5
Cool 5 points ago +6 / -1

There are 43 lovely people registered to vote in at the Superior Rehabilitation Center in Superior WI. They are all indefinitely confined, and happened to ALL return their ballots in the same week in September

8
Cool 8 points ago +8 / -0

This one's legit. There same phone number is registered to 43 people in WI. Not much is the same about them except a lot of them have their mailing address THE SAME PO box. I'm talking 43 people all with different last names and addresses.

1
Cool 1 point ago +1 / -0

Thanks. There are 40k + interstate votes in the GA election and 30k + in WI. Pretty big numbers.

3
Cool 3 points ago +3 / -0

Also I realised GA Post ID is not unique.

8
Cool 8 points ago +8 / -0

Thanks pede, you convinced me to submit my dozen finds to their website.

2
Cool 2 points ago +2 / -0

SO there are 47 matches in the first data set. I'm not sure if this is actionable though?

1
Cool 1 point ago +1 / -0

To be fair, they tested 17 batches. But there are other counties that declared in advance that they weren't going to be doing any testing!

1
Cool 1 point ago +1 / -0

There are three counties that didn't bother!

2
Cool 2 points ago +2 / -0

Further - " In accordance with A.R.S. § 16-602(link is external), county election officers are required to conduct a hand count of a sample of ballots to test the accuracy of the vote tabulation equipment if there is participation from the county political parties. Those counties that conduct the hand count are required by law to report the results to the Secretary of State. "

1
Cool 1 point ago +1 / -0

I did the math wrong...but anyway. How is the audit board not providing a reason for the discrency? They sample 4239 out of 413k votes and found an unexplained issue.

1
Cool 1 point ago +1 / -0

I dont want to enter my personal details. I found it from the data that was shared re-Wisconsin absentee ballots so my info isn't pertinent.

1
Cool 1 point ago +1 / -0

High probable fraud. Person lives in NYC. Same 3 people registered to her phone number and address. Job title = Inclusion & Diversity Events Specialist

1
Cool 1 point ago +1 / -0

I've looked at the first dataset. I found a few things that might be readily investigated further but don't know what to do with it. Any thoughts?

1
Cool 1 point ago +1 / -0

I only looked at the smaller dataset because my internet was too slow to download 6gb. Would be cool if anyone can dump in rows of 500k.

What to do.

  1. Count by telephone number
  2. Look up address of most frequently occuring telephone number
  3. Look at the % that voted absentee for the first time.
  4. Consider any weird deals about the names, address, EMAIL addresses, etc. for said address.

e.g. Oh look. There's a phone number that shows up 17 times. Ok. All same address, fine. a. It's an office number for a nursing home? Interesting. b. 79 people are registered at the main address. Ok. c. ~ 30% of them are voting for the first time by absentee. Ok. d. Only 1 person has an email address, not a big deal. e. A lot of them registered in July and January. f. The nursing home has two facilities but no residents are at registered for the other facilities - no idea what that means

0
Cool 0 points ago +1 / -1

Let me rephrase: you are an antisemite because you say the same things antisemites say. The fact that it's so well aligned with the leftists makes it not worth arguing about.

If you dont like Bibi fine - not many people do. It's what you say after that makes me know that your post is in bad faith.

1
Cool 1 point ago +2 / -1

He fucking congratulated the guy...low energy greviance

2
Cool 2 points ago +2 / -0

that's 89% precincts...not votes. still missing like half the votes.

1
Cool 1 point ago +1 / -0

I don’t know how it varies by age but the more the better right? Not saying it’s unhealthy at current levels just that the parent comment wasn’t wrong (and was heavily downvoted when I commented)

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›