1
DanWang 1 point ago +1 / -0

Doesn't mean she's the only one posting, but that she may control the account credentials or was solely responsible for the posting instructions. Remember, she and Epstein worked FOR someone. When she got publicly popped, they may have pulled the plug.

4
DanWang 4 points ago +4 / -0

Was it a 9mm? I keep seeing reports that it was a Tok, which would be big if true.

45
DanWang 45 points ago +45 / -0

The boting is nuts. It's even more flagrant in the voting than it used to be.

6
DanWang 6 points ago +6 / -0

The way AR prices have been for the last few years, there's been no excuse for not having a couple extras on hand in case you needed to follow the first rule.

25
DanWang 25 points ago +25 / -0

The outlets fighting the the order, yes. Anyone else could do it before receiving and order though.

11
DanWang 11 points ago +12 / -1

Most of the threepers i've encountered could do with some treadmill time now that the 'rona has cut off the buffet line.

2
DanWang 2 points ago +2 / -0

Distro contracts frequently supply a lot of the funding, or the equity used to secure funding to actually make the movie. The dude who produced Dredd actually talked about this at length a few years ago.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kWP88WKVBKs

1
DanWang 1 point ago +1 / -0

In otherwords, he's giving the seat away to whatever Dem was running for it.

3
DanWang 3 points ago +5 / -2

You're downvoted, but not wrong. Another issue is specialized labor behind the camera. Anyone that works in pedowood, meaning everyone who already possesses the skills, will be blacklisted if they take work at this studio. Same probably goes for actors/directors, so you will be reliant on personnel/talent that is willing to completely torch their established income, in order to work for you.

That's a tough hiring parameter.

2
DanWang 2 points ago +2 / -0

Real answer is probably Vitamin D levels and not being in confined spaces with other people because, you know, homeless.

Also, probably underreporting.

212
DanWang 212 points ago +221 / -9

Nice words, I'm more interested in what they are planning to DO before November though.

0
DanWang 0 points ago +1 / -1

The head of the campaign is absolutely in charge of developing a strategy to mitigate fraud, yes. WTF are you talking about?

11
DanWang 11 points ago +16 / -5

I've been warning that Parscale had bought his own hype and didn't have a winning plan for months. He firmly believes that he won the election with some Facebook ads and that his good friends at FB would never lie to him.

He is either ignorant to the contributions of The_Donald, 4chan and all of the long since banned Twitter warriors, or he's massively downplaying their impact, an impact that can't be replicated in the current censored environment.

Either way, Parscale was fucking up.

1
DanWang 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's not like he has platforms welcoming the Trump campaign.

THAT's HIS FUCKING JOB TO FIX.

He had 3 years and didn't spend a dime on an alternative channel to Twitter for POTUS's messaging, but was happy to dump hundreds of millions on Facebook.

Brad is many things, a genius isn't one of them.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›