1
Ctor 1 point ago +1 / -0

I got some black relatives via marriages and half black relatives by blood who would whole heartedly agree. They despise the subset that causes crime and chaos, and are embarrassed by this subset (even tho i tell them THEY dont need to be embarrassed since they aren't the ones doing bad stuff). They (my relatives) are business owners veterans etc and would get along with people here quite well... Aside from the racist dumbasses.

1
Ctor 1 point ago +1 / -0

https://youtu.be/-Rwp-TlVY-U

I realize this is a youtube link, but shes actually somewhat cute, unless she goes for the super nerdy look, and not a complete shit actress... Some of her college humor clips show actual talent. Imo she got screwed by crappy writing and directing. And you cant blame someone who is starting out in a career for taking a chance on a well paying role... Her well paying role just happened to suck.

0
Ctor 0 points ago +1 / -1

Well they gotta get a start somewhere. Look at shatner and eastwood's early work. Actors will take any job they need to in order to eat. They dont always have the luxury of choosing good roles when starting out. So no i dont blame them.

1
Ctor 1 point ago +1 / -0

She did indeed take shots at people after being encouraged to do so by leftists. She had a bad response to it imo. But she also got given a shit role. The shit role also made her some money, which she promptly used to pay off student loans, make good investments, etc. So its a win and a loss, and i dont feel TOO bad for her, but the movie sucked imo. And her character sucked IMO. And neither of those things is her fault.

2
Ctor 2 points ago +3 / -1

The makeup was shit too. Kelly marie tran, the non super model can be cute in some of the non star wars pics online. They gave her a mop haircut, accentuated her face in a very non flattering way, and put loose fitting clothes that made her look fat, which she isnt. Shes actually a somewhat attractive gal though as pointed out, not a super model. Its almost like they gave her the "ugly betty" treatment. Someone on the film crew probably had it in for her.

4
Ctor 4 points ago +4 / -0

People tend to associate actors with the roles the play and it can be very unfair to the actors. Its not their fault they got shitty roles.

2
Ctor 2 points ago +2 / -0

Actually there was a good movie made about non white heroes which hollywood didnt play up at all. Its called "ride the thunder" and its about south vietnamese marines. A lot of people here would actually enjoy the film and i think it would have been more successful if promoted better. But its a good film.

2
Ctor 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yes. These could be good movies. How bout adding chappie james or david lamson to that mix. Or frederick douglas? Or an action movie about Roy Benavidez? Americans and people abroad would watch and enjoy films about real life heroes if they were done right. Hell a movie about george washington carver would be enjoyable

5
Ctor 5 points ago +6 / -1

Its kinda like the asian actress in star wars in a way... The character was poorly written and developed. Even a great actor can only do so much with that. I kinda feel bad for the actress since people hated the character and took it out on the actress... Also for the poor dude who played jar jar binks... Shitty writing puts actors in a bad spot. The only exceptions are things like ace ventura... The writing for that film was HORRIBLE... But jim carrey being who he is as an actor was able to save the film with pure wackiness.

4
Ctor 4 points ago +4 / -0

Jack asked elon to take over. Probably lost control of his company tbh.

1
Ctor 1 point ago +1 / -0

Exactly. Worship as you see fit. No torture for being a heretic. No forcible practice of religion. No interference in practice of religion.

4
Ctor 4 points ago +5 / -1

Not so. More intended to allow for different exercise of faith without government using faith to justify abuses. The founders were well aware of the spanish inquisition (though nobody would expect that), the abuse and oppression of catholics and other denominations in england and so on. They wanted people to be able to practice their own religions as they see fit... Without government interference. Thats what it means. Thats its intent.

1
Ctor 1 point ago +1 / -0

Dude i agree insofar as only taxpaying responsible citizens should be taking part in elections. But i know of husbands who have reportedly let their wives fill in their mail in ballots... I also very much would like to have kids. But leftism is ruining everything.

1
Ctor 1 point ago +1 / -0

Guy may be one his way to becoming one of us...

2
Ctor 2 points ago +3 / -1

1 is kinda dumb. No kids here since i cant afford to have any thanks to shitty dem policies. Why should i be deprived of the vote? Also with regards to 2... Who decides who in the household gets to vote?

1
Ctor 1 point ago +1 / -0

RFK Jr does seem to care about this country and its people. He also has had a front row seat to how the political system operates.

1
Ctor 1 point ago +1 / -0

https://www.military.com/air-force/gen-daniel-chappie-james-jr.html

Heres a different link to the history of this great man. We need more men who love america as he did in our military. The man was a hero and a patriot

"I'm a citizen of the United States of America and I'm no second-class citizen either and no man here is, unless he thinks like one and reasons like one and performs like one. This is my country and I believe in her, and I will serve her, and I'll contribute to her welfare whenever and however I can. If she has any ills, I'll stand by her until in God's given time, through her wisdom and her consideration for the welfare of the entire nation, she will put them right."

1
Ctor 1 point ago +1 / -0

I think the link didnt go through... Chill out bro

3
Ctor 3 points ago +3 / -0

Thats the largest thing thats wrong... Most dc politicians havent lost their jobs.

12
Ctor 12 points ago +12 / -0

This is one of the travesties of modern society. We treat people who work WAY worse than people who dont.

view more: Next ›