We're fine with the destruction of a Democracy, because we want a Constitutional Republic. A Democracy is mob rule of two wolves, one sheep...
Edit: and that color scheme, lol? That orange is waaaaay to obvious. How about, oh, I don't know...RED, WHITE, and BLUE.
That is an interesting perspective I hadn't considered but it makes sense, and would also explain why there was overall growth (although small) in the stocks during Obama's term. This doesn't, however, make me feel any better about continuing to invest in the stock market. At some point doesn't the façade have to end? This can't continue indefinitely, so at what point do the repercussions take effect?
I think you may be right...I have a gut feeling there is a false sense of confidence in where the country is headed, and I certainly don't want to wait around for what's coming.
Question, if Trump doesn't initiate the Insurrection Act today, then does that make the state legislatures our last peaceful option?
Huh...glad I'm not the only one who knows what the Nephilim are. Greetings, fren
Was curious and double-checked - sure enough.
And David put his hand into his bag and took from it a stone and slung it, and struck the Philistine on his forehead. And the stone sank into his forehead, so that he fell on his face to the ground.
Thus David prevailed over the Philistine with a sling and a stone, and he struck the Philistine and killed him; but there was no sword in David’s hand.
Then David ran and stood over the Philistine and took his sword and drew it out of its sheath and killed him, and cut off his head with it. When the Philistines saw that their champion was dead, they fled.
We all understand what the end goal is of the Insurrection Act, but how exactly does this play out constitutionally speaking?
This should be the top comment. I don’t think most Americans have any idea how dangerous and influential the media has become - or even care for that matter. They completely control what problems are addressed and which ones are ignored in the eyes of the public. So many of the problems our country is facing could have been avoided and even solved if our media was fair and honest. There must be severe punishment and accountability for there to be true change.
I don't know the intricacies of this process, but let's say SCOTUS takes the case in-between Jan 6th to 14th and rules in our favor in Michigan (and that's a BIG ASS 'if'). What happens then? Can the electoral votes be decertified in Michigan, or it is too late? Would this ruling only apply to Michigan, or potentially affect other contested states as well that are pending SCOTUS review?
I want to believe this as well, but how is there a path to victory through SCOTUS when they tossed out the Texas lawsuit?
"Bogus"? I would have thought these dipshits knew that they're presenting their opening statement to the highest court in the Union, not a grade school debate class.
You can turn that cuck alert off
Settings --> Exposure Notifications
A non-violent solution for the gracious lady pede...;) I'm sure other State Health Departments have similar paperwork if you're not from California.
Texans don't carry BB guns...just sayin', lol
You need to install an adblocker when visiting those cuck websites. Don't support them in any way.
Had to read that title in an Australian accent. Glorious.
Wasn't the vote 5-4? I'm glad SCOTUS sided in favor of churches, but the restrictions were in TOTAL violation of the free exercise of religion. I can't believe it was 5-4. Should have been 9-0.
The official BRCC statement reads, "We do not support legal advocacy efforts. We do not sponsor nor do we have a relationship with the 17-year-old facing charges in Kenosha, WI."
It's clear according to BRCC that they didn't sponsor Kyle directly to wear the shirt, and nothing was said officially about canceling a sponsorship for the Blaze podcast in that statement. Is it true that BRCC canceled their sponsorship of the Blaze podcast?
"Schaffer’s podcast, "Slightly Offens*ve," was sponsored by Black Rifle, but a spokesperson for the coffee company told the Tribune that it is terminating that relationship."
Getting mixed signals...
Scurrying out of the light like a bunch of cockroaches
Let’s face it, most of these people aren’t mourning and angry for Ruth, they’re mourning and angry because Trump will replace her. That’s pretty low, but I can’t say I’m surprised
Wow, a Kukri, first one I’ve seen on here. Way cool!
I work with Photoshop as a professional and couldn’t find a single error in the edit. Is it doable, yes, but making it authentic...completely different story. Matching reflective lighting on the text as it is on the paper, increased bluriness of the text at further distances. The guy who put this together is a master. The leading (line spacing) looks a little too narrow to be official, but it’s a great edit. Bravo
🇺🇸🦅Mericaaaaaw!!! 🦅🇺🇸
I agree, but we were also the majority when the China Virus reared its head last year. I feel like the state of mind for most Conservatives was, "we just need do as we're told, go with the flow, and things will return to normal faster that way." But now a new normal is coming and it won't be the one that we want. All three branches of our government have been overtaken with no way to lose that power, and 'Democrats' can now give the Constitution whatever meaning they want it to have, unopposed. POTUS wants peace, I get that and support him, but what will he say if and when there is a mandatory buy-back for our guns? Should we be peaceful then? I want peace, however, the longer this continues, the lower the chance this all ends up being resolved peacefully. I believe it's just a matter of how much time passes until then. it's time to pray for the best, and prepare for the worst.