That isn't interacting with another driver, though. You aren't running a driver off the road, or bumping their car, or anything else. They aren't doing the same. There isn't any interaction going on, merely ways to get through a lap faster and faster.
Trying to say this is anything like interaction is basketball, baseball, or football is absolutely ridiculous. In those sports, one team directly interacts with the other. You can't hit the baseball without the opposing team pitching it to you, you can't reasonably expect to score a touchdown without getting tackled and you can't score a basket without the opposition trying to steal the ball.
You can't fuck with other drivers.
That's exactly what it is. Expect some heavy news about China, then about how they backed down in the face of "Biden's stalwart defense".
1776 had pretty limited support amongst colonists, actually. And the French didn't really do anything crazy until we had already fought several battles against the Brits. Extremism won us the day in 1776, ultimately, as it was the extremists who drew a line in the sand and backed it up with force.
Lol, project harder. Have fun today at the FBI. Watch out for the McVeighs out there, heard they did some real damage last time.
Talking to officials and representatives is actually nothing, though. Expecting to win through fair and equal politics and elections is literally retarded, and mentioning this as a viable plan is either retarded themselves or federal plants.
I agree, but the tweet doesn't state she herself committed these actions, merely that she participated in the same program which produced these actions. Based on the tweet, sounds like she was in a management role at the time. It also doesn't absolve her of destroying the evidence related to this.
By that definition auto racing wouldn't be a sport, either. Fastest time wins. Its not like you can intentionally interfere with other racers.
I certainly won't argue that gaming, chess, or card games are sports, as I don't believe they are. Your definition of what a sport is, is rather odd IMO. I for one consider track and cross country to be sports.
"If We KiLL tHEM tHEY WiN"
I feel like I heard this somewhere before.
Gonna hi-jack top comment to say commenters are missing the value in this. These two groups are the enemy; let them fuck each other up. Cheer them on, make them grow weaker and even more tense with one another.
This doesn't matter if we still rely on voting. We don't control the votes, they do. On top of that, the people have shown themselves to be easily fooled and weak. They will simply be fooled again.
You ignore whatever orders affect you, and if big brother comes knocking, well...
Whatever happens after is up to you. I already know where I stand.
No, they are certainly for killing other people. They were originally designed to kill people, and for the most part their modern design is around the most effective and efficient way of killing people.
Shying away from this is pointless and does more harm than good. People need to be comfortable with the fact that, when they buy a weapon (especially an AR15, AK47, or handgun) its to give themselves an advantage over other humans.
I disagree. He should've weaponized his base, and set them loose if the intent was to remove deep rooted corruption. The surgical bullshit this board expected is nothing but fantasy. Revolution is violent, ugly, and bloody.
No, Eastern Europeans didn't bring it down. The United States and the Soviet Union did by bankrupting the country, and with Gorbachev of all people being head of state. He allowed the socialist republics to break away from the Soviet Union, then the Soviet Union literally voted itself out of existence.
Also, those Eastern Europeans had fought a series of violent uprisings against the Soviets over decades. It wasn't some peaceful, passive bullshit, and in the case of Romania there was still a violent overthrow.
Christianity also didn't save the Russians. Relying on religion for salvation in the mortal world is foolish, and not what religion is supposed to be about.
It's a pretty strong and common argumentative tactic to speak quickly and run through a range of ideas and positions while doing so before giving someone else a chance to respond. Its extremely difficult for someone to respond to every point appropriately in a timely manner, something audiences will take note of but from the view that the opposition has no idea what they are talking about.
And like you said, he has a large vocabulary which only exacerbates this issue. He's a hack.
That's no longer a concern, as RINOs are in league with Democrats, and neither will allow one of ours into office. If elections can be cheated this blatantly now, we won't have fair elections again. Its time to lose the mindset of winning elections, as this game can't be won. We need to play an entirely different game now.
I mean, you can disagree all you want. The hand cannon and fire lance were literally designed with war in mind, and were intended to not only scare the shit out of their enemies but to also kill and maim them through explosive power and shrapnel/debris. They sure as shit weren't designed to kill fucking deer.
Also, firearms are the most efficient means of dispatching an enemy, with the only real situation where this isn't the case being a foe who is so close one cannot actually maneuver their firearm to pose a threat. Also, the availability of other means of defense has nothing to do with the overall purpose of firearms in the place, which is to kill people. The founders wrote the second amendment with this in mind, modern firearms are almost universally designed with this is mind, and your most popular firearms platforms have been designed with this in mind.