party from the ground up.
Currently we have a rather unique political dynamic. Arguably, the club now needs Trump more than Trump needs the club. However, also arguably, the club infrastructure is factually a value to President Trump...
If members inside the club are permitted to undermine the MAGA agenda of Donald Trump -the historic reference- then what value does the club actually have? ...if local and state club officials are tepid in their support, or worse yet actively work to undermine their candidate, then what value is the club? This has been my argument for over 15 years. Alas, if I am to support the MAGA objective I must defer my opinion to the person who really is the decision-maker, Donald Trump.
Again, Trump remaining inside the club, influencing the club, and carrying a sword of Damocles (endorsement or lack thereof) inside the club could be viewed as the successful approach toward changing the club. The historic reference here would be Barack Obama taking over the DNC club, against the Clinton machine...
Barack Obama now owns the DNC club and has full control. Donald Trump is still working through the process and does not have full control; hence he has to navigate through the tribal issues that remain inside the RNC club.
President Trump endorsing Marco Rubio is pragmatic and keeps options A and B open. If Trump had not endorsed Rubio, or endorsed a challenger, then Option B (takeover of the club) would be much harder as the club would fight to save Rubio...
I have personally been an advocate for starting a new political party. I know how challenging that approach is, and I am wide-eyed to the reality of it. That said, I have also wanted the Republican party to reform so that a new party was not needed. However, years of suffering through broken promises of club reform leave me strongly cynical, but I am willing to give President Trump every opportunity to succeed because, well, if I am being honest, we have not had a person on the inside genuinely trying to reform the party.”
Most up to date PDF Compilation of vaccine articles. March 13 2021
https://files.catbox.moe/pttdko.pdf
https://pastelink.net/vaccine-deaths
Social media posts (less scientific, more convincing to normies)
“Project Gutenberg is a library of over 60,000 free eBooks. Choose among free epub and Kindle eBooks, download them or read them online.”
“The NFA made it nearly impossible for the common law-abiding citizen to attain an automatic weapon only because the cost was prohibitive for most common Americans due to the heavy tax laid upon the purchase of one. It was egregious for the federal government to craft such a law, but perhaps the more important distinction is that there was no federal law suggesting that an American citizen couldn’t legally own a properly registered and purchased “machine gun” for more than 50 years after the NFA was passed, because it was clearly understood that a federal “ban” on such weapons was an infringement upon law-abiding citizens’ Second Amendment right.
In truth, automatic weapons were not actually “banned” in this country until 1986. It wasn’t until the farcical passage of the Hughes Amendment as an addendum to the National Firearm Owners’ Protection Act (FOPA) of 1986 that ownership of any such firearm was truly “banned” by the federal government.
If you ever imagined that our elected betters are actively working toward the preservation of our constitutionally protected rights, watch this video of Charlie Rangel leading the House in a “voice vote” to allow the Hughes Amendment, and allowing only two minutes of raucous “deliberation.” It is among the lowest and most ridiculous moments in the history of our American Congress -- and that’s saying something.
It has been reported that President Reagan considered vetoing the FOPA due to the inclusion of the Hughes Amendment, but was convinced by the NRA to not do so, believing that the “Supreme Court would throw that measure out as unconstitutional,” thereby “correcting the defect in new law.” That challenge to the unlawful “machine gun ban” never came. And now, thirty-three years later, nothing could be more natural than Americans assuming that the federal government somehow has the right to ban whatever weapons it can successfully ban, even if it does so via legislative subterfuge.
If the “slippery slope” idiom ever has a meaningful application, this might be a good example of it.
In the end, it took 146 years of American history for the government to even make a sweeping effort toward a federal gun law restricting firearms among the law-abiding populace. It took sly maneuvering to enact the first federal gun control, achieved only under the auspices of the government’s “right to tax” firearms, and an ensuing fifty years of the government purposely avoiding the notion of that government could “ban” any firearm (for fear of running afoul of the Second Amendment), before a Congressional circus in 1986 finally presumed that the government could actually “ban” automatic weapons.”
Desperately needs a better name
Look in history for military and organizational scout unit (cough), auxiliary unit, forward-deployed unit, or heroic unit designations or monikers. Vet the coolest-sounding ones for negative meanings and/or historical incidents. Choose the one that has the most peacetime application. Done.
JOEBAMANOMICS: “The policies that intentionally held down the U.S. economy during the Obama administration are once again being duplicated...
JoeBama’s energy policy is crushing jobs in key regions where energy jobs are being lost in dramatic fashion. Simultaneously the costs of energy, including gas, are skyrocketing.
The longer-term costs have not yet hit the consumer, but they will soon as inflation will jump dramatically while employment will continue to struggle because consumer demand will drop… The issues create a cascading cycle.
The Biden administration is hiding their actual policy impact by blaming COVID, but that’s not the issue that will hurt blue-collar workers in the longest term...
the stock market (multinationals) will gain, but the U.S. worker economy will suffer lost jobs and lower wages. This dichotomy is by design and the corporate media economists never discuss it.
This reality is a big part of the reason why Pelosi and JoeBama needed to quickly pump money into the working class in order to avoid the pitchforks. However, that $2,000 injection will not last and will be eaten up quickly by the larger and longer term Biden economic policy.
The U.S. economy, which is 70% dependent on consumer spending, is going to contract. This contraction will be “unexpected” by the professional pundit class...
If you are a blue-collar or white-collar worker in a BLUE region or state, you will feel the impact first. It is going to get very ugly, as noted by the disparity in the unemployment claims this week.”
NOTE THE USE OF “PROFESSIONAL STANDARDS” AS THE ATTACK VECTOR
“Bhattacharya expressed a scientific skepticism that a microaggression could be distinguished from an unintentionally rude statement. His doubts were wellfounded given that microaggression theory is not a particularly rigorous concept.
But Sara Rasmussen, an assistant professor who helped to organize the event, thought Bhattacharya's questions were a bit too pointed. Immediately following the panel, she filed a "professionalism concern card"—a kind of record of a student's violations of university policy.
"This student asked a series of questions that were quite antagonistic toward the panel," wrote Rasmussen. "He pressed on and stated one faculty member was being contradictory. His level of frustration/anger seemed to escalate until another faculty member defused the situation by calling on another student for questions. I am shocked that a med student would show so little respect toward faculty members. It worries me how he will do on wards."
...The student was informed that he must be evaluated by psychological services before returning to classes. Bhattacharya repeatedly asked university officials to clarify what exactly he was accused of, under whose authority his counseling had been mandated, and why his enrollment status was suddenly in doubt, according to the lawsuit. These queries only appear to have made UVA officials more determined to punish him: Bhattacharya's mounting frustration with these baseless accusations of unspecified wrongdoings was essentially treated as evidence that he was guilty. At his hearing, he was accused of being "extremely defensive" and ordered to change his "aggressive, threatening behavior."
He was ultimately suspended for "aggressive and inappropriate interactions in multiple situations." On December 30, UVA police ordered him to leave campus.
UVA's administration engaged in behavior that can be described as "gaslighting." Administrators asserted that Bhattacharya had behaved aggressively when he hadn't, and then cited his increasing confusion, frustration, and hostility toward the disciplinary process as evidence that he was aggressive.”
https://reason.com/2021/04/07/microaggressions-uva-student-kieran-bhattacharya-threat/
Think of it more like Game of Thrones and less like Mr. Smith Goes to Washington.
Trump is playing to win — a lot more than a single election.
You can think of his whole first term as doing what was necessary to wake us up to the amount of corruption and provide the proof for all our future battles that losing our culture, economy, and national sovereignty isn’t some forgone conclusion — winning only takes putting America First.
Now he’s charted us a realistic path forward to successfully take our country back, instead of just crying about losing it. His plan is composed of things YOU can do TODAY, not imaginary set-piece battles, and it leverages our economic POWER and unity of purpose instead of simply expending our capacity for violence, much the same way he leveraged our nation’s to win wars with diplomacy instead of nukes.