That’s very good point. We should be pissed at the RINO state legislatures and (many)!executives for cucking out, first for allowing soros and the gang to push all the absentee and mail in rule changes through in the year before elections, then for refusing to certify alternate electors.
Finally at the courts, but by then it was a sealed deal...Trump railed against it the entire time.
Definitely not constitutional but gotta have standing right? Why would any Republican state legislature agree to this?
Article is from January 7
Just delisting the ccp companies from nasdaq or Dow Jones etc.
Eo was done and announced in November just is enforceable starting tomorrow
Shit yeah trump knows how to roll like that- What’d he say about Cruz married to a donkey looking woman or something equally offensive?
It’s not just the art of the deal, it’s the art of telling someone they are a wonderful person and making small talk as you squeeze their balls harder with your other hand.
It’s bossier parish , not county. We like to keep It complicated here
Yeah. It’s been snowing here. All of the tree branches fall And pull down power lines every time it snows.
Cmon man!!They had some awesome discounts on some made in chyna garbage!
If IA is to go down, I think trump would need to step back a little bit and lay low while the initial arrests take place and shock sets in for normies. It makes sense to me that he is staying out of site because he is still fighting. He knows how to concede and kiss ass and play nice if he were going that route.
It needs to be clear that locking traitors up is not something done just because DJT doesn’t like them, it’s done because they have committed crimes against our nation and are treasonous criminals
Monkey worx is legit. He is one of 3 I’ve seen saying the IA has been “activated,” or rather, that military movements have been triggered by orders given under authority of the act.
Other clues that support that conclusion- 1)random posts by other pedes with military family members that have just been given orders to report
- the desperate actions of pelosi and other deep state, mam, and big tech. These are not the actions of people who have just secured an election victory with more votes than any candidate in history. THEY HAVE BLOCKED HIS SOCIAL MEDIA COMMUNICATIONS, SCRUBBED INTERNET OF HIS SUPPORTERS POSTS, PUBLICLY HUMILIATED HIM.....really need the 25th or impeachment for last 8 days?
Man, the ACLU is even taking trumps side!
- man the hunter laptop, burisma shit, DNI REPORT!!!, election fraud, hypocrisy re BLM vs patriots, election fraud, Ukraine, Italy....all that shit looks really bad. As brainwashed as the normies may be, cartoon corruption and fraud has got to be noticed at some point? At least I home!
They are currently in the rooms? Today, Sunday January 10, 2020
Over here in eastern and central time our four young children are all sleeping peacefully....we prayed before they went to bed and prayed for this country and our president.
Just terribly wrong! Those savages standing inside the capitol building! And taking selfies!!!! One of them even wrote on Nancy pelosi’s folder and someone else put their feet on her desk!
Oh the horror!
Only thing I see there dated newer than 2009 is a 2009-2013 document from Venezuela
Looks like all old stuff unless I’m missing something?
Just a thought...if you had a search warrant for Pelosi laptop based on intelligence and you didn’t want to tip her off, wouldn’t weds have been an awesome time to snatch it ?
Of course he hasn’t given up......seriously??? He gave an hour long speech about how he would fight the steal and not stop fighting. What changed between then and now?
Unarmed protestors ‘forced’ their way into the capital and took pictures at pelosi desk?
Bowser’s cops murdered someone in cold blood?
What the fuck??!!?? Last night was Tame. That’s not gonna stop trump
Yeah..... repeatedly. Had to do on desktop too.
Yes all of that is correct. My question is why would pence follow the act and not the constitution?
Slipperysnek33 is correct. Here’s what that constitution thing has to say about it all:
“The electors shall meet in their respective states and vote by ballot for President and Vice-President, one of whom, at least, shall not be an inhabitant of the same state with themselves; they shall name in their ballots the person voted for as President, and in distinct ballots the person voted for as Vice-President, and they shall make distinct lists of all persons voted for as President, and of all persons voted for as Vice-President, and of the number of votes for each, which lists they shall sign and certify, and transmit sealed to the seat of the government of the United States, directed to the President of the Senate. The President of the Senate shall, in the presence of the Senate and House of Representatives, open all the certificates and the votes shall then be counted. The person having the greatest number of votes for President, shall be the President, if such number be a majority of the whole number of electors appointed; and if no person have such majority, then from the persons having the highest numbers not exceeding three on the list of those voted for as President, the House of Representatives shall choose immediately, by ballot, the President. But in choosing the President, the votes shall be taken by states, the representation from each state having one vote; a quorum for this purpose shall consist of a member or members from two-thirds of the states, and a majority of all the states shall be necessary to a choice. And if the House of Representatives shall not choose a President whenever the right of choice shall devolve upon them, before the fourth day of March next following, then the Vice-President shall act as President, as in the case of the death or other constitutional disability of the President.”
Where is that procedure located in the constitution?
The 12th amendment gives exactly zero power of the members of the senate to object to anything. The written objection from rep and senators AND the two hour debate language is found in the electoral count act. The 12th amendment gives the dispute resolution power to house of reps by state delegation where the president of senate cannot count a majority for any party.
Those are two conflicting procedures. Why would the simple majority-passed piece of legislation (electoral count act ) dictate the procedure rather than the constitution?
Where is the procedure for written house and senate objection located in the constitution?
“The electors shall meet in their respective states and vote by ballot for President and Vice-President, one of whom, at least, shall not be an inhabitant of the same state with themselves; they shall name in their ballots the person voted for as President, and in distinct ballots the person voted for as Vice-President, and they shall make distinct lists of all persons voted for as President, and of all persons voted for as Vice-President, and of the number of votes for each, which lists they shall sign and certify, and transmit sealed to the seat of the government of the United States, directed to the President of the Senate. The President of the Senate shall, in the presence of the Senate and House of Representatives, open all the certificates and the votes shall then be counted. The person having the greatest number of votes for President, shall be the President, if such number be a majority of the whole number of electors appointed; and if no person have such majority, then from the persons having the highest numbers not exceeding three on the list of those voted for as President, the House of Representatives shall choose immediately, by ballot, the President. But in choosing the President, the votes shall be taken by states, the representation from each state having one vote; a quorum for this purpose shall consist of a member or members from two-thirds of the states, and a majority of all the states shall be necessary to a choice. And if the House of Representatives shall not choose a President whenever the right of choice shall devolve upon them, before the fourth day of March next following, then the Vice-President shall act as President, as in the case of the death or other constitutional disability of the President.”
Doesn’t the 2 hour debate (post written senate and house objection) originate in the electoral count act? Has it ever been challenged prior to Gohmert?
How is it a constitutional gray area? Do you mean that in the sense that the electoral count act has not been challenged since passed?
It appears from I have read of the text and comments to the 12th amendment that
-
full and exclusive authority/ discretion is vested in the VP.
-
that it goes to the house by delegation if the VP cannot choose.
Again, I may be overlooking something, but I don’t see how the electoral count act could change the constitutionally established procedure. It was a conventional piece of legislation passed by simple majority of legislature; a constitutional amendment would be necessary to alter the 12th amendment.
How do you figure that pence does not have the constitutional power count the electors in the manner that he sees fit? Despite the conflict in the electoral counts act And the 12th amendment, BOTH acknowledge pence’s power to count electoral votes.
The 12th amendment has explicit instructions indicating the manner in which votes should be counted and the manner in which competing or disputed electors should be addressed.
Unless I am missing something, I don’t see why pence could not disregard the conflicting (and prima facia unconstitutional) provisions in the electoral count act and follow the 12th amendment. This would eliminate the need for senators to object and send it straight to the house ( by state delegation, not individual state representative ) if pence felt the need to punt.
I stand with you. Silence is violence.