53
CowForCow 53 points ago +53 / -0

Please read The creature from Jekyll Island! It’s a mandatory read if you want to know what the hell is wrong with this country.

1
CowForCow 1 point ago +1 / -0

Someone has to distribute the checks.

0
CowForCow 0 points ago +1 / -1

My statement would only be contradictory if I expected that every other person besides cops didn’t need to be taken on a case by case basis.

No more protected classes.

Every minority, freak, and sexual deviant is a special little flower that needs to be cherished by everyone and give them lots of free stuff in the mind of the left.

We are no better if we do the same with our little blocks.

2
CowForCow 2 points ago +2 / -0

I actually have a ball sack bro.
I live by my principles I know that’s probably hard for you to fathom, but I literally packed up my family and moved them out of CA and took a job that pays like half of what I used to make so I could be involved in something moral.
I literally told my boss that I was incapable of continuing to work for him because the job didn’t align with my values.
So yeah great example. 😆
I understand that you may be in possession of a big pussy, but don’t project your insecurities on me. 👌🏻

1
CowForCow 1 point ago +1 / -0

Why would I wanna back any group of people at all for any reason as a block?
People need to prove themselves as individuals.
I’m still waiting to see where the chips fall when the national guard gets involved in this.
I say this as a vet.

3
CowForCow 3 points ago +4 / -1

Don’t talk about cops as some sort of block. They have prove they must be taking a case by case basis.

Skepticism and distrust until proof of friendship are pretty much a must at this point.

2
CowForCow 2 points ago +2 / -0

The difference is the comps are the ones enforcing the bad policy. It’s one thing to follow an unconstitutional law (which I believe is wrong and proves that you are a coward) it’s another thing to be part of the enforcement of those laws.

I’m sure you, a friend of yours, or family are probably in law-enforcement, if that’s the case I would really recommend re-thinking your standpoint last when the tides turn you end up finding yourself allied with your enemies.

6
CowForCow 6 points ago +6 / -0

Of course it does.
The world works the way the world works.
The world doesn’t obey your sensibilities.
Government funded police exist and have always existed to serve their government.
I recommend you realign your way of thinking to match with that of human history.

Just because someone likes to act masculine, and drink a Budweiser while watching the football game, and collect guns, and put on a uniform, doesn’t make them in American.

They are status cop.

2
CowForCow 2 points ago +3 / -1

If you never have to worry about a reelection corporations don’t really have any control over you any longer. Once you get in if you never have to be reelected the corporation has no way to screw you during a midterm or such.

Imagine you’re job makes you one of the most powerful people on the planet and you I’ve been trying to get into the position your entire life. You’ve had to defeat hundreds of other people along your way to the top. Every two years you half to go through the stress of potentially losing your job. Losing is a massive public disgrace. No wonder so many politicians will bend over backwards to get reelected.
Without this mechanism our politicians aren’t as beholden to their corporate financier.

6
CowForCow 6 points ago +6 / -0

I would prefer to make the terms longer but also remove the ability to be reelected. I think it’s during the reelection process that politicians get freaked out and are easily bribed. I think one term for each politician per branch makes the most sense. I would also get rid of the judges get a lifetime appointment and make it a 15-20 year gig. The idea is once A politician is in they are in for a set period of time they no longer have to worry about elections and when they’re done they get to resign gracefully and don’t feel like they’ve been dishonored by losing.

12
CowForCow 12 points ago +13 / -1

I think historically this has actually proved to be the exact opposite of true.

2
CowForCow 2 points ago +2 / -0

I’m so blown away how people think corruption didn’t exist before the Internet, The world didn’t get shitty after the Internet showed up We noticed it’s shittyness because of the Internet.

5
CowForCow 5 points ago +5 / -0

Sorry man, most of us are millennials. And a lot of us are pretty soft.

14
CowForCow 14 points ago +14 / -0

He was an extraordinarily genius person.
He realized his works would never be published.
He wanted his works to be published.
He got his works published.

Not an endorsement just a sad sorry observation.

1
CowForCow 1 point ago +2 / -1

My intention is to focus the messaging to that witch is most pressing. Organization and tactics. We have had nearly 5 years of memes. Let’s get 5 weeks of action.

4
CowForCow 4 points ago +4 / -0

BuT THey wERe fOUNdEd fOR lEGiTimATe rEASonS.
ITs A sHAme PeOPle Have GOtteN coRUpt iN tHe lAst 10-40 YeArS BeFORe thAt AMeriCA wAS coRuPtioN FrEe!!¡!

Ya chasing down small time “moonshiners” after the government decided they have the authority to stop people from drinking. Isn’t it interesting how all the “speakeasies” did the mob bosses and the politicians from that time stayed untouched but Uncle Duffy got thrown in the slammer.

3
CowForCow 3 points ago +3 / -0

It’s supper acutely the finger lakes some guy on the Chan’s did an overlay they match up 100%

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›