6
CloakAndDagger 6 points ago +6 / -0

Why do you people ALWAYS assume malice when someone corrects a typo or incorrect grammar? I do it to help, not to ridicule.

The correct answer is "thx man" to which I would reply "no probs"

2
CloakAndDagger 2 points ago +2 / -0

Chinkenpox camps - Soon coming to a country near YOU!

1
CloakAndDagger 1 point ago +1 / -0

OH LOOK, IT'S THE KEVIN SPACEY DEFENSE AGAIN. "I molested guys but it's okay if I 'come out' as gay"

Nah, he ain't gay. He's a pedophile. inb4 it's the same picture.png

Brandon Straka is not a pedo, nor is Scott Presler

Lincoln Project should crash and burn, metaphorically

4
CloakAndDagger 4 points ago +4 / -0

Flynn doesn't hold position anymore but yep, based

11
CloakAndDagger 11 points ago +11 / -0

Trump's cabinet is made of Pompeo, Ben Carson and Ric Grenell. The rest are backstabbers

1
CloakAndDagger 1 point ago +1 / -0

In an ideal world:

  1. person uses faulty grammar
  2. another person points out the mistake and elaborates how it should be said instead
  3. first person says "thanks" and they both move on
  4. first person can now use correct grammar in all his future posts and comments

Tell me, who is hurt or damaged by this scenario? Who is being divided or driven away by this? Nobody.

Insisting on anything different is just like saying "fat is beautiful, don't bodyshame people!". This culture of making excuses for mistakes is incredibly destructive - no, the person making a mistake is not at fault and nobody is hating on him. The goal is mutual advancement by helping people not make mistakes. Tell me... If some lady wore high heels on ice and slipped, would it constitute "being a dick" if I told her to wear non-slippery boots instead? No. My goal would be to avoid any further slipping. Don't project malice where there is none.

If OP had merely said "thanks bro" instead of acting offended and insecure and you coming in to whiteknight then none of this would have happened. I would have replied with "no probs". I advise you to do that in the future.

by Raken
1
CloakAndDagger 1 point ago +1 / -0

The new congress will just pass a bill in 10 minutes that outlaws everything Gab-related. Call me a doomer, you know it's coming.

1
CloakAndDagger 1 point ago +1 / -0

The two are not mutually exclusive. It is possible to oppose the deep state while using proper English. As I said...

The correct response is "thanks for the correction" instead of being offended at an attempt at helping."

If someone fell on the street and I went there to help him up, you people would accuse me of being belligerent towards that person instead of seeing what really happened - an attempt at helping someone. Stop being so insecure, say thanks and we can all move on.

by Graylik
2
CloakAndDagger 2 points ago +2 / -0

I don't think so, that would make it too obvious for normies. They would ideally prefer a Dem president with a slight dem majority in both houses. Total control but just enough plausible deniability! And despite the occasional grandstanding and theater, all RINOs would be on board with key issues like gun grabbing. That is their dream.

1
CloakAndDagger 1 point ago +1 / -0
  1. Being a nationalist means you not only love your homeland but also respect your language!

  2. You can't claim intellectual superiority over the left if you're a dumbfuck who doesn't even speak proper English. Don't be sloppy!

  3. It's the internet, which means vernacular can include things like "u", "lol", "ain't", etc. But saying "if you would have" is a straight up mistake.

The correct response is "thanks for the correction" instead of being offended at an attempt at helping.

by Graylik
4
CloakAndDagger 4 points ago +5 / -1

They will NOT get voted out of office. Have you learned nothing? Dominion, hammer, scorecard.

3
CloakAndDagger 3 points ago +5 / -2

*If you had told me

Third conditional: "if + past perfect tense" followed by "would have + present simple tense".

I'm not a native speaker, yet I know this stuff, come on!

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›