2
Conservativechick 2 points ago +2 / -0

When I was young, I had a set of dolls from a bunch of different nations with their different traditional clothing / attributes. I don't understand why this is offensive. I loved the idea that there were so many different types of people and cultures in the world. Isn't that why people travel? To see they way people live in different places? It's why people go to a luau in Hawaii or to see the temples in Asia, or the Mayan ruins in Mexico.

1
Conservativechick 1 point ago +1 / -0

The entire sex crazed, perverted, gutter culture of our entire nation was created by communists (and thus satan) to subdue the greatest country on earth.

No one wanted this. No one asked for this. No one was eager to have their children taught perversion in kindergarten or confused about their gender.

No one wanted to see filth paraded as art.

If one actually reads the "new" commies from the 60's - this is all part of the plan. It's cultural Marxism.

2
Conservativechick 2 points ago +2 / -0

And you and the other cowardly Republicans allowed it.

1
Conservativechick 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'm learning French on Duolingo - one of the lessons literally just included the phrases "that city is dangerous" "this place is dangerous" "that street is dangerous."

Sad.

5
Conservativechick 5 points ago +5 / -0

"His chauffeur, a man by the name of Robert Parker, recalled that LBJ once asked him if he would prefer his real name as opposed to “boy,” “ni*****,” or “chief.” Parker responded that he would prefer to be called by his given name. LBJ responded, “As long as you are black, and you’re gonna be black till the day you die, no one’s gonna call you by your goddamn name. So no matter what you are called, ni****, you just let it roll off your back like water, and you’ll make it. Just pretend you’re a goddamn piece of furniture.”"

5
Conservativechick 5 points ago +6 / -1

You did that Matt.

Every person who supports the Democrat Party supports this evil.

1
Conservativechick 1 point ago +1 / -0

I understand what you're saying, and there is some truth to it, but on the other hand, Hasidics are some of Trump's most ardent supporters. Assigning guilt or innocence by race does no one any good. It is, in fact, a means of dividing people and furthering demoralization. Each person is responsible for their own actions, period. That's what I believe.

1
Conservativechick 1 point ago +1 / -0

You could say the same thing about white men - neither observation tells you much about who is to blame. You have to look at the individual perpetrators - not at the group.

3
Conservativechick 3 points ago +3 / -0

"Sometimes the law defends plunder and participates in it. Thus the beneficiaries are spared the shame, danger, and scruple which their acts would otherwise involve. Sometimes the law places the whole apparatus of judges, police, prisons, and gendarmes at the service of the plunderers, and treats the victim — when he defends himself — as a criminal. In short, there is a legal plunder...

...how is this legal plunder to be identified? Quite simply. See if the law takes from some persons what belongs to them, and gives it to other persons to whom it does not belong. See if the law benefits one citizen at the expense of another by doing what the citizen himself cannot do without committing a crime.

Then abolish this law without delay, for it is not only an evil itself, but also it is a fertile source for further evils because it invites reprisals. If such a law — which may be an isolated case — is not abolished immediately, it will spread, multiply, and develop into a system."

The Law (cont)

1
Conservativechick 1 point ago +2 / -1

No single race corners the market on stupidity or greed. There is good and bad across the spectrum. Trying to blame any race (whites, for example) is seriously misguided. Each individual is responsible for their own character.

5
Conservativechick 5 points ago +5 / -0

"Man can live and satisfy his wants only by ceaseless labor; by the ceaseless application of his faculties to natural resources. This process is the origin of property.

But it is also true that a man may live and satisfy his wants by seizing and consuming the products of the labor of others. This process is the origin of plunder.

Now since man is naturally inclined to avoid pain — and since labor is pain in itself — it follows that men will resort to plunder whenever plunder is easier than work. History shows this quite clearly. And under these conditions, neither religion nor morality can stop it.

When, then, does plunder stop? It stops when it becomes more painful and more dangerous than labor.

It is evident, then, that the proper purpose of law is to use the power of its collective force to stop this fatal tendency to plunder instead of to work. All the measures of the law should protect property and punish plunder."

Bastiat - The Law

7
Conservativechick 7 points ago +7 / -0

Not enough people will get this. It explains a lot. Marx was just a flat out evil psychopathic loser. It is incredible that his warped ideology is still destroying nations today.

2
Conservativechick 2 points ago +2 / -0

Never underestimate the power of promises of free stuff on the minds of useful idiots.

5
Conservativechick 5 points ago +5 / -0

Socialism/Communism is literally Satan's system or design for the world.

This is from Whitaker Chambers who was a member of the communist underground in the 50's, after he became a Christian:

“It [Communism] is not new. It is, in fact, man's second oldest faith. Its promise was whispered in the first days of the Creation under the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil: "Ye shall be as gods." It is the great alternative faith of mankind. Like all great faiths, its force derives from a simple vision. Other ages have had great visions. They have always been different versions of the same vision: the vision of God and man's relationship to God. The Communist vision is the vision of Man without God."

Socialism puts government in the place of God.

Also read 1 Samuel 8 about Israel wanting a king. "6 But when they said, “Give us a king to lead us,” this displeased Samuel; so he prayed to the Lord. 7 And the Lord told him: “Listen to all that the people are saying to you; it is not you they have rejected, but they have rejected me as their king. 8 As they have done from the day I brought them up out of Egypt until this day, forsaking me and serving other gods, so they are doing to you. 9"

2
Conservativechick 2 points ago +2 / -0

Did you make that? - It's amazing.

1
Conservativechick 1 point ago +1 / -0

Absolute truth.

3
Conservativechick 3 points ago +3 / -0

I think I'm actually going to cry just seeing him and remembering what is what like having a real president.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›