He said they have evidence... I wish they'd provide some already!
Tim never went full Trump. But his last line is wrong. This year has been decidedly less boring than previous years.
There was a time when I believed that Trump couldn't be re-elected. I was so mad at the impeachment hoax and how they just forced an obvious lie to try to negate our votes. I believed that the only was Trump was able to win was because Hillary Clinton was his opponent. You'll never get another candidate that terrible...
Democrats: Hold my beer!
We'll have to see what the surprise is in August at the convention. I'm sure they won't go forward with Joe Bi-dmentia. And then the COVID-19 second wave is scheduled for October....
Well, the slander and the allegories to Hitler are on purpose. The press wants to make that connection as much as they can and try to paint him as a totalitarian, fascist dictator. He keeps proving the opposite, yet they continue to use the smears. No other president would have been handed a crisis like COVID-19 and fail to increase his power. Trump showed amazing restraint and honor, there. His heart is in the right place and no matter what he does they will hate him.
I looked up what I could, on the quotes, and I don't see how it materially vindicates Germany, per se. His advocating for use of chemical weapons against savages is deplorable, but can be seen in a different light, contextually. He was, after all, the leader of the largest empire in the world, at the time. Wars with indigenous peoples had been a mainstay for hundreds of years. His predecessors carried out similar atrocities without the need for gas. A lot of global societal change has occurred in those intervening years.
But Germany was the aggressor into Poland, right? It was annexation of previous German lands, similar to Putin's annexation of Crimea, if I'm getting my historical context correct. And Hitler also invaded Austria, right? Though there wasn't much fighting.
Predicate and circumstance have more to do with righteousness of cause than specific tactical actions in war, or even the application of total war in response to aggression, wouldn't you agree?
Sorry, I didn't see this until now. My point was that he banged that chick. That's all, really, lol.
He's not a CNN shill, of course, by any means.
Wait, what?
I'd like to know more about this. This sounds like holocaust denial, and as such would get censored by the overlords in most media. But I'd like to hear you out. I never heard of the brownshirts until the post you replied to, I'm going to look them up right now.
I consider myself informed, especially about WW2, but when I went to college and learned that dropping the 2nd bomb on Nagasaki DIDN'T force the Japanese to surrender... kinda made me question everything.
Tucker Carlson has a soft spot for her, too. He used to work at CNN, I'm told.
If he's rich, he obviously stole the money from someone! /s
He's saying "any loss for PP is a good thing"
Agreed. I want more rebuttal to the Democrats' charge that all of these people are corrupt. It's hard to know who to believe. For now, I'll trust Rudy.
But if we have it, then whoever we took it from knows we have it. . . right? Who exactly are we trapping?