-5
CloakAndDagger -5 points ago +2 / -7

That post is highly erroneous.

The ratio of HETEROSEXUAL to HOMOSEXUAL pedophiles is 11:1 (it says so in the linked study. Apparently the original comment's author didn't read the site well enough). That means for every 11 straight pedophile, there is 1 gay pedophile. That's how math checks out because for 99 straight pedophiles there are 9 gay pedophiles, and that's about 5 times larger than if it were just 2 gay pedophiles (because gays are 2% of the population).

If there were 11 gay pedos to 1 straight pedo, then gays would be 550 times more likely to molest kids!

There are only 5 times "more" gay pedophiles compared to their ratio in the population; so there are still 11 times as many straight pedophiles as gay pedophiles at face value.

-2
CloakAndDagger -2 points ago +3 / -5

That post is also highly erroneous.

The ratio of HETEROSEXUAL to HOMOSEXUAL pedophiles is 11:1 (it says so in the linked study. Apparently the original comment's author didn't read the site well enough). That means for every 11 straight pedophile, there is 1 gay pedophile. That's how math checks out because for 99 straight pedophiles there are 9 gay pedophiles, and that's about 5 times larger than if it were just 2 gay pedophiles (because gays are 2% of the population).

If there were 11 gay pedos to 1 straight pedo, then gays would be 550 times more likely to molest kids!

There are only 5 times "more" gay pedophiles compared to their ratio in the population; so there are still 11 times as many straight pedophiles as gay pedophiles at face value.

6
CloakAndDagger 6 points ago +11 / -5

The original comment is also highly erroneous.

The ratio of HETEROSEXUAL to HOMOSEXUAL pedophiles is 11:1 (it says so in the linked study. Apparently the original comment's author didn't read the site well enough). That means for every 11 straight pedophile, there is 1 gay pedophile. That's how math checks out because for 99 straight pedophiles there are 9 gay pedophiles, and that's about 5 times larger than if it were just 2 gay pedophiles (because gays are 2% of the population).

If there were 11 gay pedos to 1 straight pedo, then gays would be 550 times more likely to molest kids!

There are only 5 times "more" gay pedophiles compared to their ratio in the population; so there are still 11 times as many straight pedophiles as gay pedophiles at face value.

Also, trans =/= gay. For example Scott Presler is not trans.

0
CloakAndDagger 0 points ago +1 / -1

The original comment is also highly erroneous.

The ratio of HETEROSEXUAL to HOMOSEXUAL pedophiles is 11:1 (it says so in the linked study. Apparently the original comment's author didn't read the site well enough). That means for every 11 straight pedophile, there is 1 gay pedophile. That's how math checks out because for 99 straight pedophiles there are 9 gay pedophiles, and that's about 5 times larger than if it were just 2 gay pedophiles (because gays are 2% of the population).

If there were 11 gay pedos to 1 straight pedo, then gays would be 550 times more likely to molest kids!

There are only 5 times "more" gay pedophiles compared to their ratio in the population; so there are still 11 times as many straight pedophiles as gay pedophiles at face value.

Also, trans =/= gay. For example Scott Presler is not trans.

5
CloakAndDagger 5 points ago +6 / -1

Thanks for the sane comment, and also the original comment is highly erroneous.

The ratio of HETEROSEXUAL to HOMOSEXUAL pedophiles is 11:1 (it says so in the linked study. Apparently the original comment's author didn't read the site well enough). That means for every 11 straight pedophile, there is 1 gay pedophile. That's how math checks out because for 99 straight pedophiles there are 9 gay pedophiles, and that's about 5 times larger than if it were just 2 gay pedophiles (because gays are 2% of the population).

If there were 11 gay pedos to 1 straight pedo, then gays would be 550 times more likely to molest kids!

There are only 5 times "more" gay pedophiles compared to their ratio in the population; so there are still 11 times as many straight pedophiles as gay pedophiles at face value.

Talking simplistic theoretical example here, say you have two tribes, in one there is a recessive gene for excessive altruism and in the other there is not. Even if it is at the cost of the individuals who have it, if their altruism is what enables their tribe members to survive a famine while the other tribe starves, it is the gene pool of the tribe containing this gene that survives, not the one of the tribe without.

I can name a very good example for this: Meerkats have guards that whistle when a predator approaches to warn the rest of the tribe. The guard will probably get eaten first but more animals will be saved by his alarm, therefore the whistling will get passed down.

-1
CloakAndDagger -1 points ago +2 / -3

That post is also highly erroneous.

The ratio of HETEROSEXUAL to HOMOSEXUAL pedophiles is 11:1 (it says so in the linked study. Apparently the original comment's author didn't read the site well enough). That means for every 11 straight pedophile, there is 1 gay pedophile. That's how math checks out because for 99 straight pedophiles there are 9 gay pedophiles, and that's about 5 times larger than if it were just 2 gay pedophiles (because gays are 2% of the population).

If there were 11 gay pedos to 1 straight pedo, then gays would be 550 times more likely to molest kids!

There are only 5 times "more" gay pedophiles compared to their ratio in the population; so there are still 11 times as many straight pedophiles as gay pedophiles at face value.

Also, trans =/= gay. For example Scott Presler is not trans.

1
CloakAndDagger 1 point ago +2 / -1

OBJECTION:

The ratio of HETEROSEXUAL to HOMOSEXUAL pedophiles is 11:1 (check your source, it says so). That means for every 11 straight pedophile, there is 1 gay pedophile. That's how math checks out because for 99 straight pedophiles there are 9 gay pedophiles, and that's about 5 times larger than if it were just 2 gay pedophiles (because gays are 2% of the population).

If there were 11 gay pedos to 1 straight pedo, then gays would be 550 times more likely to molest kids!

There are only 5 times "more" gay pedophiles compared to their ratio in the population; so there are still 11 times as many straight pedophiles as gay pedophiles at face value.

Please correct your comment. Patriots.win loves to hold the legacy media's feet to the fire over fake news but some users here also misrepresent statistics to further their own agenda.

Also, this piece of shit reddit admin was a tranny. Trans is not the same as gay, cause Scott Presler isn't trans.

1
CloakAndDagger 1 point ago +1 / -0

My mistake. I was thinking of Trey Gowdy in my head because their faces and names are somewhat similar. And Trey is an opportunistic traitor. Then again, Trey is no longer a House member so there must be another guy I mixed him up with.

However... Josh Hawley did vote yes on a Biden cabinet pick: on Cecilia Rouse, for chair of Council or Economic Advisers.

-2
CloakAndDagger -2 points ago +1 / -3

He didn't object the certification. Opportunistic traitor

10
CloakAndDagger 10 points ago +11 / -1

Because Trump is, as much as I love him, is getting fkin out of touch with his own base.

Also, his army of vipers aka "advisors" keep brainwashing him, he needs to connect to the people directly like he used to. I mean this site was miles ahead of him on every info and our pleas kept being ignored on every topic.

5
CloakAndDagger 5 points ago +6 / -1

Agreed, let them have their fun somewhere else and leave us alone, or better yet, send them to live with the Qultists over at GA.win. Freaks vs clowns

12
CloakAndDagger 12 points ago +18 / -6

MODS ARE COMPROMISED GLOWIES IF THEY STICKY THIS.

Keep Stromfront off my Patrions.win!

30
CloakAndDagger 30 points ago +30 / -0

But he'll vote democrat in every election from now on.

27
CloakAndDagger 27 points ago +28 / -1

The right answer would have been Ben Carson, Richard Grenell, Stephen Miller, Ron DeSantis, Sheriff David Clarke, and Scott Presler.

3
CloakAndDagger 3 points ago +5 / -2

You are an enlightened man among the half-blind.

1
CloakAndDagger 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's okay to be a philanthropic Christian, but what will you do when the Great reset footsoldiers come for you and your family? Give them blessings and turn the other cheek while they lock you down permanently and force you to be vaccinated with toxins every week?

1
CloakAndDagger 1 point ago +1 / -0

Aka trust the plan, be a cuck and bend over

1
CloakAndDagger 1 point ago +1 / -0

If you have the time then maybe you could edit your original comment to correct the numbers. Some foreigners will think that the poor doc is fined for 325.000 USD instead of 3.238.

1
CloakAndDagger 1 point ago +1 / -0

There is 1 zero difference between 1 million and 1 hundred thousands HUF.

6
CloakAndDagger 6 points ago +7 / -1

Orbán has introduced lockdowns that would put Whitmer to shame and plans to give the jab to everyone in the country. He is a Great Reset puppet 100% wrapped in a nationalist ribbon. It doesn't matter if he's based on immigration if he ruins millions of lives with this chemical genocide. He is a danger to the nation

6
CloakAndDagger 6 points ago +6 / -0

You're off by a zero. It was one million HUF, not a hundred thousand.

And that equals to 3.238 USD, not 325.000 (that would be a hundred million Forints).

Orbán has sold us out for the Great Reset. Mi Hazánk is the one we must vote for, its leader Toroczkai is talking about the entire picture on his youtube channel.

1
CloakAndDagger 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'd never take one if they paid me, but in case you are forced and have a choice, do Sinofarm. Yes, it's ccp-made, but it is the only vaccine that is made the traditional method, aka a full deactivated virus. All the others are mRna gene therapy, or adenoviral vector bullshit which is virtually the same in that it makes your body produce viral proteins. It would be harder to do population-control with a jab that has basically a weaker wuhan flu in it, especially since we know it's not the black plague 2.0.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›