6
ClokworkGremlin 6 points ago +6 / -0

Not "nothing." They destroyed the economy on purpose. Because you can't instantiate a socialist revolution on a population that's happy and productive.

0
ClokworkGremlin 0 points ago +0 / -0

Speed, mostly. Also, pen and paper still has the question of trust. That's why we have poll watchers, is because you can't trust the tallyers. We've got them changing votes on video this election.

1
ClokworkGremlin 1 point ago +1 / -0

Cronkite was a commie the whole time. The media has always been left, the difference is that before the internet, fewer people were able to freely compare notes. Now fraud is out in daylight, running rampant, and people think it's new.

It's not new. You just couldn't see it before.

0
ClokworkGremlin 0 points ago +0 / -0

Cronkite was a socialist.

2
ClokworkGremlin 2 points ago +2 / -0

I actually have yet to see any evidence of "ruthless." Christine Ford never went to prison.

2
ClokworkGremlin 2 points ago +2 / -0

It won't. The indoctrinated can't be fixed.

2
ClokworkGremlin 2 points ago +2 / -0

The soviets were not stopped.

0
ClokworkGremlin 0 points ago +0 / -0

My comment back when Floyd was killed was "I don't know a way out of this mess that doesn't involve genocide."

Not an ethnic cleansing. An ideological cleansing. The left are a cult, and they've built up an immunity to the truth by years of constant training and indoctrination. They'll never turn on their masters.

0
ClokworkGremlin 0 points ago +0 / -0

Vee is a Romanian (IIRC) right-wing pundit who's friends with Sargon of Akkad. They, Scrump Monkey, and Arch Warhammer had a long-running Cyberpunk campaign a few years ago.

2
ClokworkGremlin 2 points ago +2 / -0

I don't think this is how "Ranked choice" voting works.

Ranked choice is actually a bit of an improvement on first-past-the-pole (which we currently use) BUT if we're going to be using it, we need to do so publicly and transparently, and everyone needs to agree on it, not just some backroom software engineers.

0
ClokworkGremlin 0 points ago +0 / -0

This is an interesting case where I don't think you understand how a blockchain works, but you're still fairly correct.

4
ClokworkGremlin 4 points ago +4 / -0

The guy whose only two actions during his time as governor were drinking beer and slaughtering the economy?

Yeah, nobody was surprised to see hum drop out of the presidential race. Dude's a tiny fish.

3
ClokworkGremlin 3 points ago +3 / -0

I actually can velieve Biden won in Colorado because a lot of the other issues on our ballots ended up going left as well. Particularly the abortion ban lost hard.

Some of the other races (Hickenlooper vs Gardener) might be cheated, but there are some i dont think they would have much reason to... unless they're just rigging everything now.

0
ClokworkGremlin 0 points ago +1 / -1

You can only be certain of code running on a system that you executed that code on personally. If every citizen in the country is running code that independently verifies each vote, they can be sure of the votes they verify.

That opens us up to another problem, though. If a ton of machines in the network are running fraudulent code, they become the standard, and the honest code gets rejected.

0
ClokworkGremlin 0 points ago +0 / -0

Take the machines out of the equation, but that probably means running the code locally on each user's computer.

This is part of why Bitcoin is secure. Evert full node on the network independently verifies every transaction. If one node broadcasts a transaction (vote) that doesn't pass scrutiny, that node gets blacklisted by the network.

0
ClokworkGremlin 0 points ago +0 / -0

It needs to be independently verifiable. The signature on the transaction needs to depend on how you voted, and use a unique private key known only to the voter. That way you can check your own vote later and verify that it was tabulated as you intended.

0
ClokworkGremlin 0 points ago +0 / -0

Python, java, and HTML aren't hard, but i don't know if I'd be able to spot anything anomalous. Which repo would you prioritize?

0
ClokworkGremlin 0 points ago +0 / -0

My thought process is mostly that if they think they'll be shunned on suspicion of pedophilia, they'll hide and group up with others, even if they hate it. Which is where we get things like massive pedo rings. If we try to get them help, they're less likely to cover for the ones who don't feel even remotely bad.

11
ClokworkGremlin 11 points ago +13 / -2

I wouldn't quite say "all of them."

That's going to get me downvotes, so hold on a second and hear me out: some people suffer from sexual attraction to children, know it's wrong, and want to get the psychiatric help they need. Those people should be treated.

The rest, though, should be castrated and hung upside down until dead.

9
ClokworkGremlin 9 points ago +9 / -0

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4wwXphbJNBo

I assure you, Justice Roberts. God is forgiving.

Just be sure to ask him when you get there.

3
ClokworkGremlin 3 points ago +3 / -0

Make every losing race close and every winning race a landslide. That should raise some eyebrows over the state of American politics.

It's been "close" for how long?

3
ClokworkGremlin 3 points ago +3 / -0

They've been working on this for generations. Since the 1960s at least, and very likely since the cold war.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›