by doubles
6
DX5_ 6 points ago +6 / -0

hate group researcher on Reddit.

Don't try and church it up, woman. Don't you mean you're an unemployed leftist that spends all day being a bigot toward anyone who doesn't think exactly like you?

6
DX5_ 6 points ago +6 / -0

How can you loan 140%

The same share can be sold more than once if the buyer then lends their share out for shorting.

38
DX5_ 38 points ago +38 / -0

I'm a programmer and I agree 100%. Even Windows 10 is a huge liability with how much info they try to obtain, all the bloatware and all their cloud based bullshit. They really try to move your entire life to their servers. You have to do a lot of work to get that OS to an acceptable level of privacy.

2
DX5_ 2 points ago +2 / -0

In a fair court of law it seems like the incitement case would still be weak even without evidence of planning. If Trump is held accountable then it sets a bad precedent for anyone organizing a peaceful event or protest: If that event or protest somehow gets out of hand then the court would be saying the organizer could held responsible- even if they denounced the violence and left the area when things started to get bad. This would basically take away your right to organize a protest, or at least make it a huge liability not worth taking.

17
DX5_ 17 points ago +17 / -0

this plot twist is so confusing

Except there is no plot twist. Getting duped isn't a twist lol.

3
DX5_ 3 points ago +3 / -0

msm still has comment sections?

1
DX5_ 1 point ago +1 / -0

They get upset with Trump not wearing a mask, but Biden is up there literally licking his fingers and it's ok.

2
DX5_ 2 points ago +2 / -0

I love RSBN but damn are they amateurs who are slow learners. We could have the most important event in the world, and it's almost guaranteed they will forget to turn sound on until about two minutes in.

6
DX5_ 6 points ago +9 / -3

Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. We shouldn't need to make a rebuttal because we aren't the ones making the extraordinary claim.

1
DX5_ 1 point ago +1 / -0

This site appears to be risky.

What does that even mean?

Because it is new or may not have the latest security.

So which is it? They're doing a pretty lousy job at specifying what the problem is. Are sites flagged as risky for the crime of being new? That's pretty stupid. And they know it too, which is why they tacked on the "may not have latest security" bullshit. What a fucking joke.

9
DX5_ 9 points ago +9 / -0

They'll probably do what Spez did and make downvotes worth only a 10th of a vote on certain channels. Or the WH youtube page will just start disabling ratings.

18
DX5_ 18 points ago +19 / -1

This is not necessarily a bad thing, but why should we be supporting Sidney Powell? What exactly has Powell done for us besides take donations? I'm all for restoring the republic, but one of our movement's biggest problems is putting trust into people who talk big and fail to deliver.

13
DX5_ 13 points ago +13 / -0

I think creating a MAGA or Patriot party is a great idea. Supposing we do that, what will we do differently to stop the people we elect from backstabbing us? With the help of Trump we got a lot of people elected who pretended to be pro-Trump, then turned against us.

2
DX5_ 2 points ago +2 / -0

I love how these idiots see the writing on the wall, then suddenly they're "no longer interested" in running. Kinda like that person who claims to be practicing celibacy, but you know it's not them making the decision.

5
DX5_ 5 points ago +5 / -0

That's peak leftism right there- Always pushing some bullshit on to others, never thinking it will one day be applied to them. Whether it's Learning to Code, censorship, cancel culture, overhyping a pandemic, etc. It always comes back to bite them.

67
DX5_ 67 points ago +67 / -0

This is clearly a result of Biden's dangerous and divisive rhetoric. Welcome to Biden's America.

1
DX5_ 1 point ago +1 / -0

The leftist who made this forgot a few:
-"Put children in cages"
-"Ban all Muslims"
-"Bring back torture"
-"Collude with Russia"

1
DX5_ 1 point ago +1 / -0

I think it extends beyond politics and is more about the person and whether or not they approach life from an objective or subjective standpoint. But politics is a really streamlined way of revealing this difference. A subjective person is going to be governed by their feelings and opinions. I think these people do have values and positions, but they're mostly based on emotion. Because of that, they end up having lots of beliefs which conflict with one another, which makes it impossible to have consistent principals. Leftism works really hard to exploit these kinds of people.

3
DX5_ 3 points ago +3 / -0

This is interesting. I wonder if groups like Shariablue are still being funded now that their candidate is installed? These people were herded like sheep for the last five years, and they're not going to be very effective when their narrative and thinking isn't being done for them.

15
DX5_ 15 points ago +15 / -0

But but but Trump is using this crisis as an opportunity to promote his business!
-Reddit probably

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›