4
Dangrenade 4 points ago +5 / -1

If you weren’t so busy licking your own goddamn ass, you would notice that I posted a SCREEN CAPTURE, not a fucking LINK.

So I suggest you pull your head out of your own damn ass so that maybe you can see who’s on your side, and who isn’t.

And if you can’t do that, dickhead, then I suggest you join the democrats, where you can enjoy eating each other.

1
Dangrenade 1 point ago +1 / -0

It’s a joke today, it’s government policy tomorrow

1
Dangrenade 1 point ago +1 / -0

And now you understand how government works.

by womp
1
Dangrenade 1 point ago +1 / -0

I think they suspended her rather than deleting individual tweets.

The real problem was she was speaking the truth About her family’s actual beliefs.

1
Dangrenade 1 point ago +1 / -0

It’s absolutely a true statement, and could be spoken in support of liberty, or depriving people of their liberty. Judging by the rest of her opinions, she intended the latter

1
Dangrenade 1 point ago +1 / -0

I perused the account yesterday. It looked completely legitimate to me. I think Twitter wanted to memory haul some of her crazy opinions, but the leading a few tweets would be obvious. Better to delete them all and Label it a fake account.

1
Dangrenade 1 point ago +1 / -0

But it wasn’t fake. I think Twitter is trying to memory haul some of her opinions, and instead of making it obvious and deleting one or two tweets, they just banned them all and said they were fake

1
Dangrenade 1 point ago +1 / -0

She’s arguing for depriving people of their liberty, yes. I didn’t believe it at first, but when I looked through all of her tweets, it was obvious.

0
Dangrenade 0 points ago +1 / -1

It’s suspended now, but it did not look fake to me when I perused it.

1
Dangrenade 1 point ago +1 / -0

I looked at a lot of her other opinions, and yes she was advocating for denying people of their liberty

1
Dangrenade 1 point ago +1 / -0

It’s absolutely a true statement, but it could be spoken in support of liberty or depriving people of their liberty. She intended the latter

1
Dangrenade 1 point ago +1 / -0

When you start with a faulty philosophy and worldview, you need drugs to drown out the chaos in your mind.

1
Dangrenade 1 point ago +1 / -0

There’s the obvious, atlas shrugged.

You mentioned Vonnegut. Also read breakfast of champions by him.

I love Heinlein. “The moon is a harsh mistress” is a great libertarian book, as is “time enough for love”, And “stranger in a strange land”

2
Dangrenade 2 points ago +2 / -0

I sure hope someone photoshops Pepe’s head on this.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›