Elsewhere in this thread is compelling speculation that what they're trying to do is to create Marek's for humans.
Articles like the one I linked to came out in 2015. That's when a study conclusively showed that the Marek's vaccine indeed creates extremely nasty versions of the Marek's virus in chicken. The virus was a nuisance when there wasn't a vaccine. Then a vaccine was developed, but it is leaky: vaccinated chicken still spread the virus, but do not suffer from it. This leads to creation of nasty strains of Marek's virus which do not kill the vaccinated chicks, but absolutely devastate all unvaccinated ones.
This coincides interestingly with the timeline of the US funding "gain of function" research for coronaviruses at the Wuhan lab.
Covid-19 is a non-disease, but it has an extreme amount of propaganda behind it. The propagandists are brazenly lying in people's faces that the vaccines are safe when the clinical trials have been underway for less than a year, and long-term consequences could not have been observed yet. They're pushing to exclude people from the economy for not taking the experimental vaccines. Some countries are planning to penalize doctors for not taking them.
Why?
They are leaky vaccines. They do not stop transmission. They are trying to create Marek's for humans!
If you believe it, that's what happens. 1000s of vids are 1000s of situations where the world formed itself in a way that supports your beliefs. :)
You will always also find evidence for other beliefs, if you choose to look for it and adopt them. Then you will find evidence for those beliefs that will make it seem silly why you ever had these beliefs. You can do this as long as you want, with any beliefs.
It is attractive to desire what we think of as bad outcomes for people with bad intent, but what they're actually going to experience is what they think of as bad outcomes, not us. :)
The important part is to always be aware that one's own participation in their reality is voluntary, i.e. if you don't disbelieve that a better outcome is possible, then a better outcome is likely to be experienced by you, and the outcomes they chose do not matter. In the world you choose, you will see them rightfully punished, etc, unless you believe that such people always evade punishment, etc.
Stupid, no. Unwise as fuck, yes.
This kind of scheming ends with suffering of the schemers. They don't understand how the world really works. There are spiritual rules where this can only happen to people who want to enter such a timeline. It doesn't happen to people who do not.
The timeline where they fail is where we live. If that's really what they're doing, then we probably lynch them. The timeline where they succeed is where they live. There, they get to enjoy the consequences of their choices, which turn out to be less heavenly than they imagined.
... "or had symptoms of depression!" Geez dude! BPD is pretty heavy, but I think it's fair to say half the population probably exhibit symptoms of depression when observed for long enough.
That's an important difference. 700,000 side effects implies maybe 7,000, at most 70,000 deaths.
Of course, 70,000 is probably still more than Covid:
Based on data for all recorded U.S. deaths through Aug. 23, 2020, the new CDC system counted 161,392 that were attributed to the virus. Using the older system, the death total was only 9,684.
he want to use birth control AND vaccines to slow population growth
In this case, ostensibly by "vaccines" he means a higher rate of child survival in developing countries, which reduces birth rate because people don't need to have children "just in case". Ostensibly. That's how he explains it, and it's why it takes 20 years: to build trust.
If he wanted to just kill people with vaccines, that could be quicker. :) It would also backfire because soon, no one would take vaccines.
I'm pretty sure Gates has an honest belief in the goodness of vaccines. The problem is his hubris, the belief that medical interventions are like engineering (they are not) and that he can ignore inconvenient ethics to achieve a goal, just like he did to build Microsoft.
What makes it not-real? If it's shopped, then the work is pretty thorough, the letters even have specs of dirt consistent with the dirt on the window.
I hope Chauvin is found not guilty because he's f-in not guilty, based on evidence we've seen so far.
Yep. :) You can just select one of the characters and search for it:
Braille Pattern Dots-12347 (U+284F)
Impressive!
It doesn't "almost completely eliminate the possibility", but it reduces the chance of HIV transmission (which is low enough to begin with) by 50% to circumcised men compared to uncircumcised men.
Other benefits include mostly eliminated risk of penile cancer (believed caused by HPV), better hygiene, etc.
The main down side is that the head of a circumcised penis is vastly less sensitive than the head of an uncircumcised penis. As someone who has experienced both, I can tell you the difference is staggering. It's like the light of a sunny day compared to a full moon.
Don't circumcise your child. The health benefits are not worth it – not to mention that the circumcision can itself go wrong.
According to a witness, it doesn't sound like self-defense:
Then again, who knows if the witness can be trusted.
(But then again, what 14-year-old walks around with a stolen gun?)
Fuck opsec. If they start killing people, let them kill me first so I have less of this shit to endure.
It used to be Woodrow Wilson High School until Floyd overdosed: 🤦♂️
In July 2020, Portland Public Schools pledged to rename Wilson High School in response to pressure from the community in light of the racial justice movement that followed the death of George Floyd. In January 2021, the name was changed to Ida B. Wells-Barnett High School.
Jewish culture self-selects for racial supremacy. The only way you can be recognized as a Jew, by other Jews, is if you were born to a Jewish mother. Intermarriage with a non-Jewish woman therefore means ending the Jewish lineage for the children, which means your descendants will be white.
I know two smart, beautiful women who were rejected by their boyfriends' Jewish families because they were not born Jewish. One even learned Hebrew, studied Judaism and was ready to convert. No go.
Since there are relatively few Jewish women compared to ALL available women, this means almost all Jewish men who don't care about Jewish supremacy end up (1) alienating their family, and (2) producing descendants indistinguishable from white. So the only people whom we can identify as having a Jewish descent are by necessity associated with a culture of Jewish supremacy.
I know some based black chicks that happen to be hot AF. I don't only mean Candace and other people on TV. What's unattractive is the mentality, not color. And if the person lets their body bloat to marine life proportions, that's a reflection of mentality, too.
BTW, even if anthropogenic global warming existed – which it probably doesn't, and there are other sources and scientists who point this out – planting trees would do next to nothing. To reverse the release of CO2 (if that were a real problem), it's not enough to plant one generation of trees to cover the Earth. It would be necessary to plant multiple generations and bury them, so as to put enough CO2 back underground to correspond to the quantity we are releasing.
Yes, trees are now racist:
A Portland high school delayed a vote to change its mascot to an evergreen tree over concerns about its potential ties to lynching, a report said.
One board member, Martin Osborne, who is black, had the intelligence to point out that evergreen trees were not used for lynching, as anyone who has ever looked at their branches can appreciate.
Hey, it's nice to meet you! I'm a real person, organic bred and made of real meat and bones, and according to woke people, I'm racist.
I'm racist because I believe in equality of opportunity, rather than equality of outcome.
I'm racist because I believe IQ tests actually measure something, and IQ tests are not fundamentally flawed.
I'm racist because I'm aware these IQ tests show average IQs of Ashkenazi Jews around 115, Asians around 105, whites around 100, and black people unfortunately lower than that. Black Americans clock in around 85-95, and sub-Saharan Africans 75-85. Bushmen and Australian Aboriginals score even lower.
I'm racist because I understand that IQ is not an end-all, be-all measure that defines any particular individual. But the average IQ of a community is the single greatest predictor of the community's economic success.
I'm racist because I think people who happen to be of European Jewish descent make up 50% of our billionaires, and 90% of the people who run Hollywood and the media, not only because they favor each other and give themselves a leg up, but also because their high average IQ means there are so many more smart people who are Jewish than smart people of other races.
I'm racist because I think, although "race" is a vague social construct that is poorly defined at its borders, race is still a meaningful concept that has real effects and correlations.
Nice to meet you, I'm racist!
Technically, they did it with lots of vehicles, driving people recovering from respiratory conditions into nursing homes which were not permitted to refuse them.
They should move their HQ to Beijing.
Techno-feudalist is then perhaps the most accurate moniker I've come across, in that the globalists want to eliminate the middle class and make everyone their serfs. However, it doesn't have quite the same recognition.
What does a developer need to experience to fix a problem in their software? The outcomes associated with unwise choices and/or incorrect beliefs. However, to some extent this is misleading because there is no true cause and effect (only the appearance of it), all time is simultaneous, and everything happens at once in multiple timelines.
We are here to learn that we create our own reality. The "I" that creates it, however, is not simply the ego, but the entire personality. The ego needs to learn both to accept its responsibility (it's not a victim) and its limits (it cannot dominate; it needs to walk with the inner self).
They do not even respond to the problem reports on GitHub. There has been no fix for a year.
I know the app is still somewhat "new"
Serious problems, like the app being unusable because notifications don't work, need to be responded to promptly, and addressed within weeks.
To leave this unresponded and unaddressed for a year means there exists no developer who is seriously interested in people using this software on iOS.
Man is of good intent. When you see evil everywhere in man’s intent — in your own actions and those of others — then you set yourself up against your own existence, and that of your kind. You focus upon the gulf between your ideals and your experience, until the gulf is all that is real. You will not see man’s good intent, or you will do so ironically — for in comparison with your ideals, good in the world appears to be so minute as to be a mockery.
Each individual is innately driven by a good intent, however distorted that intent may become, or however twisted the means that may be taken to achieve it.
As the body wants to grow from childhood on, so all of the personality’s abilities want to grow and develop. Each person has his or her own ideals, and impulses direct those ideals naturally into their own specific avenues of development — avenues meant to fulfill both the individual and his society. Impulses provide specifications, methods, meanings, definitions. They point toward definite avenues of expression, avenues that will provide the individual with a sense of actualization, natural power, and that will automatically provide feedback, so that the person knows he is impressing his environment for the better.
Those natural impulses, followed, will automatically lead to political and social organizations that become both tools for individual development and implements for the fulfillment of the society. Impulses then would follow easily, in a smooth motion, from private action to social import. When you are taught to block your impulses, and to distrust them, then your organizations become clogged. You are left with vague idealized feelings of wanting to change the world for the better, for example — but you are denied the personal power of your own impulses that would otherwise help direct that idealism by developing your personal abilities. You are left with an undefined, persisting, even tormenting desire to do good, to change events, but without having any means at your disposal to do so. This leads to lingering frustration, and if your ideals are strong the situation can cause you to feel quite desperate.
You may begin to exaggerate the gulf between this generalized ideal and the specific evidences of man’s "greed and corruption" that you see so obviously about you. You may begin to concentrate upon your own lacks, and in your growing sense of dissatisfaction it may seem to you that most men are driven by a complete lack of good intent.
You may become outraged, scandalized — or worse, filled with self-righteousness, so that you begin to attack all those with whom you do not agree, because you do not know how else to respond to your own ideals, or to your own good intent.
The job of trying to make the world better seems impossible, for it appears that you have no power, and any small private beneficial actions that you can take seem so puny in contrast to this generalized ideal that you dismiss them sardonically, and so you do not try to use your power constructively. You do not begin with your own life, with your own job, or with your own associates. What difference can it make to the world if you are a better salesperson, or plumber, or office worker, or car salesman, for Christ’s sake? What can one person do?
Yet that is precisely where first of all you must begin to exert yourselves. There, on your jobs and in your associations, are the places where you intersect with the world. Your impulses directly affect the world in those relationships.
Many of you are convinced that you are not important — and while each of you feels that way it will seem that your actions have no effect upon the world. You will purposefully keep your ideals generalized, thus saving yourself from the necessity of acting upon them in the one way open to you: by trusting yourself and your impulses, and impressing those that you meet in daily life with the full validity that is your own.
Most criminals act out of a sense of despair. Many have high ideals, but ideals that have never been trusted or acted upon. They feel powerless, so that many strike out in self-righteous anger or vengeance against a world that they see as cynical, greedy, perverted. They have concentrated upon the great gaps that seem to exist between their ideals of what man should be, and their ideas of what man is.
On the one hand, they believe that the self is evil, and on the other they are convinced that the self should not be so. They react extravagantly. They often see society as the “enemy” of good. Many — not all, now — criminals possess the same characteristics you ascribe to heroes, except that the heroes have a means toward the expression of idealism, and specific avenues for that expression. And many criminals find such avenues cut off completely.
I do not want to romanticize criminals, or justify their actions. I do want to point out that few crimes are committed for “evil’s sake,” but in a distorted response to the failure of the actualization of a sensed ideal.
Here is what makes sense to me, and I think is true. You are free to decide what to do with this – I'm not here to coerce anyone, merely to offer an alternative view which I hope you might find convincing or even useful. Choice quotes from much longer material:
Man is of good intent. When you see evil everywhere in man’s intent — in your own actions and those of others — then you set yourself up against your own existence, and that of your kind. You focus upon the gulf between your ideals and your experience, until the gulf is all that is real. You will not see man’s good intent, or you will do so ironically — for in comparison with your ideals, good in the world appears to be so minute as to be a mockery.
Each individual is innately driven by a good intent, however distorted that intent may become, or however twisted the means that may be taken to achieve it.
As the body wants to grow from childhood on, so all of the personality’s abilities want to grow and develop. Each person has his or her own ideals, and impulses direct those ideals naturally into their own specific avenues of development — avenues meant to fulfill both the individual and his society. Impulses provide specifications, methods, meanings, definitions. They point toward definite avenues of expression, avenues that will provide the individual with a sense of actualization, natural power, and that will automatically provide feedback, so that the person knows he is impressing his environment for the better.
Those natural impulses, followed, will automatically lead to political and social organizations that become both tools for individual development and implements for the fulfillment of the society. Impulses then would follow easily, in a smooth motion, from private action to social import. When you are taught to block your impulses, and to distrust them, then your organizations become clogged. You are left with vague idealized feelings of wanting to change the world for the better, for example — but you are denied the personal power of your own impulses that would otherwise help direct that idealism by developing your personal abilities. You are left with an undefined, persisting, even tormenting desire to do good, to change events, but without having any means at your disposal to do so. This leads to lingering frustration, and if your ideals are strong the situation can cause you to feel quite desperate.
You may begin to exaggerate the gulf between this generalized ideal and the specific evidences of man’s "greed and corruption" that you see so obviously about you. You may begin to concentrate upon your own lacks, and in your growing sense of dissatisfaction it may seem to you that most men are driven by a complete lack of good intent.
You may become outraged, scandalized — or worse, filled with self-righteousness, so that you begin to attack all those with whom you do not agree, because you do not know how else to respond to your own ideals, or to your own good intent.
The job of trying to make the world better seems impossible, for it appears that you have no power, and any small private beneficial actions that you can take seem so puny in contrast to this generalized ideal that you dismiss them sardonically, and so you do not try to use your power constructively. You do not begin with your own life, with your own job, or with your own associates. What difference can it make to the world if you are a better salesperson, or plumber, or office worker, or car salesman, for Christ’s sake? What can one person do?
Yet that is precisely where first of all you must begin to exert yourselves. There, on your jobs and in your associations, are the places where you intersect with the world. Your impulses directly affect the world in those relationships.
Many of you are convinced that you are not important — and while each of you feels that way it will seem that your actions have no effect upon the world. You will purposefully keep your ideals generalized, thus saving yourself from the necessity of acting upon them in the one way open to you: by trusting yourself and your impulses, and impressing those that you meet in daily life with the full validity that is your own.
Most criminals act out of a sense of despair. Many have high ideals, but ideals that have never been trusted or acted upon. They feel powerless, so that many strike out in self-righteous anger or vengeance against a world that they see as cynical, greedy, perverted. They have concentrated upon the great gaps that seem to exist between their ideals of what man should be, and their ideas of what man is.
On the one hand, they believe that the self is evil, and on the other they are convinced that the self should not be so. They react extravagantly. They often see society as the “enemy” of good. Many — not all, now — criminals possess the same characteristics you ascribe to heroes, except that the heroes have a means toward the expression of idealism, and specific avenues for that expression. And many criminals find such avenues cut off completely.
I do not want to romanticize criminals, or justify their actions. I do want to point out that few crimes are committed for “evil’s sake,” but in a distorted response to the failure of the actualization of a sensed ideal.