Sounds like Trump campaign is pretty confident in AZ. I think unfortunately it is going to all come down to a court battle over PA.
The Pittsburgh Post-Gazette endorsed Trump yesterday. It is the first time since 1972 that the paper has endorsed a Republican for President.
Does PA even have in-person early voting anywhere?
I know that Rasmussen has been relatively reliable in predicting previous elections, and I used to trust them compared to the MSM polls. However, Rasmussen's polls lately have been just as schizophrenic and unbelievable as the MSM polls that I have zero trust in them anymore. How the hell can Biden be leading by double digits one week and then Trump leading by 1 point the next week. It makes NO sense. Also, in this most recent poll, Trump has only 84 percent of the Republican vote and Biden has an even smaller share of the Democratic vote at 77 percent. Yet, somehow Biden leads with independents by 7 points. There is absolutely no sense it that at all.
Bottom line, i don't believe that there are any polls in this day and age (regardless of whether they show Trump ahead or behind) that are anywhere near accurate. The only poll that matters is November 3.
The fact that the tweet got 21k likes means that he is not the only idiot. This is what we're up against folks.
IMO, the Trump campaign needs to immediately make an ad which utilizes that clip of Joe from last night's debate and then run that ad incessantly on TV in Pennsylvania over the next 10 days. At this point, if he wins PA, he wins the election.
That is what I suspected, and it scares the shit out if me. If there are too many people with this horrible "Joe Biden is a nice old moderate" misconception, then this may pose a problem for Trump, especially in places like the rust belt and Pennsylvania. I hope I am wrong.
I have a serious question. What is it about Joe that these women "love"? Is it just that he's not Trump? Or is there something that these women truly like about him? If there is, I'd sure as he'll love to know what it is.
This is still way too close. Shame that he seems to be doing worst in Pennsylvania. As a Pennsylvanian, I am so ashamed that we have so many fucking idiots here. Hopefully, he can still squeak out a win here, but I am skeptical especially given Cuck Roberts recent decision which opens the floodgates for an absolute deluge of voter fraud.
Most of the counties around Philly are incredibly cucked and unfortunately very populous, and will vote for Biden undoubtedly. The key for Trump is keeping the margin of loss as low as possible. If Trump loses these counties (most of which he certainly will) by as small a margin as possible, heavy Trump support in other parts of the state could help even things out and help him pull out a win.
Yeah. Pennsylvania does not have in person early voting, so the "early voting" numbers that are coming in are just from mail in ballots. Republican voters are extremely hesitant to vote by mail because as someone else above said, they fear tomfoolery, especially in Pennsylvania where there have been multiple news stories about mail in ballots being found in dumpsters and the like. So, Democrats were always expected to have a huge lead when taking into consideration the mail in ballots alone because very few Republicans feel comfortable voting by mail. As long as Republicans come out in yuge numbers on Election Day, I think that they should be able to make up the deficit.
Just out of curiosity, does anyone know where they get these figures from? Do they ask poll questions of the rally attendees? Or are they getting the info from some database? These are very encouraging numbers, if true. I am just curious as to how they come up with the figures.
Unfortunately i think this is true. I get the sense that there is a certain segment of voters who believe that Joe Biden is an acceptable old guard, "moderate" Democrat like JFK or Bill Clinton. They don't realize that Joe Biden is just a demented puppet for the uber left wing puppetmasters that have taken over the party, so they will vote for Biden thinking he is an acceptable moderate alternative to Trump, and I am just concerned about places like Pennsylvania where a lot of these older-school Democrats still make up a large segment of the voting base.
I don't mean to be a concern troll, but it's just a thought I had.
That is great insight. Thanks for sharing. I hope there are a LOT more like you out there.
Wow...4 hours. Hopefully that line of people was mostly Trump voters. Did it look like they were mostly MAGA people? Are you in a conservative area?
I see people blaming PA and the oil and gas workers for voting against their own interest, but I think that is immensely unfair. The problem is not PA as a whole; it is pretty much just Philly and the limousine liberals in the Philly suburbs. So it is not fair to hold it against the oil and gas workers in western PA and northern PA who probably did want to save their jobs and probably did vote for Trump in high numbers. In fact, Trump got more votes in PA than he did in 2016. As is always the case in elections, the based patriots who make up a vast majority in every other part of the state get fucked in the ass by Philly and its surrounding suburbs.
And it did not help that our wonderful governor and his TDS administration devised a scheme and used covid as an excuse to send out ballots to directly to the home of every registered Democrat and ensure that it was as easy as possible for every lazy fucker in the inner cities (people who normally could not be bothered to vote) to cast their ballot. No wonder "turnout" was so high; the Democrats practically dragged a voting machine into the home of every lazy Democrat.
Oh, yeah, and then there is the Philly fraud factor.
Trust me there are a shit ton of based Pennsylvanians that would love to annex Philly into NJ or DE.