9
Demandred 9 points ago +9 / -0

"Thank god the swamp's back in charge!" - Democrats

Seriously, watching them jump for joy over a candidate they HATED during their primaries is a perfect encapsulation of Democrat partisan stupidity. Blue good, no matter what.

1
Demandred 1 point ago +1 / -0

I have no plans to attack anyone. Going on the offensive isn't my thing, but I can defend myself if it comes down to it.

That said, if an Independence Day-style laser beam comes down from the sky and vaporizes Congress while it's in session, I'd probably cackle like that old lady in Mars Attacks. "AHAHAHAHA! They blew up congress! Hehehehehehehehe!"

2
Demandred 2 points ago +2 / -0

BLM beating people in the streets = the understandable cries of the "oppressed". Protesting a stolen election = unconscionable scary "violence"

These people are vile.

5
Demandred 5 points ago +5 / -0

If I have to see one more breathless declaration that this was an "attack on the foundations of our democracy" I'm going to puke. These exact people were fawning over that pig hat march and the Kavanaugh banshees pounding on the doors of the Capitol building. You go guuuuuurls. Protesting blatant election fraud? Clutch those pearls. Fling yourself at a fainting couch. Darkest days, abloobloobloo.

Leftists know they just have to screw their faces up into an approximation of "sad" or "scared" and their entire political wing falls for it every time.

3
Demandred 3 points ago +3 / -0

Leftists are mortified the cops aren't mowing the protestors down. Oh I see. Burn Loot Murder setting a city on fire doesn't warrant force. Only right wing protests. Got it. I hope these people move to China.

1
Demandred 1 point ago +1 / -0

All this pearl-clutching about "preserving peaceful democracy" from the people who just told us that we voted wrong and cheated their preferred candidate in is enough to make you sick.

1
Demandred 1 point ago +1 / -0

And the lefties I know are already proclaiming that, if this were a BLM "protest", the police would have butchered them all with no regrets.

They don't live in reality.

39
Demandred 39 points ago +39 / -0

This is a typical interim step before they claim that $2000 was a Democrat idea all along. And now it's the eeeevul RePIGlicans trying to keep money away from you.

Just wait. This is going to be "Pelosi's bill" in a day or so once they have enough noise to make people forget Trump blocked Congress's bullshit in the first place. They'll claim Pelosi and Schumer wanted 2k all along.

1
Demandred 1 point ago +1 / -0

Pronouns are a convenience for someone speaking. They aren't ego boosters for a listener. They're also linguistically considered a "closed class", i.e. a part of speech that is highly jarring and nearly impossible to add new words to since the category is effectively finished. Anyone who advertises "their" pronouns is announcing they're a nutcase. Don't hire nutcases.

4
Demandred 4 points ago +4 / -0

Witnesses? Next you'll be telling me they have testimony, video evidence, hard forensic data on voting machine "glitches", compounding statistical anomalies, suspiciously fresh ballots from "people" living at post offices, and the hilariously unbelievable assertion that Creepy Joe Biden, the man with tens of people at his rallies, is the most popular president in history.

The court will yawn and dismiss before looking at any of it.

4
Demandred 4 points ago +4 / -0

I thought we already established that SCOTUS does whatever the hell it wants, "dare" doesn't even enter the picture. They're already cozy with the idea of The Swamp retaking the throne.

2
Demandred 2 points ago +2 / -0

They need that 25m for cleaning supplies. They've got to have enough disinfectant on standby every time Nadler sharts himself.

1
Demandred 1 point ago +1 / -0

Dirty gay here. I want to have a closed relationship with a guy who's worth it someday. I think STDs are disgusting. I don't want anything to do with the school system. I don't want to make physical contact with your kids. I don't want to wave my dick at you in a parade. I don't care if your bizarre orthodox religious beliefs forbid you from making me pastries. I think tranny nutjobs like the one pictured in the OP need to be kept far away from public policy of all types.

Gays are 99% brainwashed leftists. It's the leftism that causes all the batshit behavior you hate.

2
Demandred 2 points ago +2 / -0

I've already received the smug HR email from my corporate overlords expressing relief that next year will be "Brighter. Without as much political turmoil".

Turmoil YOU CAUSED, you leftist pieces of...

5
Demandred 5 points ago +5 / -0

Wishing you the best with that. I live in a leftist hive; the guys around here are nearly all Peter Pans and soy golems. I wouldn't date or sleep with one of those if you paid me.

MAGA baby! Their wailing and screeching makes it easier to spot them from a distance and avoid.

6
Demandred 6 points ago +6 / -0

Agreed. Gay, wasn't abused or converted into it. I've found the LGBT "community" revolting for the most part. Pride parades are tasteless at their best, disgusting at worst. I don't want to convert your kids. I have no inclination to sleep around or spread diseases. That's a leftist trait, not a gay one. It just so happens that a large visible majority of gays have their brains poisoned by leftism.

13
Demandred 13 points ago +14 / -1

Give up? Nah. Horrified that the Supreme Court majority believes that states don't cause legal injury to one another when they flagrantly violate their own election rules? You bet I am.

This just shows us how foul the swamp really is. Keep at it, GEOTUS.

1
Demandred 1 point ago +1 / -0

Wait. The PA legislature joined in on this, right? Help me out here. So if there's no standing to sue these states for violating their own constitutions, how the fuck is the Supreme Court supposed to punish any state for doing something like this? I'd think this is way more dangerous precedent than listening to it.

4
Demandred 4 points ago +4 / -0

They're not supposed to be. Modern times have created the difference between someone who follows constitutional and court precedent...and an activist hack who legislates from the bench. The latter type just "coincidentally" end up getting appointed by Democrats.

3
Demandred 3 points ago +3 / -0

Technically speaking, the only hard date that matters is the day a president is sworn in. There's precedent for shifts happening up to that point, but they get rarer and rarer the closer it gets. SCOTUS has cases where they have made both single and multi-state rulings on election shenanigans, so it's not like this has never happened before.

1
Demandred 1 point ago +1 / -0

The sun rose in the morning. Clearly that means capitalism has failed and we need to embrace Communism. They'll use every single event in human history as an excuse.

1
Demandred 1 point ago +1 / -0

Dunno about you, but I'm willing to believe large simultaneous quantities of sewage appeared near separate gatherings of Democrats. It's just nature's course.

1
Demandred 1 point ago +1 / -0

I love how the Twitterati are handwaving her away calling her "drunk". Coming from people who fall all over themselves praising Queen Pelosi, patron demon of liquor, that's pretty rich.

11
Demandred 11 points ago +11 / -0

I swear to God it's like you people think the concept of death was invented last year. That's not really different from the normal amount of people who die of diseases every year, it's only a spooktacular huge number when the media claims it is.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›