Most are child custody cases. Just like the kids on the milk cartons. Look at the last names of the "abductor" and the child. Probably 80% or more of the time they are the same because the "abductor" is actually daddy. Wake up.
Which is a reflection on his own poor decision making. I mean how many times do you have to get fucked by your on attorney general before you realize you might want to be a little bit more selective in your appointment process?
Lawyer here. There's an exception to the mooteness doctrine called "capable of repetition but evading review," which essentially means that even if a case or an issue is moot, if it can happen again and evade judicial review, then the court can still address the issue. This is a perfect example of that exception. Thus, the mooteness doctrine did not preclude the Supreme Court from hearing the case. They chose not to hear it.
Wrong. If a white man does what needs to be done, you and 99% of the rest of the country sitting on their jury will vote to convict. The only power you have left lies in the power of acquittal. Stop serving the state's purpose with blue lives matters bullshit and start acquitting any white defendants accused of any white on black crime. Full stop. Yes it's a rather blunt tool to use on a more nuanced situation, but sometimes that's just how it has to be. There are always collateral casualties in any war.