Best victory is no fight at all. This is how China looks set to win the US.
A victory with no fight is a possible victory for patriots, if patriots get to work actively involved in politics.
Second-best victory would be one strike.
Can you elaborate on that? Why is it nothing? What would be a notable aneurysm in comparison?
It's gonna be so exciting watching them be infertile, etc, in 3 years. 😁
To me, it's starting to look more and more like a comedy 😄
That's probably even more true thank you think!
You would think they would see all the news about obesity correlated with worse Covid outcomes, and maybe start a routine of squats and pushups and maybe eat less.
Nope! Depending on age group, about half the people gained weight – and of millennials who gained weight, they gained 41 lbs on average!
You don't have to apologize here. :)
Accumulating and re-breathing bacteria seems to me like the more significant issue.
Not to mention that some masks have been found to be toxic and were given to children.
It suppresses symptoms, which makes it a vaccine in the same way that we have a "vaccine" for the Marek's virus in chickens.
The vaccine for the Marek's virus also suppresses symptoms but allows the virus to reproduce and propagate. As a result, vaccinated chickens become petri dishes for incredibly nasty strains of the virus, the hottest of which are capable of killing 100% of unvaccinated chickens within 10 days.
One of the possible endgames is that the globalists know this, and that they're trying to create Marek's virus for humans. Covid itself is mild, but if they get enough people vaccinated, the vaccinated population may become a breeding ground for nasty versions of Covid that will kill the unvaccinated.
Perhaps enough have already been vaccinated for this to occur.
Culture is definitely the problem that needs fixing, but you can't raise IQ. That part is hereditary and is part of a vicious cycle.
Why don't Asians have a vicious cycle of bad culture breeding worse? They have a characteristic look, they're easily recognizable, they have a culture, they could fall into a vicious cycle. Yes?
No, because their average IQs are above white average (105 vs 100). They integrate and do well in society because that's the smart thing to do. They do the smart thing because they're smart. No vicious cycle.
Smart blacks aren't doing poorly, either. Is Candace Owens doing poorly? Is Oprah doing poorly? Tiger Woods? We could go on naming black folks who are doing better than almost any of us here. They're smart. Smart people do well, even if Oprah is awful.
For the remaining blacks, the vicious cycle looks like this. Have lower average IQ => make bad decisions => be less useful and do harm => get noted for association between harm and skin color => be excluded => get surrounded by other people who are in same shit => form the kind of culture that is formed by people who are in that kind of shit => raise new generation in that kind of culture.
There may be ways to fix the culture, but the correlation between skin color, and being less useful and doing harm, will continue to exist for generations. Such a correlation can only be diluted by races mixing. And as long as the correlation exists, reasons for racism will exist, because racism is seeing correlations (correct) and applying them to individuals (prejudiced).
You need to sign up for the vaccine weeks in advance. Maybe they already know what to give you, hmm.
Link to actual article. Yeadon's statements are being completely and dangerously misrepresented by the OP image.
What's doing damage is that the OP image completely misrepresents Yeadon's actual statements, changing reasonable and qualified statements into definite predictions which he did not make.
Here is the actual article. Yeadon makes sense. OP is trying to portray him different, possibly with intent to damage rather than help.
It's hard to say if they are planning something or if they're just imprudent to the point of being deranged. If they're just being imprudent, this would require us to accept that the election fraud and the theft of the United States presidency was planned, the cooperation of media and the government agencies and the courts was planned, that the putting of patients into nursing homes was planned, the overcounting of Covid cases is planned, but the vaccines and the propaganda that surrounds them are just the elite being imprudent.
It sounds weird that everything else is obviously coordinated and planned, but the vaccines are just accidentally imprudent.
Yeadon is not making any of the unqualified claims in the OP image. He's pointing out what's possible. As a society, we should not be in a place where these things are possible.
We don't really know because long-term effects weren't tested! It's more important to put the vaccines into immediate use against this devastating, lethal disease that has caused people to die at an average age same as when people die anyway.
Usually we do longer-term clinical trials on animals and then 5-10 years on humans. This time we're just skipping that and doing them straight on tens of millions of people that their employers are forcing to get vaccines. What could go wrong?
On the other hand, it's kinda nice how universities like Rutgers have billion-$ endowments. Since vaccine manufacturers aren't liable, it looks like the universities who are forcing their students to take these vaccines will soon be spending those endowments on compensation for vaccine injuries.
Saving stuff to your hard drive does not slow your computer unless you've invented some way of saving stuff that slows the computer in a really unusual, unexpected way.
Yeadon said NONE OF THESE THINGS with the certainty claimed in the OP image. Here is the actual article:
He's not saying "X or Y will happen", he's pointing out various things that could happen. Given the lying and propaganda that surrounds supposed "dangerous new Covid strains" and the vaccines, he's pointing out something is off in a big way. He's not saying what exactly.
He also said NONE OF THESE THINGS with the certainty claimed in the OP image. Here is the actual article:
Yeadon said NONE OF THESE THINGS with the certainty claimed in the OP image. Here is the actual article:
Of course "racism" exists. "Racism" is the act of noticing differences that exist in practice. "Anti-racism" is the hate of people who notice real differences.
(Unfortunately, leftists ruined the word. It used to mean people who discriminate and think poorly of individuals based merely on color. Now we have no word for that, and "racist" means nothing, or its closest actual meaning is "not insane".)
The leftists decided they had been too tolerant with people who are intolerant, and they should now be intolerant against them. People who were intolerant used to disagree with leftists, so leftists now assume all who disagree with them are intolerant.
Government will not become better by just eliminating the bads. They also have to be replaced with good people.
The whole problem is caused by lack of active involvement by good people. If good people don't get actively involved, nothing can improve even by eliminating bads. And if enough good people get involved, the bads can simply be removed and made irrelevant.
Conservatives are patient and wise, and they will actually win this in the best way possible. This might be simply by getting involved with local politics and building up momentum from the ground up – a victory best achieved with no violence at all.