2
Creditedlemon 2 points ago +2 / -0

Today is the opening arguments and then evidence hearing is set for 19th though I’m not sure what the difference is.

2
Creditedlemon 2 points ago +2 / -0

He’s the guy saying he has evidence that 600,000+ PA ballots are illegal and will be thrown out... I’m keeping my hopes high but expectations low to be honest as I don’t wanna be disappointed. Time will tell.

1
Creditedlemon 1 point ago +1 / -0

There’s been some changes in terms of which lawyers are going to be representing Trump over the last 12 hours so who knows. Better Giuliani is involved than not, I’d say.

3
Creditedlemon 3 points ago +3 / -0

Probably pressure. The filing says they are asking to be allowed to stop representing the plaintiff.

3
Creditedlemon 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yeah it’s a Obama appointee so hopefully while Democrat pick maybe he was annoyed by the request and that will set the “mood”

1
Creditedlemon 1 point ago +1 / -0

I’ll have to check. I’m on a free trial of the database and some stuff requires payment.

2
Creditedlemon 2 points ago +2 / -0

Basis was that it is more convenient for her because they’re busy setting up to certify the election/paperwork etc and that it’s a hassle to get everyone to travel. Dismissal didn’t say reason in the brief summary but they might upload a pdf with the actual ruling reasons and I’ll let you know.

2
Creditedlemon 2 points ago +2 / -0

Oh I had no idea. I’ll have to look that up that’s awesome

1
Creditedlemon 1 point ago +2 / -1

That’s the really upsetting part. If Biden wins it’ll be from fraud and there’s no undoing it even if evidence shows up later.

4
Creditedlemon 4 points ago +4 / -0

I usually only brows and rarely post; figured I’d just ask for a different perspective today...

1
Creditedlemon 1 point ago +2 / -1

I’m def not a concern troll lol you can look my name up on Reddit and I barely have any political posts. I’m legit asking because it’s kinda upsetting seeing the news about all this

view more: ‹ Prev