But his own ex-wife Justine Musk refuted that claim calling him a liar as she was holding the child when he was declared dead. In his justification for not allowing Alex Jones back on the platform Elon projected exactly what he himself was doing in the very tweet itself.
Sorry, but what is in these "Twitter Files" that we didn't already know and wasn't already openly admitted to? We knew from the jump that The Laptop was real. We knew that the material was authentic. We knew that the FBI was lying about it and actively intervening.
The fact that the corporate press "confirmed" all this later means little on its own, other than serving as further validation of the "trickle truth" process; an obvious truth is pointed out by some dissenting voice, the institutions nakedly flex their muscle to suppress the dissenter, and then when the information no longer poses a threat to the interests of those institutions, they "come clean" by copping to that truth with softened, PR-tailored language. "Oh, we've just learned..." Just learned something that was obviously true all along.
We saw this all throughout COVID, and we've seen it in the past with the War on Terror and other panic-based institutional narratives.
The "Twitter Files" are just another layer of this. The Dissent-Lite folx who are fawning over this stuff are simply participating in and validating the trickle truth process. There may be little tidbits in there that were previously unknown, like the specific exchanges between people, but there's nothing earth-shattering. It adds nothing to the general arc of the story, which is that the government, the press, and the social media companies actively colluded to suppress the Biden Laptop story.
Sorry, but what is in these "Twitter Files" that we didn't already know and wasn't already openly admitted to? We knew from the jump that The Laptop was real. We knew that the material was authentic. We knew that the FBI was lying about it and actively intervening.
The fact that the corporate press "confirmed" all this later means little on its own, other than serving as further validation of the "trickle truth" process; an obvious truth is pointed out by some dissenting voice, the institutions nakedly flex their muscle to suppress the dissenter, and then when the information no longer poses a threat to the interests of those institutions, they "come clean" by copping to that truth with softened, PR-tailored language. "Oh, we've just learned..." Just learned something that was obviously true all along.
We saw this all throughout COVID, and we've seen it in the past with the War on Terror and other panic-based institutional narratives.
The "Twitter Files" are just another layer of this. The Dissent-Lite folx who are fawning over this stuff are simply participating in and validating the trickle truth process. There may be little tidbits in there that were previously unknown, like the specific exchanges between people, but there's nothing earth-shattering. It adds nothing to the general arc of the story, which is that the government, the press, and the social media companies actively colluded to suppress the Biden Laptop story.
Recently, during a Twitter exchange about reinstating the account of Alex Jones, Elon claimed that his child died in his arms. But his own ex-wife Justine Musk refuted that claim calling him a liar as she was holding the child when he was declared dead. In his justification for not allowing Alex Jones back on the platform Elon projected exactly what he himself was doing in the very tweet itself.