2
CynicalSoapBox 2 points ago +2 / -0

He may have been. IDK. What I do know is he had a graze wound to his head and a round to his back.

2
CynicalSoapBox 2 points ago +2 / -0

The pedo doesn't have a hole in the head. His head was grazed. But he died because he was shot in his body. That shot supposedly bounced around and caused damage. However, even though in the videos of the event you can see the graze to his head, people are still claiming he died because he was shot in the head. The funny thing is, a 5.56 would not bounce around in him. However, a 9mm could and a 22LR certainly would. The entry wound for that round is on his back. There is a video of a muzzle flash coming from about 150 feet behind the pedo. I suspect that was the kill shot and that shot is the one who him the pedo in the back. I suspect Rittenhouse only grazed the pedo's head. I am waiting for the ballistics report.

I am reasonable sure it will show 2 shooters.

1
CynicalSoapBox 1 point ago +1 / -0

This was not a woman refusing to read the question she was supposed to read. This was a woman who was told to stand up and pretend she's stepping outside the planned narrative. Why? Because someone in Joe's campaign understands how to create a viral video. People who seem to be speaking from the heart are what creates viral videos.

Think about the veteran who essentially told a city council in California that a 1 million people will eventually take back America. It went viral because it was real. Think about that one angry rant by Tim Pool about 3 or 4 weeks ago about the corruption of the left and how it went viral. It was real and it resonated.

This video was trying to capitalize on that same process. But I don't think this was spontaneous. In fact I believe it was planned and honed. I bet she practiced her script for several days. I'm not one to buy into the whole "crisis actor" narrative very easy. Granted I have seen some things that make me question if actors are being used. But in this case I am 99% sure this woman is an actor or at least someone talented enough to tryout for a role as the girl who went off script.

4
CynicalSoapBox 4 points ago +4 / -0

People are being programed to stand by idly. If they intervene, what happens if the criminal gets hurt? What happens if the criminal is black and the good samaritan is white and the criminal gets hurt? We know what will happen. Even in this case where a sexual assault is taking place, they would still crucify a white guy who used force to stop this criminal. Hell, the left would riot and people like Joe Biden would demand the samaritan be charged,

3
CynicalSoapBox 3 points ago +3 / -0

You don't need to say anything to the cops. You need only not be a criminal POS and when stopped by the police, comply but remain silent and then let the courts work out the details if you are charged with a crime.

3
CynicalSoapBox 3 points ago +3 / -0

No, but he said it a day or so ago.

1
CynicalSoapBox 1 point ago +1 / -0

LOL I didn't even notice. I saw one of those airguns that could easily take down a deer.

2
CynicalSoapBox 2 points ago +2 / -0

That's a red pill that was hard to get down. He's still trying to regurgitate it.

2
CynicalSoapBox 2 points ago +2 / -0

The "staff" are calling on reporters willing to only ask the questions they were handed by the campaign before it began.

0
CynicalSoapBox 0 points ago +2 / -2

I don't think an older woman having a sexual relationship with a 17 year old boy, warrants an execution. When I was 17(actually 16) I had sex with this woman down the road. Her husband was never home. She was in her 30s and I enjoyed it. I wasn't a victim.

11
CynicalSoapBox 11 points ago +11 / -0

The left don't care if you are a woman, a mother or if their actions will destroy you. They don't care because they are sociopaths who are incapable of genuine empathy. They can pretend to have empathy. But that's just a tactic to seem normal.

1
CynicalSoapBox 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's my understanding that each state determines their own rules in regards to how votes are cast. It's my understanding that a state could say that only mail in votes are permitted or only in person voting with ID is permitted. Then if people wish to challenge that process, someone from that state must sue in a state court and eventually it could be challenged in SCOTUS.

That said, I think it should be a priority in February next year to pass federal laws that do govern the voting process and make them uniform throughout the states. However, I think that would require a constitutional amendment. That is unless Article 1 Section 8 Clause 1 of the constitution can somehow be used. But even-though I have heard a few people float that Idea, I don't think that section will work because it's specifically about taxes. Although I think it could possibly be argued that doing so could be an act of "common defense and general welfare".

3
CynicalSoapBox 3 points ago +3 / -0

The use of a molotov cocktail is deadly force and thus, deadly force in defense is justified.

4
CynicalSoapBox 4 points ago +4 / -0

I would like to think a candidate swap after the primary VOTE would be totally destructive to the party. But I don't really think there are enough functioning brain cells to care. I think the drones will look for the proverbial blue column and check all.

As to if that will help or harm the DNC in their attempt to win the election, I don't think it will make any difference. That is unless there are enough people who would normally sit this election out but suddenly choose to vote a couple of vajajays into the white house because of sexist reasons.

27
CynicalSoapBox 27 points ago +27 / -0

Twitter said they "made a mistake". It's funny how everytime twitter makes a mistake, a voice not touting their approved narrative gets silenced. Almost always they are on the right. That's not a mistake, that's enemy action.

34
CynicalSoapBox 34 points ago +34 / -0

That's them planting an idea into people's heads that way when they do cheat, many will just roll their eyes and tuck their tails in submission.

Wait and see, more people will vote than there are people who are registered to vote.

4
CynicalSoapBox 4 points ago +5 / -1

The only good commie is a commie who just took a helicopter ride.

1
CynicalSoapBox 1 point ago +1 / -0

The movie is not what Netflix marketing portrayed it as. The movie is not a pedo circle jerk fantasy film. The movie is about how hollywood and businesses like Netflix sexualize children for profit. Netflix marketing did exactly what the movie condems when they created sexualized posters and graphics to advertise the movie.

view more: Next ›