1
CookMySock 1 point ago +1 / -0

The existence of authority is absolutely at fault. If you believe authority is a problem now because it has been corrupted by leftism, you obviously don't understand that all authority is inherently evil JUST like the founders stated. Widespread corruption in America isn't a new thing, this type of shit has existed for centuries. Hence the founder's intent to create a very limited government.

Trusting government is one of the most retarded things anyone can do.

1
CookMySock 1 point ago +1 / -0

The level of force used has to obviously be warranted, and lethal force shouldn't be used unless absolutely necessary. So, back to the original point of whether or not the kid in Minnesota deserved to get shot, then that would obviously be no. The dude was already pretty restrained and even the police officer believed a gun wasn't necessary as she already admitted she intended to reach for her taser. She fucked up and should be held fully accountable.

5
CookMySock 5 points ago +5 / -0

At least the enemy is focused solely on them. Helps GOA and other real organizations to continue doing the Lord's work. NRA is #1 punching bag.

1
CookMySock 1 point ago +1 / -0

Isn't the whole point of employment to enrich one's self? I'm certainly not a fucking communist, and I won't lift a finger for free. Besides, most people who join the military do so for free college and/or an easy security clearance. Narrowing it down to just your two possibilities just reeks of someone who never served and doesn't know what the fuck they are talking about.

Also, every aspect of America is a fucking corporate sham. How far up your own ass do you have to be to think you aren't a slave to the system?

0
CookMySock 0 points ago +1 / -1

That would be most ideal. The hero worship here is pretty disappointing. Scorched earth should have been exactly what he did, as I don't believe there is any federal system left uncorrupted. He should have gutted everything he possibly could, then set about fixing it. Maybe that's too much for even two terms.

2
CookMySock 2 points ago +2 / -0

You know, with all this talk about gun control and this ATF nominee you would think way more people here would be all about getting rid of law enforcement. Certainly makes their ability to grab guns way more difficult.

1
CookMySock 1 point ago +2 / -1

I don't think the police have done a single thing to keep me safe and alive. They certainly don't stand guard outside my door or even really patrol my neighborhood, so how the fuck am I kept safe by their presence?

1
CookMySock 1 point ago +1 / -0

"We are the party of law and order" fuck that shit. This country was founded by those who pissed on the laws and rules passed down by their oppressors. I'll follow their example before I follow the example of someone who peacefully abdicated to an usurper.

1
CookMySock 1 point ago +1 / -0

I haven't been to a gun show in a few years, but even when I bought my first AK it was at a gun show and I walked out with it same day. I'm not sure how its done where you are at, but for where I was at if the gun show is big enough they had ATF reps there that processed the background check right away.

0
CookMySock 0 points ago +1 / -1

You are right, freedom of choice is part of the beauty of this country. You are free to abandon your principles for convenience, much like the other user is free to criticize you for it. Also, nobody here gives a fuck if you are black. Go pull the race card bullshit on websites that actually care.

2
CookMySock 2 points ago +2 / -0

I mean, its not. How many service members have already been spying on Americans electronically while at the NSA? I know for a fact a bunch of those dudes are right wing, but they still follow orders like good little sheep.

3
CookMySock 3 points ago +3 / -0

The military has been getting its ass kicked already, or are we just going to ignore the last 60 years worth of defeat?

I still have no idea why everyone talks up our military like its some badass killing machine. Inbred goat farmers who thought we were Russians beat us in Afghanistan with decades old kalashnikovs and shitty WW2 era weapons.

4
CookMySock 4 points ago +7 / -3

I for one welcome a weaker military. It won't just be feds coming for guns. A weaker military, at this point, only means a more secure citizenry.

2
CookMySock 2 points ago +2 / -0

Judging people by their religious beliefs is actually stupid. You must think Pence is a standup guy.

2
CookMySock 2 points ago +2 / -0

Weird, because inbred farmers who wear pajamas and thought Americans were Russians did well against those Abrams, and they have decades old shitty Ak-47s. This stupid ass fucking thought process of the military having expensive toys means they are invincible needs to stop getting pushed on this site. Y'all dumb fucks have somehow conveniently forgot America has been getting its ass kicked by uneducated farmers with shit equipment, and that this is the second time its happened in the last 60 years.

6
CookMySock 6 points ago +6 / -0

That's because law enforcement are inherently cowards, and will thus avoid the areas they face real danger.

2
CookMySock 2 points ago +2 / -0

The children of federal agents. I'm not seeing an issue.

3
CookMySock 3 points ago +3 / -0

Mortars and RPGs are far from the reason why the Taliban have won.

1
CookMySock 1 point ago +1 / -0

Like the U.S. is too cowardly to pick a fight with a worthy conventional adversary? Stupid comment. Only faggots and losers cry about fighting fairly.

1
CookMySock 1 point ago +1 / -0

You are gonna get downvotes because people can't handle the reality that the U.S. military is no longer top of the food chain, but you are right. While Russian planes and surface ships aren't superior to American, they do have superior tanks, submarines, and better trained soldiers. They also have better overall equipment than U.S. troops, and can actually carry out complex operations without relying on satellite based technology and communications. That is something the U.S. military is completely incapable of doing, and a conventional war would see the negation or destruction of both sides' satellites.

The U.S. surface fleet is also entirely useless since its greatest strength is also its greatest weakness; aircraft carriers are slow moving and vulnerable targets. On top of that, modern Russian air defense systems are fully capable of tracking and targeting U.S. aircraft.

Any war fought away from U.S. soil against the Russians would be a fucking disaster.

1
CookMySock 1 point ago +1 / -0

We don't have a SOFA with the PRC. What the fuck are you talking about?

1
CookMySock 1 point ago +1 / -0

No, the feds would opt for a repeat of the Civil War and do a scorched earth campaign. Also, you act like soldiers aren't just going to follow orders for the most part. Most of your active duty are liberal bootlickers. You might get some resistance at the National Guard, but that is obviously state dependent.

Also, how would secession be a losing game for the feds? They would simply tell the state no, then go to war with said state over it. You really think the United States government would let Texas secede from the union, thereby depriving the U.S. of a large portion of its natural resources, economy, and manpower and also at the same time create a major military and political rival on its border? Yeah, the alternative of civil war is definitely a more attractive prospect.

1
CookMySock 1 point ago +1 / -0

Also in the military, the flu vaccine isn't the Kung Flu vaccine, and our commanders aren't allowed to force us to take the Kung Flu shit.

1
CookMySock 1 point ago +1 / -0

What? There's a plethora of conventional military targets in the United States. On top of that, why the fuck would the feds allow a state (any state) to secede? That only invites more secession.

1
CookMySock 1 point ago +1 / -0

You got forced? Over here in Korea, they couldn't force us to take it, but they do force us to sign waivers if we volunteer to take it. I told them to fuck off and that I wasn't taking shit.

view more: Next ›