6
DemandVoterID 6 points ago +6 / -0

Have those laws actually been challenged yet? Hard to believe that will stand up, especially if it can be successfully demonstrated that fraud in various states throws the "popular vote" totals into question

2
DemandVoterID 2 points ago +2 / -0

Likely a reason to choose Harris as running mate; if she's compromised by the same Hunter stuff, it makes it less likely she'd use it to just Biden and usurp the presidency. Fortunately, that won't happen now

2
DemandVoterID 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'm not 100% on the applicable laws but I thought that the the USPS restriction was only on ballots sent to voters and their return to the counting facilities. I could absolutely be wrong.

1
DemandVoterID 1 point ago +1 / -0

To be fair, these could be unfilled ballots for the upcoming runoff election

2
DemandVoterID 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yeah, except then they'd just commit small amounts of fraud benefiting Republicans in already deep-red states to get them disqualified

1
DemandVoterID 1 point ago +1 / -0

I certainly agree that timing and magnitude of impact are important, I just think there'd be more juice to squeeze if the analysis was open-sourced, especially if it was all released two weeks ago

2
DemandVoterID 2 points ago +2 / -0

I disagree; there's still so much left untold. Rolling out a new fact pattern requires drawing connections and showing how everything connects, explicitly. They should have dumped it all for the autists to find the nuggets, well-known accounts to distribute a unified work product, and the Rush/Tucker's of the world to simplify and mass-spread

3
DemandVoterID 3 points ago +3 / -0

It would make more sense to have a centralized body delegating certain activities to a network of local and regional bodies, like a Federal something or other

1
DemandVoterID 1 point ago +1 / -0

Seems like it would just be easier to have a more capable candidate run and then buy off the right people with his illicit gains

view more: ‹ Prev